DISASTER: SALAH ABDESLAM ARREST THE PERFECT SMOKESCREEN FOR TURKEY FORCING IT'S WAY INTO THE EU.

Sultan Erdogan and his PM Ahmet Davutoglu must be the luckiest men on Earth.

Because if you thought the arrest of Salah Abdeslam in Molenbeek today was the scoop of the day...




... you would be mistaken.

The big news today was the EU/Turkey "deal" which boils down to Turkey effectively determining what the EU does, and having it pay for it. The photo shows three complete idiots and an islamic supremacist barely able to hide his glee at having utterly and completely fooled his speaking partners:



The three idiots are Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission, the EU's executive branch, to the left. Then Donald Tusk, a former Polish PM, now President of the European Council (a function sometimes referred to as EU President), third from left. Finally Mark Rutte, the Dutch PM, to the right.

The islamic supremacist is Ahmet Davutoglu, Turkish PM, the grinning goon second from left.


This "deal" is a sham of cosmic proportions, because Europe is caving away on key negotiating points and receives back from Ankara... NOTHING. Zilch. Nada. Zero.

Via Reuters:

"Under the pact, Ankara would take back all migrants and refugees, including Syrians, who cross to Greece illegally across the sea. In return, the EU would take in thousands of Syrian refugees directly from Turkey and reward it with more money, early visa-free travel and faster progress in EU membership talks.

Migrants who arrive in Greece from Sunday will be subject to being sent back once they have been registered and their individual asylum claim processed. The returns are to begin on April 4, as would resettlement of Syrian refugees in Europe.

While many in Brussels hailed the agreement as a game-changer, Amnesty International decried it as a "historic blow to human rights", saying Europe was turning its back on refugees.

"Guarantees to scrupulously respect international law are incompatible with the touted return to Turkey of all irregular migrants," the rights advocacy group said, criticizing Ankara's track-record on human rights.

"Turkey is not a safe country for refugees and migrants, and any return process predicated on it being so will be flawed, illegal and immoral."

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte sought to reverse the narrative, saying the idea was to discourage illegal and perilous voyages across the Aegean and open legal paths to Europe instead.

"There is nothing humanitarian in letting people, families, children, step on boats, being tempted by cynical smugglers, and risk their lives," he said.

DOABLE?

The EU would also accelerate disbursement of 3 billion euros already pledged in support for refugees in Turkey and provide a further 3 billion by 2018. It would help Greece set up a task force of some 4,000 staff, including judges, interpreters, border guards and others to manage each case individually.

"All new irregular migrants crossing from Turkey into Greek islands as from 20 March 2016 will be returned to Turkey. This will take place in full accordance with EU and international law, excluding any kind of collective expulsion," the deal said.

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said it would be a Herculean task for Greece to handle the returns and the chairman of the EU leaders' summits, European Council President Donald Tusk, said the deal was not a silver bullet.

"Reality is more complex," Tusk said, noting a broader EU strategy to control migration that included keeping the land route from Greece to Germany closed to irregular migrants.

Just as the deal was clinched, Turkey said it had intercepted hundreds of migrants trying to reach the Greek island of Lesbos.

"It's a historic day today because we reached a very important agreement between Turkey and the EU," Davutoglu said. "Today we realized that Turkey and EU have the same destiny, the same challenges and the same future."

In effect, the EU swallows hook, line and sinker Turkey's RIDICULOUS "One for One Scheme": every migrant and refugee crossing illegally into Greece, will be taken back by Turkey.

In exchange, however, the EU will accept for each and everyone belonging to said category... a "real" refugee from the war in Syria, properly processed and sent on its way by Erdogan.

The "One for One System" is such an unbelievable and obvious fraud that it defies description how all the bright and enlightened gentlemen and -women in Europe's power channels could ever have fallen for this.

The net result will be just...


... NOTHING.


There will be no letup in the flow of "refugees" to Europe. One for one. A bloke landing on a Greek island in a dinghy will be transported back to the Turkish border, "taken back", and his brother who preferred to drink mint tea near a Turkish guardhouse will be let in.

That's it. One for One.


And what does Turkey get in return, you will ask?


1.) 3 billion more EUR on top of the 3 billion already pledged to support Turkey's refugee processing infrastructure. In effect, even facilitating the flow of paradise seekers through Anatolia direction Germany!!!


2.) 80 million Turks will be allowed to enter the EU without visa.


3.) The negotiations to let enter Turkey the EU will be stepped up.


If that's a deal, I'm the Wizard of Oz. I am beyond belief that Europes indigenous populations don't take to the streets with pitchforks, drag the cowardly bastards who betrayed 500 million people to the new Ottoman Empire out of their gleaming palaces, and hang them from the trees in Brussels' Warandepark.


I never considered myself a conspiracy theorist, but that scoundrel of a Salah Abdeslam is getting caught JUST TODAY.... INSTANTLY GETTING WORLD COVERAGE... AT THE VERY MOMENT THAT FIVE KILOMETERS FURTHER A CONTINENT WAS SOLD OUT TO SULTAN ERDOGAN...

... well, that strikes me as more than a simple coincidence.

This is a nightmare, plain and simple. Europe pledged all, Turkey gave nothing back. To the contrary, it made Europe pay for caving in to Turkish demands! This is the equivalent of walking into a Mercedes garage, choosing the hottest car, and having the garage management PAY YOU the vehicle's value! It's, this is, this is...


.... DUMBFOUNDING.


Why is it that no one seems to see that the "refugee crisis", which is first and foremost a crisis of the muslim world's own making, is a godsend for Turkey, a means to extract from Europe what it has been craving for decades, become a member of the EU club with all the privileges that that entails? And all this by playing on European politicians' pathological self-hate, only matched by their gross historical ignorance.

No, I'm too mild in my assessment.

It looks rather that Turkey is set to get what it has craved for CENTURIES....

.... EUROPE ITSELF.

Today, it has been made crystal clear that Europe's much vaunted "soft power" isn't worth shit.

It cannot even hold back dinghies.

If a Turkey that is as yet not part of the European Union - at least formally - is even so already capable of letting Europe dance to its tunes at will...

... then how will it be once Turkey is INSIDE the EU???

333 years ago, at dawn on September 12, 1683, the Polish King John III Sobieski appeared out of the morning mist before Vienna and with his winged Hussars descended upon the Ottoman army laying siege to the city. So devastating was the Turkish defeat that the Ottoman probes into Europe stopped and the empire started its long decline into oblivion. Europe was allowed to live and thrive and give to the world unfathomable riches in the fields of technology, art, medicine, and ultimately democratic governance of states by and for the people.

In 2016, John III Sobieski's present-day successor in the person of Donald Tusk, the laughably named "President of the European Union", gave the keys of Europe to the Ottomans on a silver platter, and for good measure paid for them too.

If John III Sobieski could somehow come back and see for himself how Donald Tusk and company just flushed Europe's future down the crapper, I bet he would pull his hussar sword and hack those ignorant, irresponsible fools to death.

And it would be richly deserved.



MFBB.

RECOMMENDED READS: PROF. PHYLLIS CHESLER'S "HOW LONG UNTIL ARABS AND MUSLIMS RULE, BRITANNIA?"

Writing for Arutz Sheva, Israel International News, Professor Phyllis Chesler has a compelling piece titled "How long until Arabs and Muslims rule, Britannia?"

England: Shakespeare's heroic fairy realm; the world of Blake, Milton, Keats, Byron, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Austen, the Brontes, George Eliot, Charles Dickens, and Virginia Woolf.

England: The country of William Wilberforce, who successfully fought to abolish the slave trade; the land of the bravest suffrage movement anywhere; Churchill's own country--that fair and glorious Kingdom is still there but it is also fraying, fading away.

I've just returned from a visit to this storied Isle. I saw the most sublime production of "The Tempest" at The Sam Wanamaker/Globe Theater; a wondrous production of "As You LIke It" at the National Theater; and a riveting performance of Bellini's opera about the Druid priestess, "Norma," at the Coliseum. Every seat was filled by Brits of all ages. High Culture still lives on there--and yet, London is no longer as I first encountered it in 1961 or again, in 1969, or even in 1989.

Now, all London only dares whisper about the Arab and Muslim takeover of their city. Nearly every single luxury hotel is owned by the Sultan of Brunei, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia as is the historic department store Harrods. (Dodi Al-Fayed's father, an Egyptian, bought it long ago when he envisioned his son marrying Princess Diana, the mother of the future King of England).

The best townhouses on Park Lane, in Hyde Park, Belgravia, Mayfair, and Knightsbridge now belong to Arab Embassies, oil-rich sheiks, and the occasional Russian oligarch.

Nearly every single luxury hotel is owned by the Sultan of Brunei, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia as is the historic department store Harrods...
Londoners who still "take tea" in the lobbies of the grand hotels, tell me in soft, resigned voices that "this is how it is and there is nothing that can be done about it. Speak out and you will fall into immediate disfavor."

