Saturday, September 24, 2016


Sting with If you love somebody set them free. Album The Dream of the Blue Turtles (1985).

If you didn't know he was from Northumberland (Wallsend to be precise) you know now.

Bread with If. From the 1971 album Manna.

Soft rock band from LA.

Gute Nacht meine Damen und Herren.



One item among many. Sweden is lost. An appalling article in the FriaTider, a Swedish daily, 24 September 2016:

* Friends of the Somali rapist began harassing and beating 13-year-old Ida after he was convicted
* Despite documented injuries, prosecutor Jens Göransson consistently drops all charges
* Social services threaten to put Ida in a foster home because she lives in a Muslim "risk environment"
* Now, the family is forced to flee to Norway in order to keep the girl to themselves.

 photo ida_sundsvall_zpscrcgoajn.jpg

 photo ida_rape_Sweden_2016_zpst9ycfsbz.jpg

Published 20 september 2016

"INRIKES. When Ida had just turned twelve, she was brutally raped by a Somali man. Since then, she has been forced to endure being beaten, threatened and sexually harassed by the rapist's Muslim friends. Since the charges have been consistently dropped by procecutors, the family now sees no other alternative but to flee to Norway. “We have Jewish roots and get attacked by Muslims. The authorities are doing everything to protect the Somalis,” Ida's father told the Free Times.

Both the Free Times and the local paper Sundsvalls Tidning have previously reported on the now 20-year-old Somali man who last summer got away with 180 hours of youth service after having tricked Ida – at that point a 12-year-old girl – to his apartment in Sundsvall in Northern Sweden and subjected her to a bloody and prolonged rape.

“Black dick is expensive!” the Muslim man chanted while brutally raping the 12-year-old and beating her continuously in the face.

After the verdict was issued against the Somali rapist, however, Ida and her family, who have a Jewish background, continued to be harassed by the rapist's friends – a 16 year old Somali and his 18-year-old brother and mother – which Sundsvall Tidning reported on back in April. All three have restraining orders against the girl, but the Somalis continue to escape indictment, again and again .

“After the rape, they began to stalk my children, one by one, but all charges have been dropped. We have made over 20 complaints to the police but all charges have been dropped by the prosecutor,” Ida's father told the Free Times.

Since local authorities refuse to do anything about the situation, the family has now been forced to flee to Norway to seek refuge, the father told us.

The dropped charges include assault, sexual assault (for example, the Somalis flashed their genitals to the girl) and breach of restraining orders. The Muslim men also called Ida a "whore", beat her and threatened to kill her brother, according to the girl's father.

One of the most staggering cases of assault occurred on Holy Thursday this year at a bus stop.

“Ida was on her way home from school by bus, and the Somali brothers stepped out together with their mother. As soon as Ida left the bus they started chasing and beating her. One of the brothers knocked her in the back of her head and the other one hit her on her mouth and smashed her teeth. Their mother stood back and watched, and at the end she herself kicked the girl with her foot," Ida's father told Free Times.

The case attracted the attention of Sundsvall Tidning, a local newspaper that also published a picture of the girl's injuries. Moreover, there was a note from the hospital that described the damage the girl suffered. However, prosecutor Jens Göransson chose to discontinue the crime investigation.

When the Free Times first reached Göransson, he told us that he had no recollection of the case. When we reminded him that he had actually dropped the charges altogether, he said he could not remember why he had done so and explained that he was in the middle of a trial...."


Friday, September 23, 2016


From Ted Cruz's Facebook Page:

"This election is unlike any other in our nation’s history. Like many other voters, I have struggled to determine the right course of action in this general election.

In Cleveland, I urged voters, “please, don’t stay home in November. Stand, and speak, and vote your conscience, vote for candidates up and down the ticket whom you trust to defend our freedom and to be faithful to the Constitution.”

After many months of careful consideration, of prayer and searching my own conscience, I have decided that on Election Day, I will vote for the Republican nominee, Donald Trump.

I’ve made this decision for two reasons. First, last year, I promised to support the Republican nominee. And I intend to keep my word.

Second, even though I have had areas of significant disagreement with our nominee, by any measure Hillary Clinton is wholly unacceptable — that’s why I have always been #NeverHillary.

 photo cruz_endorses_Trump_zps8avzv6bt.jpg

Six key policy differences inform my decision. First, and most important, the Supreme Court. For anyone concerned about the Bill of Rights — free speech, religious liberty, the Second Amendment — the Court hangs in the balance. I have spent my professional career fighting before the Court to defend the Constitution. We are only one justice away from losing our most basic rights, and the next president will appoint as many as four new justices. We know, without a doubt, that every Clinton appointee would be a left-wing ideologue. Trump, in contrast, has promised to appoint justices “in the mold of Scalia.”

