Saturday, May 14, 2016

SATURDAY NIGHT THE J. GEILS BAND, THE TRAGICALLY HIP, EUROVISION SONG FESTIVAL.

The J. Geils Band with Centerfold. From the 1981 album Freeze Frame.




Rockers from Worcester, MA. Formed in 1967. Still around, be it after a couple of hiccups.



The Tragically Hip with Springtime in Vienna. From the 1996 album Trouble at the Henhouse.





Canadian alternative rock band from Kingston, Ontario.



Then it's Armenia. The country I mean. Is there even a band called Armenia? (whatever).

Anyway, Armenia, the last entry for the Eurovision Song Festival 2016, WON BIG TONIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!.

Uh, at Chateau Outlaw anyway:


 photo iveta_mukuchyan_zpsrcgha4js.jpg


This is Iveta Mukuchyan. She won. OK. For the jury composed of me, myself and I anyway. I don't have the foggiest idea what she sang about and I don't recall the melody, tune, lyrics whatever anymore but she definitely had the best legs!


Nite.


MFBB.

INSANE: SCOTLAND'S NEW MUSLIM MINISTER HUMZA YOUSAF, LINKED TO "GLORY TO ALLAH" LONDON BUS ADS, TAKES OATH BEFORE SCOTTISH PARLIAMANENT IN URDU.

Via Breitbart:


"Scotland’s Muslim Minister of Europe and International Development has been sworn into the new session of the Scottish Parliament, with the Pakistani-oricin Humza Yousaf choosing to take the oath to Her Majesty the Queen in his native language of Urdu.

Mr. Yousaf – who is on the hard left of his already strongly left-wing nationalist political party – recently commented that the majority of his party would like to see the abolition of the monarchy, and has previously been a spokesman for Islamic Relief, the charity behind the new “Glory to Allah” bus ads in London.

The swearing in ceremony took place on Thursday at Holyrood, the Scottish Parliament.

The Washington Post called his Urdu swearing in process as “an emphatic demonstration of British multiculturalism”, while Mr. Yousaf shot back at critics by stating that he took the oath in English first, and therefore there was no cause for concern.







Breitbart London has previously reported on the activities and beliefs of Mr. Yousaf, who has surged up the rankings to be one of the most influential left-wingers in the United Kingdom.

Previously, Mr. Yousaf has complained about receiving ‘Islamophobic’ tweets as a result of a Breitbart London article that simply reported his own wishes for Scotland. He is also known for his work in anti-Israel activism.

In September 2014, we wrote:


We know he studied politics in his hometown of Glasgow, and according to the Guardian he became involved in politics just after 9/11. He was firmly opposed to the wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and was prolific in the Stop The War movement, helping to organise coaches from Glasgow Central Mosque to the two million strong rally against the war in Iraq.

But Yousaf was willing to go further than his contemporaries to get what he wanted. The Guardian reports he joined a human blockade of the Charing Cross exit of the M8 motorway. In 2012 he described his experiences: “We had our two hours, freezing our arses off. And that was it: I was hooked.”

Initially he was attracted to the Scottish National Party’s opposition to the War on Terror, but he also became interested in its socialist views. Like many in the party he sees leaving the United Kingdom as a good way to push a much more left-wing agenda in Scotland.

English voters are far more conservative than the Scottish and are perceived to be holding them back from creating a Scandinavian-style socialist state. He once said that: “You have to keep being radical with your ideas”. His age, looks and charisma have undoubtedly made it easier to entice the Scottish into his “radical” agenda.

Prior to his election to the Scottish Parliament in 2011, Yousaf had been a media spokesman for Islamic Relief, a charity that has been accused on a number of occasions of being a front group for radical Islamism. Yousaf was a volunteer for Islamic Relief since the age of 10."


So Scotland's brand new "Minister for Europe and International Development" was a volunteer, later even spokesman, for islamic relief since the age of 10. But even though he was their mouthpiece, we can all be sure he never had an idea he was actually supporting Hamas, right?


Hmmmm...

Via The Gatestone Institute:


 photo islamic_relief_zps6m7enqra.jpg


"Islamic Relief Worldwide [IRW] is the poster-child of an exemplary Islamic charity. Headquartered in the UK, and given tens of millions of dollars by Western governments, the United Nations and the European Union, IRW consists of a "family of fifteen aid agencies" which "aim to alleviate the suffering of the world's poorest people." New information, however, indicates that IRW -- which counts Islamic Relief UK and Islamic Relief USA as its most important branches -- is an extremist organization with a pro-terror agenda. IRW has worked with a significant number of organizations linked to terrorism.