I know several exceptionally gallant, truth-telling thinkers and writers in London who are now blacklisted, censored, their powers curtailed. They dared tell the truth about how biased against America and Israel the British media and professoriate are--and how irrationally they favor both Islam and Islamism.

However, as one life-long Londoner pointed out to me: "Harrods, which is also owned by Arabs, (al-Fayed sold it to Qatar), loses business nine months of the year and only survives because Arabs come on shopping expeditions in the summer to escape the desert heat." London's Fortum and Mason's, the most luxurious store in the world, now has its first stand-alone satellite store in Dubai.

A limousine driver tells me that he routinely picks up exceedingly short fur coats that cost $65,000.00 for Arab women and that "once, a Saudi Prince left 3 million pounds in the boot (trunk) of my car. He completely forgot about it."

A professor from Oxford comes down to visit me. She tells me about the "Asian (Pakistani) grooming gangs" in Oxford and about how 378 very young Caucasian infidel girls were pimped out by these gangs in Oxford alone.

"Finally, after many years, the pimps were arrested and sentenced and the failure of the police to stop them was excoriated in open court. The English Defense League mounted a brave, civil rights protest right in front of the police station. The police cordoned them off, surrounded them with barking dogs and a line of police officers who let no one near enough to hear what they had to say. And then they loosed the Anti-Fascist League against them who came rushing down the street, hollering "Nazi, fascist scum."

As Orwell understood, not all speech is equal.




(image via Pamelageller.com)


The streets are filled with women in heavy hijab, in Niqab, (face masks), and in black, burqa-like body bags. As I have written many times before: I have no quarrel with head coverings but suggest that the West must draw the line at face masks and sensory deprivation isolation chambers which burqas truly are. These "covered" women are flying the flag of Jihad, of a barbaric version of patriarchy--which is now increasingly ensconced within Britain's gates.

The West's dependence on Big Oil together with its own blind commitment to cultural sensitivity, an allegedly anti-racist tolerance for the barbarian "other," and fearfulness about the consequences of speaking out--have together brought this about.

Some say that just as England once colonized the Middle East, the Indian sub-continent, Central Asia, and the Far East that now, the favor is being returned; the Islamic world is giving the colonizing Mother Country a taste of its own well deserved medicine.

Tragically, this means that infidel women are sexual prey; that their rape, sexual harassment, and sexual slavery is being done quite openly, publicly--just as it is done in the Muslim world.

It means that the luxury hotels all offer a "halal" option; that certain British government offices are run as Sharia enterprises.

The British nationalists and the Islamists agree on one thing and one thing only: That the Jews are the greatest oppressors and conspirators in the world; that "Palestine" is the most oppressed (non-) country in the whole wide world; and that this must be screamed out loud in the mosques, on the streets, in the media, and in the universities. Please read Carol Gould and Melanie Phillips for starters if you have not already done so.

Recently, I wrote about a British documentary made possible by the hard work of a Turkish-born nun, Sister Hatune Dogan. She opened every door for the British filmmakers, gentled the sex slaves whom she and her networks had rescued from ISIS and translated their words for the filmmaker.

Despite all promises to the contrary, Sister Hatune and her foundation were completely dropped from the film. When I finally got the producer on the phone, she admitted to me that "the film could not afford to be associated with such a racist Islamophobe, that it would ruin their chances for recognition and prizes"--and when I questioned her further, she quickly began yelling, then screaming after which she hung up on me in breathtaking fashion.

Yes, there is some "fight back." Britain has the power to return Muslim girls whose families have kidnapped them to Pakistan for forced marriages--that's if they can find them. Just as I was leaving, I read that a couple were arrested at Heathrow Airport for having taken their eight year old girl back to Somalia to have her genitals mutilated; doing so, is against the law.

Will Britain, will all Europe, fight to remain Western countries? Or, hoisted on their own petard of political correctness, will they simply become vassal states of Islam?

To be or not to be - that is the question.

Indeed.

RESIST AND FIGHT BACK!!!


MFBB.

BREAKING: SHOOTOUT IN BRUSSELS BETWEEN POLICE AND MUSLIM TERRORISTS. UPDATE: ONE TERRORIST KILLED, IS FLAG FOUND, TWO TERRORISTS ON THE RUN

Elite antiterror units of Belgian Police, together with some French colleagues, raided a terrorist safehouse in Vorst, a commune in Brussel's southwest.

At the time of writing, 7.15pm, this much is clear: one terrorist suspect has been killed, and three officers wounded. The terrorists returned fire with automatic weapons, probably AK-47s. The operation would not have been aimed at grabbing Salah Abdeslam, who is being pursued since the November terrorist attacks in Paris.






Two suspects would be on the run.

More later.

UPDATE: press conference by PM Charles Michel yesterday




The same evening PM Charles Michel held a press conference during which several details were revealed that shed another light on the events. It turned out that initially there were no elite antiterror units involved. The first two wounded among the police fell among regular officers conducting a routine house search in Vorst. Yet upon ringing at the door of the particular apartment in Vorst, they were met by a volley of fire through the door. It appears that by chance, they had stumbled upon a sleeping cell.

It was only then that an antiterror unit was deployed and streets cordoned off. There were also some French officers involved. On the images released thus far, they are the ones wearing uniforms back-stenciled with "Police" only. Belgian police - at least those from precincts and units in the capital - have uniforms and clothing with "Politie - Police".

In the ensuing shootout the terrorists used automatic weapons. One of them was killed, a 35 year old Algerian, Mohammed Belkaïd, staying illegally in Belgium. Two more officers were wounded, but again not critical.

Michel stated "that a drama had been avoided".

It might well be, given the affiliation of the terrorists. Today, Eric Van Der Sypt, a spokesman for the Federal Prosecutor, revealed that in the dead terrorist's apartment salafist literature and an IS flag had been found - apart from a Kalashnikov and eleven spare magazines. The floor was littered with numerous shell casings.



Van Der Sypt said that during numerous house searches nearby another Kalashnikov in a building not far from the safehouse was found. Also, some spare magazines and black clothing.

Two suspects managed somehow to escape - in all likelihood they received help in this "multicultural" quarter.

The nearby Audi plant was closed prematurely, and in two schools the pupils were not allowed to go home at normal closing time. they had to wait for an all clear signal that came later in the evening.

This is what the famous multicultural enrichment boils down to. Hundreds of thousands of euros blown through in a single afternoon and evening for staging an antiterror operation, blocking entire neighborhoods and traffic, halting a factory, and closing schools for good measure. Your Infidel tax euros at work!

Thanks but no thanks to our moral betters the greens and socialists AND basically all their comrades in the traditional parties.




MFBB.

SURE, GIVE ALL 80 MILLION OF THEM VISAS TO THE EU - "ORDINARY" TURKISH MUSLIMS VOW TO KILL NON-BELIEVERS.

Shocking - erm, well... not for me! - video of Ahmed Q in the Turkish street:




If all goes well, the EU/Turkey "deal" will be sealed this week, and then the fine gentlemen in the video above will be able to enter the EU without visa and roam around at will. Splendid!!!


At the EU/Turkey summit in Brussels last week, Turkish PM Davutoglu last week outlined his "plan" to solve the "refugee" crisis as follows:


a.) Turkey will take back the "economic" refugees from the EU, i.e. those who do not come from a war zone where their lives are in imminent danger... on a "One for One" basis. What does that mean? Oh, it means that for every "economic" refugee Turkey will accept again from Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Sweden and so on, Turkey will send a "real" one back.

I kid you not.

And who gets to decide who is a "real" refugee? Why, Turkey of course!!!


b.) As a reward, Turkey asks 3 billion EUR more (on top of the 3 billion already pledged by the EU) to set up/maintain the camps on its territory.

c.) PLUS, it wants free entry of its 80 million citizens to the EU WITHOUT VISA.

d.) PLUS, it wants the negotiations for Turkey's entry into the EU accelerated.



This "deal" boils down to the following.

Suppose, your neighbor has a beautiful wife, a brand new Mercedes sports car, and a magnificent villa.

You broker a deal with your neighbor:



a.) You can have sex with your neighbor's wife whenever it pleases you.

b.) You can use his Mercedes at will.

c.) In the weekends, you can stay at his place for free.

d.) In exchange, your neighbor pays you 6,000 EUR a year.


That's the EU/Turkey deal in a nutshell.


Mind you, our "elites", Madame Merkel first and foremost, accept this "deal".


MFBB.

SATURDAY NIGHT THE B-52s, BRYAN FERRY.

The B-52s with Dirty back road. From their second album ("the Red Album") Wild Planet (1980).




Originally a New wave band, formed in 1976 in Athens, Georgia. And still around.



Bryan Ferry with Heart on my Sleeve.




From his 1976 album Let's stick together.



Slaap wel.


MFBB.

DENMARK'S JEPPE JUHL REVEALS: A FULL 77.2% OF MUSLIMS IN DENMARK SUPPORT SHARIA LAW.