For some time, I have been seeking greater specificity on this issue, and today the Trump campaign provided that, releasing a very strong list of potential Supreme Court nominees — including Sen. Mike Lee, who would make an extraordinary justice — and making an explicit commitment to nominate only from that list. This commitment matters, and it provides a serious reason for voters to choose to support Trump.

Second, Obamacare. The failed healthcare law is hurting millions of Americans. If Republicans hold Congress, leadership has committed to passing legislation repealing Obamacare. Clinton, we know beyond a shadow of doubt, would veto that legislation. Trump has said he would sign it.

Third, energy. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s war on coal and relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry. Trump has said he will reduce regulations and allow the blossoming American energy renaissance to create millions of new high-paying jobs.

Fourth, immigration. Clinton would continue and even expand President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty. Trump has promised that he would revoke those illegal executive orders.

Fifth, national security. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism. She would continue importing Middle Eastern refugees whom the FBI cannot vet to make sure they are not terrorists. Trump has promised to stop the deluge of unvetted refugees.

Sixth, Internet freedom. Clinton supports Obama’s plan to hand over control of the Internet to an international community of stakeholders, including Russia, China, and Iran. Just this week, Trump came out strongly against that plan, and in support of free speech online.

These are six vital issues where the candidates’ positions present a clear choice for the American people.

If Clinton wins, we know — with 100% certainty — that she would deliver on her left-wing promises, with devastating results for our country.

My conscience tells me I must do whatever I can to stop that.

We also have seen, over the past few weeks and months, a Trump campaign focusing more and more on freedom — including emphasizing school choice and the power of economic growth to lift African-Americans and Hispanics to prosperity.

Finally, after eight years of a lawless Obama administration, targeting and persecuting those disfavored by the administration, fidelity to the rule of law has never been more important.

The Supreme Court will be critical in preserving the rule of law. And, if the next administration fails to honor the Constitution and Bill of Rights, then I hope that Republicans and Democrats will stand united in protecting our fundamental liberties.

Our country is in crisis. Hillary Clinton is manifestly unfit to be president, and her policies would harm millions of Americans. And Donald Trump is the only thing standing in her way.

A year ago, I pledged to endorse the Republican nominee, and I am honoring that commitment. And if you don’t want to see a Hillary Clinton presidency, I encourage you to vote for him."

This is absolutely great news. Ugly things have been said and done between these two strongmen, but the spectacle of the beaten 2nd man endorsing his victorious archfoe for the sake of a (far) greater cause than his personal career is a much more nicer thing to watch than the backstabbing on the other side. You may or may not recall that former DNC Chief Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who, like her Republican opponent Reince Priebus, actually should have stayed neutral with regards to the candidates for her party, in reality was scheming with Clinton from the get go to bring Sanders down.

When I look at the Right side - OUR side - I see the clashing of great egos, I hear nasty soundbites, but in the end...

... in the end it's no so bad. On OUR sites, like American Thinker, like Townhall, dissenting opinions of columnists pro and contra this or that candidate were/are allowed. On OUR side, OUR Chairman, Priebus, showed great dignity and stamina guiding his candidates' campaigns.

Even though I am not an American, I am proud of the GOP coming together at last. Seventeen candidates to start with, and it all ends with Trump. He's the strongest, the best horse we have in the race. I don't consider him a Conservative, far from. So be it. But of this I'm sure:

He loves America.



Thursday, September 22, 2016


Infowars' Alex Jones in an epic rant against the leftist/green cabals destroying the West from within.

If you think this guy has lost it, erm, no.

If anything, he's spot on and there are insufficient Alex Jones types.

I am a Belgian, a European, and I am in the fairly unique situation that I digest daily scores of BOTH leftist and rightwing news sources. The latter are practically solely from the other side of the Pond, since genuine rightwing news sources in Europe are as rare as liquor joints in Medina.

Anyway, when you get both sides of the story it's amazing - truly, heartbrakingly AMAZING - to see the shameless spin and omission of facts in leftwing media channels. The European population is being lied to on a daily basis to a truly EX-TRA-ORDI-NARY degree. Those few sites which bring the real story on a variety on subjects - like in Germany e.g. the indispensable PI News, mainly on the "refugee" crisis - are facing an daily battle that's so uphill it takes nerves of steel to continue it, such is the power of the Luegenpresse.