IRW's accounts show that it has partnered with a number of organizations linked to terrorism and that some of charity's trustees are personally affiliated with extreme Islamist groups that have connections to terror.

In 2006, the Israeli Ministry for Foreign Affairs designated IRW itself a terrorist front, and claimed that:

"The IRW provides support and assistance to Hamas's infrastructure. The IRW's activities in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip are carried out by social welfare organizations controlled and staffed by Hamas operatives. The intensive activities of these associations are designed to further Hamas's ideology among the Palestinian population."

In May of 2006, Israeli police arrested IRW's Gaza coordinator, Ayaz Ali. The Israeli government stated Ali had assisted Hamas-related institutions and groups such as Al Wafa and Al Tzalah, both of which are designated terror organizations in Israel. According to the Israeli government, Ali also said that he had cooperated with local Hamas operatives in Jordan:

"Incriminating files were found on Ali's computer, including documents that attested to the organization's ties with illegal Hamas funds abroad (in the UK and in Saudi Arabia) and in Nablus. Also found were photographs of swastikas superimposed on IDF symbols, of senior Nazi German officials, of Osama Bin Laden and Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, as well as many photographs of Hamas military activities … Ali admitted that he was aware that several of the organizations supported by the IRW in Judea, Samaria and Gaza were indeed identified with Hamas."



 photo humza_yousaf_zpsc7zia8g7.jpg

Once upon a time a fifth column was something that stayed in the dark. Now it's out in the open, plain for everyone to see.

OF COURSE you welcome refugees, muslim scoundrel. Because it will mean even more voting cattle to flush the kuffars out of Scottish institutions.


I have but one advice to UK and especially Scottish citizens - real ones, of course. Brits, Scots who care for their country, its values, and its heritage - and that advice is to boycott this muslim usurper at each and every occasion and to expose him and his terrorist supporting background wherever and whenever you can.


MFBB.

Friday, May 13, 2016

MUSLIM CANCER METASTIZES: FUNDRAISER FOR NEW AL HOUDA MOSQUE IN SINT-NIKLAAS, BELGIUM, IN NO TIME COLLECTS MORE THAN 1 MILLION EUR.

Leftist rag De Standaard is very happy to let the stupid Flemish peasants know that a fundraiser for the new al-Houda mosque in Sint-Niklaas, northern Belgium, has in no time amassed more than a million EUR.


 photo mosque_al_houda_zpsdf1ocuq7.jpg


"A fundraiser for a new mosque and community centre in Sint-Niklaas has amassed more than one million EUR, a record. The new building has to become twice as big as the previous one and aims, with its big windows, to emphasize an atmosphere of openness.

The plans for the new al-houda mosque in Sint-Niklaas have been in the pipeline for some time, but the required 2.5 million EUR were still lacking. Because there were no subsidies [for this particular project - MFBB], donations from the muslim community were called for.

The counter stood already on 1.8 million EUR, amongst others thanks to the six hundred families attending the mosque which contributed 2,000 EUR each to finance the new building. To bring up the rest a fundraiser was organised over the previous days by the nonprofit behind the mosque, the moroccan cultural and islamic centre. With a yield of more than one million EUR the nonprofit did better than expected..."





Fact 1 for you: In 2011, people of foreign extraction, of whom the overwhelming majority were muslims, especially from morocco, made up 21 per cent of Sint-Niklaas's 75,000 inhabitants.


Fact 2 for you: These 21 per cent received around 70 per cent of all welfare in Sint-Niklaas.


Fact No. 3 for you: since this picture is a blueprint for what happens all over the country, it is clear that Belgium's authochtons, dwindling in number and getting rapidly older, are literally financing their own destruction.




Below you see a Facebook message from a Sint-Niklaas muslim, presumably a member of the nonprofit behind the al-houda mosque:


 photo mosquesintniklaas_zpsvud5inkd.jpg


The message reads:


"Allahu akbar, this cake is made by a beautiful sister and has just been sold for 12,000 EUR.

May allah pbuh forgive all this sister's sins and give her the highest place in paradise inshallah!