Courtesy Gates of Vienna, an eye-popping - at least for those who were asleep over the past 15 years or so - revelation in Jeppe Juhl's next Newspeek installment:



Many thanks to Tania G. for the translation, and as per usual to Vlad Tepes for the subtitles!


So, in 2006, 62.4 per cent of muslims in Denmark thought that the koran had to be followed to the letter, i.e. they were for sharia law.

By 2015, that number had risen to... 77.2 per cent.

But that's but one sobering statistic among many.


How much longer shall we allow our traitor political class and our whorenalists allow to drag an entire continent to the abyss?

Isn't it long past time to get out the pichforks and install the gallows?


MFBB.

UH-OH: RADICALIZATION IN FRENCH POLICE BECOMING A PROBLEM.

Via French daily Le Parisien, 9 March 2016: "Radicalization: Police not spared":





The Local writes:

RADICALIZATION AMONG POLICE A GROWING CONCERN FOR FRANCE.

Published: 09 Mar 2016 11:18 GMT+01:00

A leaked memo has revealed that not even the French police is spared from the phenomenon of radicalization or fundamentalism, with a number of cases highlighted in recent years.


"While the numbers are tiny compared to the number of police in Paris, the internal memo has revealed that there were 17 cases between 2012 and 2015 of officers in Paris demonstrating behaviour or acts that concerned their superiors.

Around one third of the cases involved women and four of them were officers who have converted to Islam. None of the cases highlighted involve high-ranking officers.

There are no figures for the number of cases across the country.

Le Parisien newspaper, which revealed the leaked memo, claimed the officers were identified for acts such as refusing to stand guard outside a synagogue or refusing to respect a minute's silence. One officer even put out a call to murder on Facebook, which landed him in court, Le Parisien claimed.

The newspaper claimed police in Paris were now recording "transgressions" on a weekly basis.

Stanislas Gaudon, from the police union Alliance, told The Local that while they couldn’t talk about or confirm the individual cases, most were related to disobeying the police's strict rules around secularism.

While the incident maybe something as minor as an officer observing daily Muslim prayers or wearing religious clothing at work, police are forced to take it seriously given the heightened terror threat and huge concern about the number of French people being radicalized.

The fact that officers are armed and have access to police files means the Ministry of Interior has to take the utmost caution, said Gaudon.

“This phenomenon was a concern back in 2014, which is why the Ministry of Interior asked for particular attention to be paid to it,” Gaudon told The Local.

“There are rules in place that forbid officers from demonstrating their religious conviction at work. Officers are closely watched by their superiors and police chiefs in Paris and if an individual is identified then police intelligence services can become involved,” he said.

“It may prove to be a false alarm or a real case of radicalization or fundamentalism."

Patrice Latro, Chief of the Paris police accepted "the phenomenon exists but is extremely marginal" given that Paris has 27, 000 officers..."

"Extremely marginal".

Right.

All that was needed to paralyze Paris a couple of months back was a handful of jihadi assholes. "17 cases between 2012 and 2015 of officers in Paris demonstrating behaviour or acts that concerned their superiors"?

Sounds like enough to me to be of major concern.

And as White Europe is further sliding down the demographic death spiral, and the composition of French Police is varying accordingly, and the proportion of followers of the prophet - piss, excrement and spit and menstruation blood be upon him - increases in the service...

... it can only get worse.


MFBB.

POLITICALLY CORRECT FASCISM IN SMALL BRITAIN: THE VLADISLAV ROGOZOV CASE.

A chilling example of a.) the fanaticism which has larger and larger swaths of muslims in Europe in its grip, b.) political correctness gone insane, and c.) the fascistoid nature of the multiculti enforcers. Via The Telegraph:

"A hospital consultant has been suspended after revealing that a Muslim surgeon walked out of an operation rather than remove her headscarf. Dr Vladislav Rogozov, 46, a consultant anaesthetist, was suspended by Sheffield's Royal Hallamshire Hospital after telling a website how he confronted the unnamed surgeon as they scrubbed up, according to The Sun. He said she refused to remove it, forcing the hospital to find a stand-in. She later left the hospital after an investigation backed Dr Rogozov for enforcing the strict dress code.

In its policy, the NHS trust says: “Headscarves worn for religious purposes are permitted in most areas, however they are excluded in areas such as theatre, where they could present a health and safety and cross-infection hazard.” The incident, in 2013, was not made public. However, Dr Rogozov, was suspended last month after revealing the episode – and other surgeons' more recent behaviour – on a Czech blog.
.
He said: “I came into the operating room, where I met the surgeon, a woman shrouded in a Muslim headscarf. I immediately stopped the operation of the hall and asked her to put down her scarf and replace it with the prescribed headgear.

“After a long discussion held with respect, decency and factual arguments, the surgeon refused and left the operating room. We managed to subsequently find another surgeon who performed the operation.

“After the end of the operating day other members of the surgical team came to me (in a low voice and with the door closed) to share their concerns about the threat to patient safety.”

He said other's shared his concerns but were reluctant to raise them for fear of being accused of racism or Islamaphobia. “If the medics in a developed country are afraid to draw attention to threats to patient safety because of accusations of racism, then it is an example of the absurdity of multiculturalism,” he wrote."

Dr Vladislav Rogozov works - or rather, worked - in a Sheffield hospital, and the incident in question took place in 2013 already. It was only in January of this year that he gave an interview to Czech blog Parliamenti Listy in which he recounted what happened, and so it finally became known in wider circles - to the detriment of the gallant doctor. Sheffield Teaching Hospital's NHS Trust suspended him.






As per usual, our brothers-in-arms at Gates of Vienna are on top of things, and thanks to GoV affiliates Xanthippa and Vlad Tepes we have the text of the interview:

"The Shocking Words of a Czech Physician Living in England: Female Muslim Physicians Are Refusing to Remove Their Headscarves Upon Entering the Operating Room, Muslim Physicians Leave Their Patients to Go Pray, the Reading of the Koran During Surgery."




Dr. Vladislav Rogozov


(transcript of interview with Dr. Rogozov as it appeared on Gates of Vienna).

"For more than 10 years, the Czech physician Vladislav Rogozov has been working at a teaching hospital in Sheffield, England. With this look at the current Islamization of Great Britain, he is attempting to bear witness to this serious danger to our homeland, in order that the Czech Republic might recognize this danger in time and not end up as tragically [as Great Britain]. He speaks of criminality growing out of the clash of different cultures, which was actively kept secret by the police, the politicians and the social workers. The victims of criminal acts have even been threatened in order to withdraw their testimony.


Tell us, how, from your point of view, what did the relatively recent Christmas celebrations look like in ‘good old England’? Have you noticed some difference to what it was like when, eleven years ago, you first came to Great Britain as a physician?


Christmas celebrations looked the same as all of England looks like — two parallel worlds and growing Islamization. In the countryside, where we live, there was a picturesque English Christmas, filled with carols and traditions. In many Muslim suburbs, there was no mention of the origin of Christmas. Its original meaning is intentionally being drowned in commercialization. Year after year, one can feel the growing influence of Islamization and political correctness.

For example, at a nearby school, the headmaster had, for the first time this year, banned the Christmas Tree. On BBC, I have, for the first time, noticed the greeting “Salaam Aleikum Merry Christmas”. And in one comedy show on BBC on Christmas Eve, they did not lay Baby Jesus in the manger, but Baby Mohammed. I guess it no longer surprises me.



What led you to start writing on your blog, the year before last, about the ongoing Islamisation of Great Britain, and to raise the warning, to prevent something similar from happening in the Czech Republic?



In 2005, when I received the offer to work at the Teaching Hospital in Sheffield, I did not hesitate for a minute. It was a professional and personal challenge. I had always admired England for all the good it had brought to humanity. A few days after arriving, on Thursday 7th July, I traveled from Sheffield to London to the General Medical Council. I did not make it to London that day. British Muslims had attacked innocent people, they killed dozens of them and injured hundreds. It was a total shock.

Yet it took me several more years before I would admit to myself that the process of Islamization is going on across the whole country, and that this process is no longer reversible.

In the year 2009 we had a reunion with other former students of the Medical School. When I told them that multiculturalism is not working in Britain, that it is just Islamization, none of them wanted to believe me. That is when I realized how easy it would be to underestimate this risk, if we do not pay attention to it in time. We are dealing with a huge problem, which concerns not just our safety, but the whole structure of our culture. However, the majority of Western politicians has not even dared to name it directly.



How would you describe it yourself?



Today, it is absolutely clear that in Europe there is a growing confrontation between two civilizations — the European democratic one and the Islamic theocratic one.

European culture is based on democracy, freedom, rule of law, individuals, critical thinking, the equality of people of differing opinions and genders. In contrast with this, Islamic culture is based on religious dogmatism, absolute veneration of religion, irrational obedience of the text of the Koran. From this then grows its intolerance of people with differing opinions or sexual orientation, or to the inequality [under the law] between men and women.