Wednesday, September 21, 2016


If you are a normal, decent Western person - i.e., feeling an absolutely normal attachment and pride to/in your Western civilization while all the while being cognizant of our flaws - and you want to become really angry, you might want to watch this insane, horrible ad, courtesy of a despicable Swedish multiculti outfit:

Never mind that up to 80 per cent of Swedish Police are reportedly considering to quit because of the dangers they face when confronting violent immigrants:

 photo swedish_police_quitters_zpskzlrhac7.jpg

Isn't it strange that this whole over-the-top leftist dada of multiculturalism is propagated only in the West??? Indeed, if multicultural is such a tremendously good thing, why shouldn't the whole world become multicultural? Why should only we Westerners benefit of its joys? We, who supposedly have taken and gotten so much already, to the detriment of others? Why not advocate the administering of a healthy dose of your typical western self-criticism, labor ethic, love of the arts and music, and a passion for technology to, say, Yemen? Wouldn't that be good for the country in question? Why does multiculturalism have to be a one-way street whereby only the West should change? Why would Vietnam, China, Egypt, Morocco, Indonesia, Brazil, Somalia et al remain exempt from the benefits of multiculturalism? Why would they be allowed to remain recognizably Vietnam, China, Egypt, Morocco, Indonesia, Brazil and Somalia??? Why is it only us who have to - indeed, HAVE TO - change???

Why can't we imagine the mayor of Islamabad saying something along the lines of "Jeminy, our capital is really too monocultural. That's so BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD. Too many people with a tan here. You know what, let's import 30,000 blond, six feet tall Swedes!!!"

But of course it doesn't work that way. Because you see, the lunatic leftist dogmas INSIST that everything that goes wrong on this planet is somehow the fault of this appalling White Creed, and we Westerners alone have to atone for our sins by drowning our own heritage.

The great irony is of course that IF multiculturalism DID work both ways, the good mayor of Islamabad would definitely strike a bargain, because he would suddenly have at his disposal a disciplined, highly trained and intelligent workforce which would respect the law, wouldn't defecate in the streets, and stiffen the government's wallets instead of draining them. Plus, instead of the real bombshells we get, he would see the streets in town brighten up with another kind of bombshells.

Take notice of the fact that the ad closes NOT with some typical blonde Swedish Agnetha-Fältskog-in-her-younger-years hottie, but with a female representative of the most gruesome belief system that has ever existed - islam.

She fled her Third World hellhole of a country, which was a hellhole because of her "faith" in the first place, and now she wants YOU, the Westerner, to accept this very same belief system in YOUR country.

If this belief system makes sufficient inroads, YOUR country will over time turn into the exact same basket case state she came from.

Especially muslims singularly fail to understand that they carry the seeds of their own mayhem and squalor with them and on them and that, like a cancer, these affect the host country... it is striking that NONE of the followers of the prophet - Piss be on him - seem to grasp the naked truth that once their "faith" is strong enough in the country of arrival, the government manna will invariably dry up after some time, after which it is back to square one like in the ole days in Afghanistan or Mali or Pakistan or whatever piss-poor excuse for a state where the moon cult reigns.

But then nobody has ever been able to accuse muslims of an excess of intelligence.

When you are done watching this vicious ad, you might want to email the scoundrels responsible for it, and tell them in no uncertain terms what you think of them. It's "IM", and it's headed by one Ann Svensén, "Secretary General":

 photo IM_sweden_zpsnafvtf1e.jpg

I just did. Here, I will make it easy for you:

Make it steam.

I count on you. Give those bastards HELL!!!


Monday, September 19, 2016


As you all know, or ought to know, except if you spent the previous six months in the north of Svalbard with only polar bears for company, H. Clinton used her private email server for official communications, instead of the official State Department mail accounts on federal servers. In this manner, thousands and thousands of emails with sensitive information, many of which would later be marked "classified" by the State Department retroactively, were "up for grabs" on the internet.

I run a small company, which has two email accounts, one of them a Gmail account.

I also have a private mail account.

There's not a hair on my head that thinks of using the private email account for company communications.

Yet here we have a woman who was Senator, then Secretary of State, and now aspires to be POTUS.

I... can't believe it.

Bill Whittle:

Hat tip Theo Spark.