Ameen"



The ardent zeal with which these usurpers manifestly express their religious feelings and are prepared to pay immense sums to erect the symbols of their conquest, should give serious cause for concern for every sane, freedom-loving Belgian.

Only a sheer and utter fool will believe that this latest building project for Flanders' biggest mosque to date is not another big FUCK YOU vis-à-vis all non-muslims. It is another step towards establishing the caliphate in this country.

Mark Steyn's mother is Belgian and from Sint-Niklaas. I wonder how the greatest present-day champion for Western Civilization and the Conservative Cause will take in the news that his mother's hometown is slowly turning into another Molenbeek.



MFBB.

RECOMMENDED READS: UZAY BULUT'S "TURKEY? IN THE EU?"

Some crucial insight on Erdogan's neo-Ottoman ambitions from an insider, Uzay Bulut, writing for The Gatestone Institute:


"TURKEY? IN THE EU?

On April 25, Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Simsek, while speaking at the High-Level EU-Turkey Economic Dialogue meeting in Istanbul, said that the full membership process to the European Union was Turkey's most crucial strategic target.

Simsek noted that Turkey will increase the quality of its institutions, strengthen the rule of law and complete the approximation process with Europe by running a reform process.

Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, however, has made affectionate statements expressing his admiration not for the European Union, but for the last Islamic caliphate -- the Ottoman Empire, an expansionist Islamic realm that committed massacres, rapes, and sexual slavery of people in the lands it invaded.

In Istanbul on May 30, 2015, in a public meeting celebrating the 562nd anniversary of the fall of Constantinople, Erdogan, sounded more like an Ottoman sultan than the leader of a NATO member nation.

He praised "hoisting the flag of Islam in Jerusalem again" and "stamping the seal of Islam on Al-Aqsa Mosque." According to some media outlets, two million people attended the event and cheered him.

"What is the conquest?" Erdogan asked his audience.


"The conquest is Hijrah [expansion of Islam through emigration, following the example of Muhammad, the founder of Islam, and his followers from Mecca to Medina]. The conquest is Mecca. It is to cleanse the Kaaba, the house of Allah on earth, of all the icons. The conquest is Jerusalem. It is when the prophet Omar stamped the seal of Islam on Al-Aqsa Mosque, our first Qibla [the direction to face when a Muslim prays during the five times daily prayers] while respecting all faiths including [those of] Christians and Jews.

"The conquest is Al-Andalus [Muslim Spain]. It is to build the most beautiful architecture, literature and culture of the world such as in Córdoba and Granada.

"The conquest is Samarkand [a city in present-day Uzbekistan and once a capital of the ancient Sogdian civilization whose main religion was Zoroastrianism.]

"The conquest is Bukhara [also in present-day Uzbekistan. It was a diverse city with Zoroastrian, Buddhist, Jewish and Nestorian Christian communities]. It is to establish one of the greatest civilizations of history in the steppes of Central Asia.

"The conquest is Salah al-Din al-Ayubbi [Saladin, who in 1187 invaded Jerusalem]. It is to hoist the flag of Islam in Jerusalem again.

"The conquest is Alp Arslan [the second Sultan of the medieval Muslim Seljuk Empire, who conquered Anatolia]."

"The conquest is to open the doors of Anatolia up to Vienna for this blessed nation. The conquest is Osman Ghazi [the first Ottoman Sultan]. It is to make the sycamore [the Ottoman Empire] meet with the ground that would cover three continents and seven climates through the enlightenment inspired by Sheikh Edebali who said, 'Make the human live so that the state can live'.

"The conquest is preparation. The conquest is when the Sultan Murad II abdicated the throne to his 12-year-old son, Mehmed II. And of course, the conquest is the Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror. It is, at age 21, to embrace Istanbul, the most favorite city of the world, after destroying the millennial Byzantium.

"Mehmed the Conqueror conquered Istanbul in 1453. But the conquests always continued before and after that. They continued with Sultan Selim I the Grim, Sultan Suleiman the Lawgiver, Sultan Murad IV, and Sultan Abdul Hamid II.

"The conquest is to have the courage, tenacity and sagacity to defy the entire world even at the hardest times.

"The conquest is 1994 [when Erdogan was elected mayor of Istanbul]. It is to serve Istanbul and the legacy of the Sultan Mehmed the Conqueror. The conquest is to make Turkey stand up on its feet again."