The values of these two systems are sufficiently different that they cannot exist at the same place and time without competing with each other. This clash can only have one of two results — either continuing Islamization or a long-term conflict. The probability that Islam might undergo some enlightened renaissance process is very low. For some countries, no good solution exists any longer.

I believe that the Czech Republic may yet avoid this. But not much time remains.



What do you see as the root causes of this?



The causes for the current movement of numerous Muslim populations into Europe are various. In many countries, the starting factor is post-colonial heritage and a myopic solution to the problem of the ageing of the European population due to low birth rates. The desire of closed Muslim communities to integrate into the majority culture is miniscule. To the contrary, their motivation for expansion and Islamization is immense. The existence of these communities has therefore brought great problems to all the Western countries that had, in good faith, undertaken this experiment.

Parallel worlds with parallel values were created, even including parallel legal systems. For example, in Britain, there exist dozens of Sharia tribunals.

The integration of Muslim communities had failed. It is not possible to integrate someone by force, against their will. The British government invests great resources and will into various integration programmes, without results.

For example, David Cameron announced that he will provide £20 million for a project to teach Muslim women to speak English, because a large majority of them do not even speak English. He immediately faced criticism from many Muslims that this is discriminatory and putting labels on people, and the British Muslim women don’t even have to speak English because they only go outside with their husbands, and so on.

Do we want to once be facing similar problems in the Czech Republic?

So, is Islam to blame for this state of things?

It is difficult to blame Islam for self-propagation; this is what it has always done and it has never attempted to hide it. The main problem is the weakness of our current European society and a crisis in values. If any living system, from a single cell to the whole of human community, gives up on its own defense and on maintaining its own integrity, it will most certainly perish. And it will free up living space for those more capable of survival.

Europeans have been lulled by long-lasting safety and prosperity. They have given up on the vigorous defense of its basic values; they consume experiences and give birth to too few children. It would be unnatural if such a weakness were not exploited by another, expansive culture to spread further. After all, freedom, democracy and the rule of law are not the products of safety, but its preconditions. If we do not defend these values, even with the use of force [if necessary], we will lose it all.



Has Europe not primarily caused these problems for herself?



A terrible mistake has been made with the series of unnecessary interventions in the Middle East. The result is our own weakening, the rise of Islamic terror, regional wars, chaos, unrest, the migrant crisis. Instead of exporting democracy — using force — into places where it has no chance to work, we should focus on vigorous defense and promotion of democratic values at home in Europe.

Another observation from here, in England, is the national self-flagellation. English people are raised to feel guilty for colonialism and from this flows this need for self-sacrifice in favour of peoples from the former colonies.

One of my friends, an English teacher, told me recently: “Thank you for opening my eyes. Until now, I had actually been ashamed of my English identity. Now I see that I have something to be proud of.” I think that many Germans have also approached this migrant wave while under the influence of the lingering shame for the war. However, we can do great harm with ill-considered acts of goodness.



You work at the cardiovascular clinic in a teaching hospital in Sheffield, you are teaching University students. How has it affected you personally, when the situation has led you to admit that you have started to fear Islam, that you have become an Islamophobe?



We meet almost daily with the manifestations and effects of Islamization, and every day its evolution truly greatly worries me. I fear the loss of our cultural identity, ideologically motivated violence and the danger of increasing fascism of a part of our European community. When I look at how England is changing, I become very sad. Many places now look like the streets of Pakistan. Yet much more important than appearances are the values that Islam brings with it.

I have deep respect for every human being, including every individual Muslim I have come into contact with, be it as a patient, a relative or a fellow physician. However, I do not have respect for the Islamic culture — it brings us unequal position of women before the law, intolerance to differences, racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, honour killings, female circumcision, Sharia, torturing of animals and other medieval “advances”.

Yet, an even worse danger is ideologically motivated violence. It is a proven fact many times over that Islam has the potential to inspire its followers to commit violence against innocent people. For that, it is sufficient to follow the daily news. Nobody can deny the fact that in the 21st century, the largest source of ideologically motivated violence comes from the Islamic environment.

Quite simply, until Islamic culture places human life above obedience to Allah, some Muslims will not stop killing in the name of Allah. And that is a sufficient reason to be afraid. However, Islamic culture cannot be forced into a renaissance of change; it has to arrive at it itself. Until that happens, we either have to defend ourselves against it or let ourselves be Islamized.

A no less disturbing effect of Islamization is the danger of radicalization of indigenous Europeans. Unless political representatives find the courage to name and solve this problem in a timely way, we may fear the rise of extremist and fascistic tendencies.




Less than a year ago you wrote that in multicultural Britain, there is an absolutely never-before-seen range of brutal rape and sexual slavery of children, and that the majority of the perpetrators are British Muslims of Asian descent, and their victims are white English children. This information has not surfaced here, and you have been accused in some discussions that you are making this up and that the officials did not cover this up. What would you say to that?




This is a specific type of crime which arises from the clash of differing cultures. Because it deals with criminality with a racial motivation, nobody dared to publish the truth for years. It was actively hidden by the police and social workers. Victims of criminal acts were even threatened, to make them recant their testimony. It is absolutely shocking, where Islamization in combination with political correctness leads. But I have described that in my post “About the Rape of Children…”

If you are asking me about personally assigning guilt, I do not solve this. Idiots exist everywhere; they are cowardly and hide behind anonymity. Everything I have written about this problem is supported by evidence published by British institutions and thus easily provable. The victims’ testimonies are available for viewing on-line on BBC iPlayer. I personally know the mother of one of the victims.



What are the loudest [most ostentatious] personal experiences you or those closest to you have had with the impact of Islamization on your lives?




Unfortunately, those experiences could fill a whole book. I have written about some of these already on my blog. So, randomly…

Islamization directly affects many aspects of life, from shopping to picking schools. For example, when we were picking a school for our growing daughter, we were quite surprised. Not by the number of Muslim children in the classrooms, but with the attitude of the personnel. Everywhere, they welcomed us as foreigners, that they are proud of their institution, and proud of their multicultural approach. Then, when we toured the classrooms, every single notice-board was dedicated to the teachings of Islam.

We decided to sell our house in the city and to move to the countryside. There we finally found a traditional English school and community — exactly what we had wanted our daughter to still experience. This is a general trend: because of growing Islamization, many people are moving from the cities into the outlying regions.

We also had to solve a number of problems in the hospital — physicians and medics refuse to remove their headscarves upon entering the operating room, Muslim physicians leave their patients in order to go pray, demands for breaks for prayers, and so on. Just last week, our operating room nurses were complaining that one Muslim anaethesiologist, in the middle of a surgery, started reading out loud from the Koran and urged the rest of the personnel to also read from it. And I have to note that here, in the teaching hospital, this is much less pronounced than in a number of smaller hospitals. There, the situation is much worse.




And do fears of terrorism manifest themselves somehow?




The fear of Islamic terrorism is unpleasant and ever-present. Even MI5 admits that it is only a question of time before something happens. I remember how my friend, also a Czech doctor, phoned me in a panic when there was that terrorist attack at Glasgow airport. One of his colleagues, a Muslim physician at his hospital, was one of the perpetrators.

Publicly, nobody speaks about these problems openly: it is discussed only among good friends, behind closed doors. Criticizing Islam can easily be classified as fanning religious intolerance, and that is a criminal act in Britain. The situation is similar to what it had once been with any criticism of communism [behind the Iron Curtain]. Some negative manifestations were publically named, but they could not be connected to the cause. Open discussion existed only in private; public critics were punished.




How do the local media react, face to face, to this growing Islamization of Great Britain, whether it be the publically funded BBC or private outlets? From your previous answer, one may presume that instead of open transfer of information, they prefer political correctness, just as it is here as well as in most of the countries of the European Union.




No politician ever asked their electorate if they wanted the Islamization of their countries. When the majority culture, horrified, started to wake up, it was too late. Politicians cannot now ignore millions of their Muslim citizens, they have the same rights as non-Muslims. And they are voters. That is why it was necessary to create political correctness, as a tool to suppress criticism and cause the gradual erosion of the freedom of speech.

In the name of maintaining non-violent coexistence of different cultures, the politicians themselves have no choice, whether they like it or not, about aiding the peaceful Islamization of society.

The same goes for the media. On BBC, you can watch original shows about Muslims, or, perhaps, about how great it is to convert to Islam. The media carry information about current events — even about rapes, honour killings, female circumcision, terrorism — but nobody dares to link it with Islamic culture and its value system. They call it different things — the influence of a perverse ideology, extremism, radicalization — yet nobody dares to criticize Muslims. Even David Cameron says that these are “not Muslims, but monsters” — who have twisted and misused Islam. They never explain just how.

More and more, British Muslims are affecting the view of Britain on the international scene. The country that gave humanity democracy and the Beatles has thus become renown for its export of jihadists, who cut the heads off of living people.

Monday’s discussion in Parliament was symptomatic of this. The MPs had to debate barring Donald Trump from entering Britain — the subject of a petition signed by hundreds of thousands of British Muslims. One of my English colleagues told me yesterday just how ashamed he is of British image in the world. And it will get worse. As the Muslim community grows, it will promote its needs more vigorously.

That huge migration wave which rolled into Europe last year, according to the views of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, appears to be unstoppable. After the New Year’s attacks by hundreds of migrants on women and girls in Cologne-on-Rhine and also other and not just German cities, might the approach of the political elites [to the migrants] change? What reactions to these events have you noted in Great Britain?

German politics regarding the migration wave was perceived here with criticism. One could often hear the opinions that it is one-sided politics which endangers the stability of Europe. Information about the Cologne attacks was carried by all the major outlets, including airing the victims’ statements.

However, the news reporting was, of course, politically correct. I did not notice a single report where one of the commentators would draw an unequivocal link between the attacks and Muslim immigration. Nobody bothered to note that there might, perhaps, be some similarity to the thousands of attacks by Muslim men against English women.




If you have written off the future of Great Britain in light of the basic cultural and demographic change to the society and their vanishing identity, how do you see the chances of the continental countries of the European Union — primarily Germany and France, but, of course, also of the Czech Republic?




We do not experience the happenings in France as directly as we do those in England, even though we do go over to visit my sister-in-law and my niece is studying in high school there. However, I do think that France is about on par with England when it comes to Islamization. There is no good solution — either continuing Islamization or prolonged conflict.

What the politicians did in Germany — that is suicidal, dangerous and careless, both with respect to their own citizens and to surrounding countries. Who, in God’s name, have they taken counsel with regarding this decision? We will feel the results for a long time. And with the coming spring, the problem will return with a renewed intensity.

The European Union has failed. The Schengen area is crumbling; now it functions in reverse — its outer borders are porous, yet the internal borders between the States are being closed. There are very few reasons to think that the European Union will be able to deal as a united entity or defend itself as a whole. Protecting the integrity and security would appear to be more and more dependent on individual states.

Therefore the Czech Republic should not act as an afterthought to events, but should be prepared to take control of its borders at any time. In this context, the Visegrad area [Hungary, Slovakia, Poland and the Czech Republic] would appear to grow in importance. I think that the preservation of cultural identity and the prevention of Islamization lies in the close cooperation between these countries. It is quite possible that the tables will turn and that the bastion of democracy on the continent may, in the future, lie in Central Europe. Perhaps once the former inhabitants of Western countries will try to emigrate to us [Central Europe] just as once we had lined up to emigrate from there to escape totalitarian regimes. We tried out communism for them; they have tried out Islamization for us. We will be even. We must be ready to help them.




How can the citizens of the Czech Republic help ensure that their country will not follow in the footsteps of the Islamized Great Britain, and how should they face the accusations of xenophobia, Islamophobia and racism, to which they are subjected the moment they dare voice their disagreement with accepting migrants?




The only non-violent way to defend against Islamization is to not permit it to even start. To the West of us, we have plenty of case studies in how large Muslim migration changes society, how the formation of isolated ghettos came about along with a parallel value system. Therefore, preventing mass Muslim immigration and the creation of closed communities is the only protection from Islamization.

Of course, it makes no sense to hold a primary war against Islam. The primary thing should be the protection of our own values and way of life. Of course, not at the cost of closing ourselves to the world — that would be suicide. It is necessary to remain open and friendly to newcomers — to be attractive for those who want to accept our culture and its values, and wholly unaccepting of those who do not wish to respect this. Thus, the answer is a strong democracy, an open society that knows its values and knows how to use any means to protect them against those who either do not respect it or hate it.

That also goes regarding the freedom of speech. Political correctness is censorship, a barrier to freedom of expression, we should wholly reject it. If we do not call problems by their real names, we cannot solve them.



So, you do not see the worst of human qualities behind rejecting the migrants, as some ‘do-gooders’ would have us think?




Everyone has the right to voice their disagreement with accepting the migrants. The first concern of individuals must be their family, then surrounding area and then their country. If there exists strong proofs regarding negative impacts if immigration on safety, it is absolutely their place to worry about the effects of unchecked immigration. Anything else would be hazardous. There is no other way nature can work. If anyone calls well-supported fears xenophobia, we are dealing with implementing the principles of Political Correctness. Politeness, freedom, courage and truth — these are effective tools to fight Political Correctness.

Of course, I feel sorry for all those suffering from war. It is our moral duty to help those who need help, that is one of our core values. The more we help, the better the world around us will be and even we ourselves. Helping helps cultivate individuals and societies.

On the other hand, it is clear that we cannot help all those who need help. We can only help within the frame of our abilities and from our own free will. Helping at the cost of our own safety and integrity is suicide. Then, we will not be able to help anyone.

Of course, it also holds that helping does not mean moving everyone into your own home. It is possible to help the needy in many different ways.




If you follow the happenings on the Czech domestic scene, how would you comment the opinions of the President, Milos Zeman, with respect to the other side as represented by the Prime Minister, Bohuslav Sobotka, the defeated candidates of direct presidential election Karel Schwarzenberg and Jiri Dienstbiere, or the leader of the opposition, Miroslav Kalousek, on the migration wave to Europe? Does the President have the right to say that this is our country?




Of course, we follow domestic developments. Now, I do not want to address individual statements, there are so many of them and they are evolving so fast. However, I am afraid that the majority of our politicians still do not admit just how pivotal these times are in which we find ourselves. The current evolution of events will forever affect the shape of our country.

The politicians must defend the interests and safety of their own citizens; that is why they were elected and why we pay them. They must protect the country against dangers and risks, which also include uncontrolled immigration. Therefore, the [Czech] Republic must be ready to protect its borders. If it comes to the growth of the numerous Muslim community, Islamization will begin and there will be no way back. Such a basic decision regarding the mass immigration of an incompatible culture ought to remain under the overarching control of each member country. And they [the decisions] ought not be made by politicians elected for just a few years — this should be decided upon by citizens, in a referendum.

Yet there is something even more important here. The public and the politicians are facing a basic task — to guide the ship of democracy between the cliffs of Islamization on the one hand and fascism on the other. The longer politicians delay in naming things by their real names, the closer to these cliffs we will come. It is obvious that navigating between them will take effort and sacrifices. Let’s hope these will be just material sacrifices.

In order for people to be willing to give up parts of their comfort for the benefit of immaterial values and for future prosperity, they need motivation in the shape of political vision. We do not need politicians who are afraid or who are scaremongers. We need politicians who will inspire. We don’t need to say what kind of country we do not want, but rather what kind of a country we do want to live in — not showing people what to fight against but what to fight for. We need politicians who will give people a vision — “shared values, which are worth defending”.

And that even at the cost of more expensive gas and lowered pensions. If our culture is to survive, we have to define our values and protect them from all ideologies, which either do not respect or hate them. Already we have handed our country over without a fight twice — first to fascism, then to communism. Will we succeed in protecting it against Islam? I still believe that yes, we will."

We will - only if we beat the cancer in our midst first. Leftism.

The traitors who suspended Dr Rogozov should be made aware that when the shooting starts, the punishment for collaboration will be severe.



MFBB.

ACHTUNG!!! WATCH OUT FOR POTENTIALLY CATASTROPHIC MERKEL/TURKEY DEAL.

Via PI-News:

"Will Merkel tomorrow, on March 7, 2016, during the so-called EU-Turkey summit, sell 500 million Europeans to Turkey? With her pointless plan, "saddling" Turkey with the task to stem the migrant flow for which muslims are responsible themselves, the German Chancellor is completely rendering herself subordinate to Sultan Erdogan. Who is this person, who is prepared to turn a blind eye to the terrible human rights abuses in Turkey?"

It is astounding - no, actually it is not - that our MSM pay barely attention to this potentially CATASTROPHIC summit. Merkel will go there with a proposal doctored by the German EU "Kommissar" Günther Oettinger, a proposal which boils down to EU taxpayers coughing up 7 billion EUR yearly in exchange for Turkey stopping the flow of "refugees" AND allowing all Turks to enter the EU without visas!

The completely faulty rationale behind this crock of a plan, its ramifications for Europe, the shady mechanisms behind it, the scandalous smoke curtains our media are pulling up lest the man in the street realizes how he's being thrown for the wolves is astounding.

First off, that the Middle East, and Iraq and Syria in particular, is in turmoil, resulting in war and refugees, is a crisis of islam's own making, since that belief system is utterly incapable of offering its followers a peaceful, just and prosperous society. Islam means hate and backwardness, and nothing good can come out of it.

Secondly, Turkey has, under the West's nose, played a double game. On the one hand, it allows ISIS oil trafficking, thereby ensuring it a steady income. On the other hand, until now it has done NOTHING to stop the flow of "refugees" to Europe, quite the contrary: by offering millions of muslims fleeing a chaos of their own making a highway to the EU, Turkey is de facto fulfilling a pivotal role in ISIS' plan to destabilize Europe.