The crowd shouted, "Here is the army, here is the commander."


 photo erdogan-goatfucker_zpsbeti7na7.jpg



On April 14, the European Parliament sent a stern warning to Turkey, accusing the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) government of "backsliding" on democracy and the rule of law.

Kati Piri, rapporteur for Turkey at the European Parliament, said the regression in areas such as freedom of expression and the independence of the judiciary was "particularly worrying."

Ankara rejected the report, which cited references that the mass killings of Armenians under the Ottoman Empire constituted genocide, Turkish EU Affairs Minister Volkan Bozkir said.

"We will consider this report as null and void," Bozkir was quoted as saying by the state-run Anadolu Agency. "There is no moment in our history that we feel ashamed of. All of our archives are open. We believe this is an issue that should be decided by historians. Politicians should not write history."

On April 19, 2016 Erdogan's response to the EU report, according to the pro-government newspaper Yeni Akit, was loud and clear:


"The EU needs Turkey.

"That they presented such a report to us at a time when our relations with the European Union are going positively in many fields, such as immigrants, opening some chapters and visa liberalization, is simply a provocative approach, a provocative act. I guess Europeans will see that.

"They have not been able to see that since 1963. But I do not know what will happen from now on. The EU needs Turkey more than Turkey needs the EU. Let everyone know it like that. There is no need to go to further places to understand that. It is enough to look at the latest developments.

"The report has a crippled perspective on the issues of Cyprus and the Aegean Sea, the independence of judiciary, and the freedom of expression, press and assembly. These people [EU officials] do what their nature (disposition) requires them to. [In the report], there is also the part about the 1915 events which is utterly farcical."

Erdogan glorifies the Ottoman armies that reached the gates of Vienna, talks about the "good old times" when the Islamic flag was hoisted in Jerusalem, and aggrandizes Ottoman Sultans who were also caliphs.



Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan recently made affectionate statements expressing admiration not for the European Union, but for the last Islamic caliphate -- the Ottoman Empire, an expansionist Islamic realm that committed massacres, rapes, and sexual slavery of people in the lands it invaded. The question is when the EU will start acting like a self-respecting institution, and consider Turkey according to what it actually says and does?

Unfortunately the Turkish public's opinion of the EU is not that different from the Turkish government's. According to a 2014 PEW poll, around two-thirds of the Turks (66 %) expressed unfavorable views of the European Union. Turkish distaste for the West was not only about the EU. Nearly three-quarters (73%) also shared a dislike of their NATO ally, the U.S. In addition, 70% of the people of Turkey dislike NATO.

The question is when the EU will stop playing ostrich and start acting like a self-respecting institution. And when will the EU authorities take Turkey not according to their own wishful thinking, but according to what Turkey actually says and does?"



Uzay Bulut, a journalist born and raised a Muslim in Turkey, is currently based in Washington D.C.


MFBB.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

ABSOLUTELY RECOMMENDED VIDEO: VLAAMS BELANG CONGRESS "SUBMIT OR HIT BACK".

Many thanks to our dear friends at Gates of Vienna, who are doing the job I am supposed to do. A video with exerpts from key speakers, among them Tom Van Grieken, the new, young Party Chairman, Barbara Pas, and old acquaintances like Filip Dewinter and Anke Vandermeersch. About ten days ago, a Congress was held in Antwerp with the theme: "ISLAMIC TERROR: SUMBMIT OR HIT BACK".

I think that after watching this video, you will agree with me that VLAAMS BELANG chooses squarely for the latter option:




Here's the transcript:

"00:00 A fist against Islamic terror.
00:03 A fist of anger, because we will not stand for this terror, and we will hit back.
00:11 I have had enough of this; that just a few weeks after the terror attack
00:18 the political elite in this country are more worried about Muslims’ feelings
00:23 than for the victims and their relatives.
00:26 They haven’t even cleaned up before they are looking for reasons
00:30 for why we are at fault. Never is the guilt assigned to
00:34 The religion of conquest. No, again it takes upon itself the role of victim, supported by “gutmenschen”,
00:39 who in this manner first and foremost try to wins souls and votes.
00:44 Already Europe has endured a long list of bloody Islamic terror attacks;
00:49 Madrid 2004. Four bombs on a train, 192 dead, almost 2000 injured.
00:59 London 2005. Four bombs on busses and the metro. 52 dead and over 700 injured.
01:08 Paris 2015. Six bombs, 130 dead and over 350 injured.
01:18 Brussels. 32 dead and over 340 injured.
01:23 And the list of murders is also long, such as the murder of Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam.
01:29 The murder of a rabbi and three school children in a Jewish school in Toulouse.
01:35 The murder of the 25-year old soldier Lee Rigby in London.
01:40 The murder of four visitors to the Jewish museum in Brussels.
01:45 The murder of 12 people at Charlie Hebdo publishers in Paris.
01:51 The list is slowly but surely becoming endless.
01:55 Our society is today paying an almost unbearable price
02:00 for the historic mistake of letting tens of thousands guest workers grow into the hundreds of thousands.
02:07 and in Europe several million new migrants,
02:12 either outright illegal, or would-be asylum seekers.
02:17 The 22nd of March, dear friends, the 22nd of March,
02:23 Hundreds of people hurt, 32 people murdered.
02:30 And it wasn’t global warming or a lack of possibilities on the job market that killed them.
02:35 Neither was it the so called “racism” in our society, nor was it pollution,
02:39 …but Muslim terror that killed them.
02:43 A strong justice system would have been able to prevent this.
02:47 A strong immigration policy would have been able to prevent this.
02:51 A well-equipped intelligence agency could have prevented this.
02:55 But first and foremost our politicians had the damned responsibility to prevent this.
03:00 Dear friends, there will be no “European Islam”. The only thing we will get is an Islamized Europe.
03:08 Europe does not change the Muslims. The Muslims are changing Europe, and fast.
03:14 In other words, dear friends, Islam…
03:20 In other words, dear friends, Islam is not a part of the solution, Islam is the essence of the problem.
03:30
03:33 That beaten and raped women in Islamic culture are always seen
03:37 as the guilty party instead of the victims
03:41 is the sickening result of the perverse sexual morality of the Muslim man.
03:46 History teaches us that the degree of a Islamization in a society
03:53 is directly reflected in the degree of how much Muslim women have to cover their bodies.
03:59 The more Islam, the more textiles worn by women, and the less freedom they have.
04:06 The advance of Islam means in practice social, economic and cultural regression.
04:14 Poverty, lack of learning, social exclusion, discrimination and lack of opportunity
04:20 are not the reason for Islam. They are the result of Islam.
04:27
04:32 And when history repeats itself, when the asses who are leading us,
04:38 deaf and blind to public opinion, as if they are covering their eyes and ears,
04:47 repeat the same actions with an insane “Wir schaffen das” policy,
04:53 when they want to admit Islamic Turkey to the EU, then we call for resistance.
04:58 We will tell you what is going on, regardless of what people think about us
05:02 and regardless of political correctness.
05:06 And the more we are ignored, the more we are undermined and demonized,
05:10 the more driven we become, and we are proud of it, by the way.
05:16 Together with the Austrian FPÖ, together with the Italian Lega Nord,
05:21 Marine Le Pen’s Front National and Geert Wilders’ PVV,
05:25 we will mobilize public opinion. And to the people of foreign background already here in Flanders,
05:30 and who want to be Flemish together with the Flemish, we still reach out our hand,
05:36 but for the others, the people who hate us, we have entirely different plans.
05:42 If there is something called integration, then there must also be something called “outegration”.
05:48 The slogan Kemal Ataturk in his time left as a testament to his people was:
05:54 “Turkey for the Turks”. Of course, but then also “Flanders for the Flemish” and “Europe for the Europeans”.
06:06 I am tired of this. I am more than tired, dead tired, and I think you are, too.
06:12 We must fight back and resist. It is the only thing we CAN do.
06:15 As peaceful but battle-ready citizens we have a duty to make our European civilization —
06:21 which we inherited from our parents and forefathers — safe for our children and grandchildren.
06:28 It is our duty to protect our identity, our sovereignty and our freedom.
06:32 It is our damned duty to make it clear to those who threaten our achievements
06:38 that we will not tolerate it. I can promise you, ladies and gentlemen,
06:42 that we, Vlaams Belang, will work on this.
06:47 More than ever before. With even more passion and even more fervor,
06:53 we will keep fighting for our identity, our traditions and our way of life.
06:57 I am also counting on you. It will not be a bed of roses, but one thing I know with certainty:
07:04 As long as there is a Vlaams Belang on the field, the battle is not lost.
07:10 Today we stand here with the choice of either painfully going down, or fighting back.
07:15 Vlaams Belang clearly chooses the latter option.
07:19 We will no longer submit to Islamic terror, but will now hit back with force! …Thank you!"