And what is Europe's reaction? A complete failure to seal off its borders and offering Turkey money to stop the flow while it's an open secret they have no intention to do it.

To add insult to injury, the gullible EU "elites" are now even willing to step up the yearly EU stipends to 7 billion EUR, money which will be used, dixit Erdogan, to "build a city in northern Syria to contain the refugees"!

If Merkel and Co. are pushing this plan through, they quite frankly deserve to be shot. For this "Refugee City" for which the EU taxpayers will pay handily, will only be an excuse for Turkey to reclaim territory lost post World War I.

In short, if Oettinger's plan is implemented, this is what will happen:


* The EU will pay 7 billion EUR of European citizens' taxpayer money to Turkey.
* Erdogan, who plays Merkel and the EU like a violin, will not make good on his part of the "deal", i.e. stop the "refugee" flow. He got three billion EUR last autumn, and the tidal wave has only increased. By now Erdogan has given such ample proof of his neo-Ottoman imperalism and religious zeal that if you believe he will stop the flow, I have a bridge across the Bosphorus to sell you.
* What he WILL do with the money is use 0.00000001 per cent of it to erect some tents in northern Syria and use the rest to consolidate his country's claims on lands over which his forebears ruled for centuries.
* to top it all off, as part of the deal, 80 million Turks will be free to enter the EU without visas, thereby hastening Europe's islamization even more.


Merkel/Oettinger's plan thus means that Europeans will pay truckloads of money for getting screwed three times!!!


Not surprisingly, you will find NOTHING of this crucial EU/Turkey "summit" and it's potentially horrific consequences (for EU citizens) in leftist rag "De Standaard" - except that indeed they helpfully mention in passing that "Erdogan wants to build a Refugee City in Syria"!!!!! Oh what a nice man!

TURKISH PRESIDENT WANTS TO BUILD REFUGEE CITY IN SYRIA.

"Recep Tayyip Erdogan launched a proposal to build in Syria's north a city to shelter a part of the people fleeing the war's violence. "What is the solution? We build a city in the north of Syria [...] to offer accommodations again to refugees", Erdogan said on Friday, according to Turkish state press bureau Anadolu. "This city can become a reality with support of the international community at Turkey's border." Erdogan says that regarding this matter, he already had talks with his American counterpart Barack Obama, and that a location has even been determined, but that the project isn't ready yet. How much time would be needed, Erdogan didn't say."

This is not even bad journalism anymore, it's nonsense, lies, deceit and incompetence all mixed together.


However, De Standaard does offer more insight when it comes to Trump! DS editors were eager to quote German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel, who said last week that "TRUMP IS A DANGER FOR PEACE AND PROGRESS".

"Donald Trump does not differ from European rightwing populists like Marine Le Pen or Geert Wilders, opines German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel. "They all promise a return to a fairy world".

This is actually amazing. A-MA-ZING. Sigmar Gabriel, Angela Merkel, Guy Verhofstadt, Martin Schulz, Claude Juncker, all of them usual suspects would actually like to let Erdogan's Turkey JOIN the EU. Even if Erdogan is a barely disguised - no, make that openly - islamist, and has facilitated in no small part ISIS's plans to flood Europe with "refugees" to destabilize it. That this will have profound and devastating consequences has been apparent - especially in Germany!!! - since last autumn.

Now here is an American presidential candidate who claims that he will effectively PROTECT HIS COUNTRY'S BORDERS - something the EU has majestically failed to do thus far.

And he is labeled a "DANGER FOR PEACE AND PROGRESS"!!!

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is selling ISIS oil and giving European jihadists a free ride to the calpihate, and who last week RAIDED TURKISH NEWSPAPER ZAMAN, a rare beacon of opposition to Erdogan's authoritarian regime, only to fill Zaman's offices with his cronies, that Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose heels Merkel will lick tomorrow...

... he is NOT deemed a "DANGER FOR PEACE AND PROGRESS".


If you still have to stomach for it, read Katie Hopkins' take on the insanity that's rampant among Europe's "elites".

I can't take it anymore.


MFBB.

SATURDAY NIGHT LENNY KRAVITZ, NEW ORDER.

Lenny Kravitz with I'll be waiting.




From the 2008 album It is time for a Love Revolution.



New Order with Regret.




Lead single from their 1993 album Republic.



To our Ukrainian friends in particular, Na dobranič!



MFBB.

CULTURAL ENRICHMENT IN DENMARK: MEET ABU BILAL ISMAIL OF THE GRIMHOJ MOSQUE IN AARHUS.

Thanks to Gates of Vienna the world - or at least the part that pays attention - now knows Imam Abu Bilal Ismail of the Grimhøj Mosque in Aarhus, Denmark. GoV posted two hidden-camera videos of this asshole, videos which, in a normal country, should have said imam expelled pronto.

In the first one, imam Abu Bilal Ismail gives advice to muslim parents regarding the beating children for the sake of their education and to hammer home the precepts of sharia.

PEGIDA DK did the translation, and the indefatigable Vlad Tepes the subtitling:




In the second video featuring imam Abu Bilal Ismail, and aired on TV2, he calls for the killing of apostates, the stoning of adulterers, and the whipping of divorced women. Mr Ismail can thank Allah on his bare knees that he is a darling of our leftist moral betters, or he wouldn't get away with it so easily.

Again, PEGIDA DK provided the translation and Vlad Tepes the subtitling:




Here is the transcript as provided by Gates of Vienna:

00:00 Women, it is only allowed to spill Muslim blood for three reasons.
00:03 The first reason: for fornication.
00:06 If a married or divorced women fornicates, and she is not a virgin —
00:09 and commits adultery, she must be stoned to death.
00:14 The second reason: An eye for an eye.
00:18 If you kill a Muslim, you must yourself be killed.
00:22 The third reason: One who turns away from religion (Islam) must be killed.
00:26 If you deny (Islam), or don’t believe in the fast, the judgment must be that you are an infidel.
00:30 If you are stubborn and do not want to fast, you must be killed.
00:36 But that is not done in Denmark.
00:40 If an adulterer, be it a man or a women who whores —
00:44 then their blood is halal, and they must be killed by stoning.
00:48 If she is married, she will be stoned (to death).
00:52 If she is a virgin, the punishment is whipping.
00:56 And a divorced women who commits an act of whoring? Is the punishment whipping or execution?
01:03 Whipping, whipping. — Whipping. Is that right?
01:06 No, even if she is not married, the punishment is death.
01:11 Only a virgin who commits an act of whoring, and who has never been married —
01:16 will be punished with a whipping.

Oh the many joys and blessings of multiculturalism!



MFBB.

HANNOVER, GERMANY: 15-YEAR OLD MOROCCAN GIRL STABS, GRAVELY WOUNDS POLICE OFFICER WITH KITCHEN KNIFE.

Via PI News, 3 March 2016:

"Already last Friday Hannover Police issued a communiqué that one of its employees, during a passport check at the main railway station, had been stabbed in the neck with a kitchen knife, and gravely wounded, by a 15-year old Moroccan girl carrying a German passport (small photo). The hijab-clad muslim girl had captured the officers' attention because of her "rigid stare". The girl was arrested on charges of attempted murder. After a thorough investigation information was disclosed showing that the young jihadi had dwelled along the Turkish-Syrian border, established contacts with IS there, and planned to later on cross into Syria to join the jihad. A Hannover Police officer said that she had stabbed her victim "with ice cold demeanor" and that after the stabbing she had only shown concern about whether her headscarf needed adjusting...."

"Islam is a part of Germany", eh, Angela?


MFBB.

SUNDAY NIGHT ART SNACK: CAMILLE PISSARRO (1830-1903).

Camille Pissarro (10 July 1830 – 13 November 1903) was a Danish-French Impressionist and Neo-Impressionist. Danish-French because he was born on Saint-Thomas, in 1830 still a part of the Danish West Indies (now the Virgin Islands). Pissarro, who was indebted to great forerunners like Jean-Baptiste Camille Corot and Gustave Courbet, would himself become something of a father figure and mentor to a host of younger colleagues, including Georges Seurat, Paul Signac, Paul Cézanne, Paul Gauguin and Vincent van Gogh.



Rue de l'Epicerie, Rouen.


Entrée du village de Voisins.


MFBB.

SATURDAY NIGHT TAME IMPALA, ROBERT PALMER.

Tame Impala with Let it Happen. From the 2015 album Currents.




Aussie psychedelic rockband from Perth, where it formed in 2007. Frontman Kevin Parker writes, performs and produces his own music.



Robert Palmer with Some guys have all the luck.




Often covered song by Jeff Fortgang. The Palmer version is on his 1982 album Maybe it's live. Which also happens to be the album by which I noticed the gentleman rocker. Although the cover with that weird insect-like alien on it probably had as much to do with it as the music.


Goede nacht.


MFBB.

RECOMMENDED READS: STEPHEN BROWN'S "THE REFUGEE HOSTEL: GERMANY'S ISLAMIST HELL"

Via FrontPage Magazine, February 23, 2016: a compelling look at the incubation centers for islamic radicalization that have become Germany's asylum shelters:

"They fled religious hatred, rape and violence in their homelands for the “safe” haven of Germany -- only to encounter the same, brutal conditions in their new accommodations: the refugee hostel.

Violence in refugee centers became a national topic in Germany last October, only weeks after Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel invited into Europe one million, mainly Muslim, refugees. But exposure of this disgraceful situation appears to have had little effect, as German newspapers are reporting this month that conditions remain unchanged.

In fact, life in German refugee hostels has now become so unbearable thatreligious minorities, women traveling alone or with children, and homosexuals are fleeing their accommodations. For them, according to one paper, the word "hostel" has become synonymous with ‘"defenselessness".

The constant harassment and mistreatment at the hands of Muslim male refugees is not only becoming intolerable and dangerous, but, for some, life-threatening.

“Torn bibles and insults, ripped off crosses and even blows to the face, the complaints about violence in the refugee centers do not let up,” the German newspaper, Die Welt, stated recently.

According to Rainer Wendt, chairman of the German Police Union, outbreaks of violence in German refugee centers were occurring before last August. In the first six months of 2015, police were called out 1,288 times to refugee asylums and registered 499 crimes. One problem is definitely the overcrowding, Wendt said, but there are also “knallharte” (very brutal) criminal structures among the refugees.

Most violent incidents occur between Muslims themselves. They form groups, Wendt says, according to “ethnicity, religion or clan structure and go at one another with knives and self-made weapons.” And the fights, which can involve dozens on each side, concern “power struggles” and are “above all, religious or politically motivated.” Numerous violent disputes have ended in death.

“Here the Sunnis fight the Shiites, there are Salafists of different brands …women are forced to wear the veil. Men are forced to pray. Islamists want to install their values and order there,” said Wendt.

But among the mistreated minority groups, one is especially targeted for abuse: Muslim converts to Christianity. Many are from Iran and Afghanistan where Christians are a persecuted minority and Islamic law demands that they be put to death for leaving the faith.

One human rights organization official says the chances of a Muslim convert to Christianity, unwilling to hide his faith, being subjected to violence or mobbing in a refugee center is “nearly 100 percent.” And the situation is only going to get worse.

“Among those arriving now, a not insignificant portion is at least on the level of the Muslim Brotherhood in its religious intensity,” he said.

Pastor Gottfried Martens, who counts six hundred Christian converts from Islam in his Berlin parish, agrees. Martens, who baptized many of them himself, said, it is “above all Christian converts from Islam who have to suffer as a minority” in the hostels. Christians are not allowed to prepare their meals in the kitchens and “whoever does not pray five times a day in the direction of Mecca is mobbed.”

“Almost all of them have huge problems in their hostels,” said Martens. “Strictly believing Muslims there convey the view: Where we are, sharia rules, our law rules.”

Which causes one to wonder: What does this situation bode for Germany’s future once these “refugees” are let loose in society?

One Christian refugee from Iran is probably also asking himself this same question. In an anonymous interview with Die Welt, he said he would never have thought he would face religious persecution in Germany like that in Iran. There, he had belonged to an underground church and fled after the secret police had arrested his brother for attending one too. After crossing Turkey on foot, he made it to Germany where he thought he could finally live out a Christian life without fear.

But he was wrong. Placed in a hostel with mostly strictly believing Sunni Syrians, the young Iranian says he cannot openly profess his faith or “then I will be threatened.”

“During Ramadan, they wake me up before dawn and say I should eat before the sun comes up,” he told Die Welt. “When I decline, they say I’m an “infidel." They spit at me. They treat me like an animal and threaten to kill me.”

The one other group suffering equal, and possibly worse, abuse in German refugee asylums is women traveling alone. Overall, women make up 25 percent of the migrant population. And they, as well as children, are particularly vulnerable to sexual violence. The federal official responsible for this area in refugee asylums nation-wide says reports of such violence reach him daily from around Germany.

As regards the number of such incidents, no one knows for sure. But according to the Psychosocial Center for Refugees, “there are many.” In a center in Giessen, there were 15 reported cases of sexual abuse of women in one month, leading police to investigate cases of rape and forced prostitution. The situation there is described as “a second- or third-world situation…like a UN refugee camp in Africa.”

"Islam is a part of Germany", eh, Angela?



MFBB.

BALTIC AIR POLICING FROM AMARI, ESTONIA.

Four Belgian F-16s currently operate from Ämari Air Base in Estonia, as part of NATO's Enhanced Air Policing Mission (EAPM).




Ämari Air Base is located in Harjumaa, a northwestern county in Estonia, at the Gulf of Finland. The base is located 7 kilometers south of Lake Klooga. During the Cold War, the Soviet Air Force operated from Ämari with 170th and 321st Naval Shturmovik Aviation Regiments, which were equipped with Su-24 Fencers (the same type is currently being used for bombing ISIS). The Estonian Government proposed NATO to use the base to conduct its Baltic Air Policing patrols. Ämari was assessed for that purpose by USAF's 48th Fighter Wing in April 2014. The facility was found suitable for the task, and before long four Danish F-16's started their patrols from there. Since then, there have been regular shifts of NATO four-plane detachments. The base even saw the arrival of F-22 Raptors last autumn.


Here's a rather flashy video made by NATO of our F-16's operating from Ämari:




And while our old F-16's are for the umpteenth time being deployed overseas, the political debate in Belgium still has not given any indication with regards to the Fighting Falcon's successor. If it were up to the military, the F-35 would be it. Despite the F-35's lengthy and costly development period and the difficulties still plaguing the programme, it still remains the obvious candidate for the F-16 replacement. Belgium's defense industry thinks so too - in September 2015 three leading defense companies, Sonaca, SABCA, and Ilias Solutions signed a protocol accord with Lockheed Martin.


MFBB.

DENMARK'S JEPPE JUHL ON THE DISASTER THAT IS SWEDEN.

Watch the following video by Jeppe Juhl, a Danish journalist and TV personality:




Løkke is Lars Løkke Rasmussen, the center-right Danish PM who took over from lefty Helle Thorning-Schmidt last year. Pind is Søren Pind, the Danish Minister for Justice and for Refugees and Immigrants. Although nominally center-right (also of the right of center Venstre party), he should be scrutinized at all times since having shown in the past decidely leftist streaks. And Støjberg is Inger Støjberg, who to the best of my knowledge is Minister of Integration. She is to be watched closely too.

When a country needs two minister for stuff related to integrate newcomers the rot has advanced very far.

Maybe Denmark can spare itself the worst of Sweden's calamities. But emphasis on affiliation is completely insufficient.

MORE AND MORE Euro politicians should follow the Trump line: BLOCK MUSLIM IMMIGRATION COMPLETELY.

Which, by the way, is something yours truly advocated...

.... twelve years ago.



Hat tip our brothers-in-arms at Gates of Vienna. Tania Groth did the translation, and Vlad Tepes the subtitling.


MFBB.

CULTURAL ENRICHMENT IN BELGIUM IN FULL SWING.

Every day now brings fresh evidence of the sheer and utter insanity of allowing tens of thousands muslim "refugees" in. This is a small selection of last week's heartwarming stories:


1.) Via HLN Online, 19 February 2016. AFGHAN "REFUGEE" RAPES YOUNG WOMAN IN CELLAR ASYLYM CENTER.

"A 16 year old Afghan asylum seeker is suspected of having raped an employee in a refugee shelter in Menen, VTM News reports. This is confirmed by the Ghent branch of Prosecution in the province of East Flanders. The facts occurred wednesday in a Red Cross facility in Menen. The victim is working for a caterer delivering supplies to the asylum center. When the woman was in the cellar handling supplies, she was raped by the teenage boy, reports VTM News. Before, the boy would already have hurled verbal insults to the woman..."

2.) ELEVEN ASYLUM SEEKERS "REMOVED" AFTER BRAWL OVER HEADSCARF: "THEY HAVE TO ADAPT TO OUR RULES."

"The eleven persons taken into custody Friday afternoon after a fight in which a hundred individuals were involved in the Leopoldsburg asylum center have been "removed". This is confirmed by An Luyten, spokeswoman for the Red Cross. "The four who were a part of the hard core have been transferred to a closed refugee shelter. The seven others have been individually placed elsewhere in other asylum centers in Flanders", says An Luyten."

So first police and staff had to intervene in the asylum center in Leopoldsburg to calm things down. Then four hotheads had to be transported and placed in a closed "refugee" center elsewhere to limit future damage. And then the seven others had to be placed somewhere else also, INDIVIDUALLY, which means that at least seven times police vehicles had to be deployed to transport them to seven separate refugee centers. And who is paying for all this nonsense??? Why, me, us, the stupid Belgian taxpayers!