I am so GODDAM PROUD to be a part of this movement, to be a member of this party. Vlaams Belang embodies the quintessential strength, innovation, passion and pride of my people, the Flemish. After seeing this video, you have gotten a glimpse of the fierce, indomitbale spirit which made Flanders "the cockpit of Europe" in medieval and far into modern times. That spirit is still there, and Vlaams Belang is its herald.


MFBB.

Sunday, May 08, 2016

LONDON'S NEW MAYOR SADIQ KHAN'S UNHEALTHY TIES TO MUSLIM EXTREMISTS.

Over here as in the UK the MSM are swooning over London's first ever muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan. What we get are the feelgood stories about his humble past (son of a busdriver and all).

What we do not get is Paul Weston's revelations. Via our buddies at Gates of Vienna:


The Innocence of Sadiq Khan
by Paul Weston

"When the prevailing ethos of a country’s political and media class is one of insanity and/or national suicide, no one should be too surprised when what was once thought unthinkable becomes a sudden and shocking reality. A good example of this is the crowning of Sadiq Khan as Mayor of London, which could be compared in terms of lunacy to the appointment of Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn as Chairman of the Friends of Israel Society.

Sadiq KhanI don’t necessarily think the smoothly urbane and thoroughly slippery Sadiq Khan is a potential leader of armed Islamic insurrection in London, but nor do I believe he is the benign and unthreatening sort of awfully-nice-Muslim-next-door-chappy that the BBC et. Al. would like us to believe. After all, if judged by the company Sadiq Khan has kept, he would appear to be yet another one of those Muslim politicians who say one thing to their Eloi English audience and quite another to their own community when well out of infidel earshot.

Consider the following: Mr Khan’s brother-in-law, Makbool Javaid, was a supporter of the terrorist organisation Al-Muhajiroun which became notorious for its September 2002 conference “The Magnificent 19” praising the September 11, 2001 attacks. Mr Javaid appeared alongside some of the country’s most infamous hate preachers, and in 1998 his name appeared on a fatwa calling for a “full-scale war of jihad” against Britain and the US.

Mr Khan’s brother-in-law went on to become head of Litigation Services at the Commission for Racial Equality… the further one looks down the multicultural rabbit hole of Britain, the more surreal the whole thing becomes. Mr Javaid is currently a partner at legal firm Simons Muirhead and Burton and lists amongst his Facebook friends CAGE director Moazzam Begg and fellow director Asim Qureshi, who described the Islamic State butcher Jihadi John as a “beautiful young man”. Sadiq Khan is intimately connected with all of these people, which is not something that could be said of Boris Johnson, London’s previous and altogether different type of Mayor.


Modern Multicultural Britain

Sadiq Khan was on the board of the “civil liberties” pressure group Liberty (NCCL) for three years, along with a certain Mr Azad Ali, who has excused the murder of British soldiers and was involved with the extremist organisations Islamic Forum of Europe and Jamaat e Islami. Azad Ali is currently Head of Community Development & Engagement at the organisation MEND which seeks to undermine the British government’s counter-terrorism strategy. And speaking of going down surreal rabbit holes, Azad Ali is an adviser to the police and Home Office on police procedure, a member of the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and sits on the Home Office’s Trust and Confidence Community Panel… and last but not least is a board member of the extremist boot-boy outfit Unite Against Fascism, which is also supported by the British Prime Minister David Cameron…


The Mayor of London has peculiar friends, it must be said, but who could possibly know just how many? Sadiq Khan has represented the Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan, who — just in case people have forgotten — called for the mass murder and destruction of the white race. In addition, Khan has defended the Taliban supporter Babar Ahmad, the Saudi Arabian “charity worker” Shaker Aamer and the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood Yusuf al Qaradawi, who called the murder of Israeli civilians a legitimate act. Strange bedfellows all, it really has to be said.