As for the quote "They have to adapt to our rules", no, it's not coming directly from the eleven culture enrichers, though you can be sure that's on their mind. It's actually from State Secretary for Asylum and Migration Theo Francken (N-VA), a full-blooded idiot, strong on words, weak in deeds.



3.) MINORS FIGHTING EACH OTHER IN ASYLUM CENTER ZWIJNDRECHT.

"In Zwijndrecht, near Antwerp, a sixteen year old boy was slightly wounded in a fight between several minors in an asylum center. This is confirmed by the Zwijndrecht Police Department."

So this turd is "slightly wounded". Ergo, he's being treated in some hospital and receiving excellent care...

... paid for by you know who.




It is all so utterly depressing.



MFBB.

SATURDAY NIGHT SEMISONIC, NIRVANA.

Semisonic with Closing Time. From the 1998 album Feeling Strangely Fine.




Alternative rock band from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Formed in 95, barely lasted six years.



Nirvana with The Man Who Sold the World. It's on their 1994 MTV Unplugged in New York album.




Bowie cover, but I suppose you know that.



Goede nacht.



MFBB.

INSANE: ONE THIRD OF MEALS FOR AUSSIE TROOPS TO BE HALAL CERTIFIED, DESPITE ONLY 100 MUSLIMS SERVING OUT OF 60,000 IN ADF.

Via MailOnline, 17 February 2016. Read and weep:

"The decision to make a third of meals for Australian troops halal-certified has angered military members, veterans and politicians, with less than 100 Muslims serving in the Australian Defence Force (ADF).

Deputy Chief of Army Major General Rick Burr has approved demands that four of 12 combat menu options be halal-certified. This comes after changes to ensure variety in ration packs, with dietary requirements such as vegetarian, kosher, and halal being accommodated for 'to meet ADF's commitment to providing an inclusive working ­environment,' the Daily Telegraph has reported.

However, Lieutenant General Angus J Campbell, Chief of the Australian Army, told Daily Mail Australia: 'The proportion of combat rations specifically manufactured to meet religious considerations will vary subject to the ADF’s demography and our operating environment. The suggestion that one third has to be halal certified is incorrect.'

However, the sweeping changes have enraged some of ADF's 60,000 full-time and reserve servicemen and women who query how many taxpayer dollars halal certifiers will receive from the new arrangement.

According to the Telegraph, a federal government inquiry is investigating unregulated halal certifiers. Senator Cory Bernardi, a member of the senate inquiry, criticised the changes by saying 'decisions like this suggest it has become more an instrument of supporting minority interests rather than being focused on the national interest'. Former Army intelligence officer and Australian Liberty Alliance Senate candidate for Queensland, Bernie Gaynor, said Australia deserves 'better'."

Those following CDRSalamander are well acquainted with the Diversity Industry's disgusting interference in all matters military. Each Thursday brings another revelation of an umpteenth victory for the PC crowd in enforcing political correctness on the Armed Forces at the cost of combat effectiveness and safety for the troops, and those they are supposed to protect.

It now appears however that the rot has also affected the Australian Defense Forces.

At the end of 2015 the Australian government put the official number of "Australians" having joined IS at around 110.

That number is almost certainly too low. A New York based think tank consisting of international terror experts put the number as high as 255.

If that is true, then Australian muslims fighting for IS would outnumber Australian muslims serving in the ADF by a factor of 2.5...

... and yet Major General Rick Burr found it necessary to approve "demands" - presumably by the same kind of PC bullies and Diversity Nazis destroying the US Armed Forces from within - to halal-certify A FULL THIRD OF COMBAT MENU OPTIONS.

I don't fucking care if Major General Burr is a distinguished graduate of the United States Marine Corps, has a Distinguished Service Cross, or received the Bronze Star or the US's Legion of Merit (twice, reportedly). If what the Daily Mail writes is true...

... Burr is UNFIT FOR COMMAND.

And should be sacked.



MFBB.

AMAZING FOOTAGE HIDDEN FOR YEARS BY MSM: MUSLIM HEAD OF ORCHESTRA LECTURES DUTCH QUEEN ON 'BEAUTY OF ISLAM', ORCHESTRA CALLS IT QUITS.

Some amazing footage from The Netherlands has emerged.

Sometime in 2011, the Dutch National Orchestra was preparing to play a Gustav Mahler work before Queen Beatrix [the reigning queen is Maxima, to be sure - MFBB].

The orchestra chief, a muslim, suddenly decided to enlighten the Queen and entourage on islam's "beauty", and extol its virtues.

Two things happened next.

First, the Orchestra members quit the stage. GOOD. Even, VERY GOOD.

Second, the whole affair was carefully hidden by the MSM. BAD. Even, VERY BAD.

Watch the whole thing:




Some fleshing out tomorrow, hopefully.

Hat tip my uncle R.



MFBB.

RECOMMENDED VIDEOS: JEPPE JUHL ON DENMARK'S "LUEGENPRESSE".

Via our incomparable friends at Gates of Vienna, an interesting video of a Danish alternative website. The speaker is Jeppe Juhl, and he lambasts the scandalously biased news coverage of the traditional media outlets:




Liberty DK did the translation, and Vlad Tepes the subtitling.

The fight goes on. If you cherish liberty, link to this video and others like it far and wide, no matter where you live.



MFBB.

RECOMMENDED READS: JOHN HAWKINS' "CAPITALISM IS FREEDOM; SOCIALISM IS SLAVERY".

Powerful article by John Hawkins over at American Thinker:

"The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither. The society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both." -- Milton Friedman

“If there is ever a fascist takeover in America, it will come not in the form of storm troopers kicking down doors but with lawyers and social workers saying, ‘I'm from the government and I'm here to help.’” – Jonah Goldberg

In a time where consumers have almost unlimited choices of music, movies, websites and every product you can imagine in the supermarket, socialism is an outdated economic system that no longer fits with the world we live in. Socialism requires the intervention and control of the marketplace by an overwhelmingly powerful centralized government. It penalizes high achievers, rewards laziness and stifles choice.

Socialism is a government regulation that stops you from creating a successful business. It’s the Bureau of Land Management or the EPA making arbitrary decisions about what you can do with your own land. It’s the IRS taking the money you busted your butt to earn and giving it to people who didn’t work as hard as you did.

Almost every socialist policy requires taking resources from someone who’s earned them and giving them to someone who hasn’t. Even programs that are supposed to be self-funding rarely are because the juice is never quite worth the squeeze. The real reason we’re so deeply in debt is because if the middle class was forced to choose between paying for what our government is spending or dramatically cutting back, our government would already be much smaller than it is – and no wonder.

What does our government do well anymore? Do you trust the IRS? FEMA? Are our borders secure? How does the customer service of the post office or DMV compare to, let’s say Apple or Amazon? Who wants to live in government housing? Who wants a minimum wage job? Who wants to answer to bureaucrats, jump through their hoops and do as he’s told by people who see him as a nameless, faceless slob dependent upon them for his livelihood?

This is what socialism offers.

Socialism will take something from someone else who earned it and give it to you and in return, you will do what socialists want you to do. If you’re irresponsible, lazy, have a habit of making poor decisions or just need a master, this can seem like a good deal. You can work a menial job and get paid more than you’re worth! You can go to college and you don’t have to pay for it! Someone else will give you a place to live, food stamps, welfare and health care! In return, you just have to give up on your pride, your dreams and control of your own life....

...

Eighty percent of humanity lives on less than $10 a day. Meanwhile, 96% of the poor in America have televisions, 93% have microwaves and 81% have cell phones. Ultimately, it’s the economic growth produced by capitalistic policies that has allowed America’s poor to do so well compared to the poor in more socialistic nations. Paradoxically, the more we move towards socialism in the name of “helping” the poor, the less poor Americans will ultimately have. That’s because the more regulations, the more taxes and the more GOVERNMENT a country has, the slower its economy grows.

Socialism requires a gargantuan government so it can confiscate property, control behavior and manage an always growing list of programs to achieve “fairness.” Unfortunately, “fairness” is a will-o’-the-wisp that can never be caught because human beings have different levels of talent, skill and effort.

The factory worker who spent 30 years working his way through the ranks to become regional sales manager should make more than the new guy who just started yesterday. The man who spent 10 years building his own successful business should make more money than his employees. The man who invested every extra dime he had and does well should make more money than the fellow who used all his extra money to buy a bigger car and nicer furniture for his house. Socialists say, “Not so fast. Maybe those guys should make more money, but they’re making too much money. We should control how much they make. We should decide how much of their money they get to keep. We should control how much of their money is given away and to whom.”

On the other hand, capitalism is freedom. Capitalism says you should do what you want to do with your own time and either suffer the consequences or reap the rewards. Sure, we might all cooperate to create a military and a police force along with building sewage systems, roads, street lights and stop signs and a few other necessities, but beyond that, let everyone rise and fall as he deserves..."

MFBB.