Sadiq Khan explains all this away as part and parcel of life within the civil rights world, but all those he defends seem to have a particular set of political ideals and a particular religious/racial background. I have searched for details with regard to the Mayor of London ever having defended the human rights of Sgt Blackman (Marine A) or Tommy Robinson, but my searches have sadly come to nought. Sadiq Khan has no time for patriotic Englishmen, it would seem, which is somewhat unfortunate for the non-Muslim population of London…

Mr Khan’s speechwriter Shueb Salar has finally been sacked for all sorts of vile outbursts on Twitter concerning homosexuality and women (faggots and ho’s as described by Mr Salar) and other such bugbears of Islamic prejudice — which included the suggestion that Fusilier Lee Rigby’s murder had been faked. But Sadiq Khan only got round to sacking him after the media shamed him into doing so. Considering London has more than its fair share of “faggots and hoes’ in Islamic eyes, one can only wonder how the new Mayor will treat them…

The Mayor of London has so many links to so many unpleasant people and organisations, it becomes incredibly boring transcribing them in their entirety. I suggest people read this one article which covers Sadiq Khan’s alliance with the extremist Islamic student organisation FOSIS, his praise for the Islam Channel despite its being constantly fined for promoting radicalisation, and his apparent inability to recognise the black flag of Islam as a terrorist symbol after it was waved by an audience member during a Sadiq Khan speech.


 photo sadiq_khan_ties_extremists_zps4t9bmdt4.jpg



In 2004 Sadiq Khan was Chairman of the Muslim Council of Britain’s (MCB) legal affairs committee. Those in the know were already talking about the MCB as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood, but it took another five-years before the Labour government finally got around to recognising it as such and dropping it like a hot potato.


Shariah for the UK

There is far more out there about Khan’s strange past if you are prepared to search for it, but I think we can reasonably concur that whilst he may not actually be a supporter of Islamic terror, he is most certainly not the sort of man who should be Mayor of London. The fact that he took his oath on the Koran when he was first elected as an MP tells us all we need to know about his true allegiance, as does his attitude toward moderate Muslims, whom he described on Iran’s Press TV channel as Uncle Toms.

And so the previously unthinkable has become the present reality. A Muslim man with way too many extremist links to be entirely coincidental is now the Mayor of London. I suppose this is hardly a shock, though. The native English are a demographic minority (and a rapidly dwindling one) in London, whilst Muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh are a rapidly expanding demographic.

In a couple more decades Britain may well have its first Muslim Prime Minister, and I think we can safely assume he will be of the same ideological stock as Sadiq Khan. Reality cannot argue with demographics, so the realistic future for Britain is Islamic, which doesn’t bode well for the Jews and Christians, or indeed anyone not actually Muslim. They might wake up in time, but I rather doubt it.

Why do I rather doubt it? David Cameron was denounced as a racist by white native Britons for raising concerns about Sadiq Khan’s past, and I will leave you with a taste of our probable future courtesy of Andrew Boff, Conservative leader of the Greater London Assembly, who stated that criticism of Mr Khan’s myriad links with extremists was:

“Effectively saying that people of conservative religious views are not to be trusted and you should not share a platform with them. That’s outrageous… I do believe it’s going to affect Conservatives at the sharp end, especially in those parts of London where there is a high Muslim population.”

Do you understand what he means by this? I do. He is saying the Conservative Party is aware of the growing power of Islam in Britain, and that rather than confront the extreme elements of it, politicians should instead get on their knees before it.

And until there is a revolution (or more accurately a counter-revolution) in Britain, that is exactly what will happen. We will continue to submit, even as we watch France, Germany, Holland, Sweden and ALL the ex-Communist Central European countries currently rising up in a concerted and organised political manner against Islam.

In order to fully lose your country, you first have to lose your capital city. Sadiq Khan, a Muslim with countless extremist links, won 44% of the vote. UKIP won a mere 4%. We have now lost London in religious, racial, political and cultural terms, so it is up to us as to whether we go on to lose our country. What are you going to do about it?

In point of fact, what is Nigel Farage and UKIP going to do about it? Write a letter to The Daily Telegraph?

Even better, how about writing a letter to the new Mayor of London?"



Paul Weston is a British-based writer who focuses on the damage done to Western Civilisation by the hard left’s ongoing cultural revolution, which seeks to destroy the Christian, capitalist and racial base of the West. He is now one of the leaders of PEGIDA UK, and is also the leader of Liberty GB.



Londoners, you broke it. You own it.


MFBB.