SATURDAY NIGHT SUEDE, MANIC STREET PREACHERS.

Suede with Stay Together. Released as a single in 1994.





English alternative rock band around Brett Anderson, formed in London in 89. If you're able to stand his voice, they got some relatively good material (not too much, but Trash is OK too).



Manic Street Preachers with A Design for Life. From the 1996 album Everything Must Go.





Three Welsh lunatics - there were four, but Richey Edwards disappeared forever in 1995 - but at least with enough talent to produce around 10 moderately to great songs, and Motorcycle Emptiness is simply brilliant.


Slaap wel.


MFBB.

NANTES, FRANCE. CIVIL WAR SCENES ON THE STREETS AFTER CRIMINAL SHOT DEAD BY POLICE.

Last Tuesday evening, in the western French city of Nantes, a culture enricher with a criminal record you could warm a house with during winter was accidentally shot by a police officer.

And then all hell broke loose.

Three different quarters of Nantes erupted in violent riots:




Via PI-News:

"In der westfranzösischen Stadt Nantes ist es am Dienstagabend nach der Tötung eines schwerkriminellen „jungen Mannes“ (22), durch einen Polizisten in dienstgemäßem „Putativ-Notwehr-Exzess“ zu schweren Zusammenstößen und veritablen Bürgerkriegs-ähnlichen Exzessen gekommen. Nachdem sich das selbstverschuldete Ableben des „jungen Mannes“ im fast ausschließlich von Migranten bewohnten Prekär-Stadtteil Breil-Barberie gegen Abend wie ein Lauffeuer verbreitete, stürmten mit Molotowcocktails bewaffnete Jugendlichen die 300.000-Einwohner-Stadt Nantes. Der Zorn „zahlreicher Bewohner“ (Mainstreammedien) richtete sich gegen alles, was nicht niet- und nagelfest war."

Gist of the story: "In the Western French city of Nantes, on Tuesday evening, after a notorious 22-year old criminal was shot dead by a police officer, scenes reminiscent of a civil war played out. As the news of the "young man's" sought-after death spread like wildfire in the Breil-Barberie city district (heavily populated by migrants), scores of "youths" armed with molotov cocktails stormed the streets in the city of 300,000.

"Lokale Sicherheitskräfte rückten zunächst mit einem Großaufgebot an, um die aufkeimenden Krawalle zu ersticken. Binnen kurzer Zeit sei die Lage dann eskaliert: Randalierer hätten Brandsätze auf Polizisten geschleudert, dutzende Autos angezündet, Geschäfte geplündert und sogar ein Feuer in einem Einkaufszentrum gelegt. Die Sicherheitskräfte setzten zwar Tränengas ein, um die aufgebrachte Menge auseinander zu treiben, was sich bei dem aggressiven Migration-Mob als untauglich herausstellte. Die Unruhen betrafen mehrere als „Brennpunkte“ – im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes – geltende Stadtteile."

Local security services tried to stem the tide. In a very short time the situation escalated: police were pelted, dozens of cars torched, businesses ransacked and even a shopping center was set alight...

"Der Staatsanwalt von Nantes, Pierre Sennès, beschrieb die Lage am späten Abend als „sehr unruhig und unübersichtlich“. Zur Verstärkung wurde eine Division weiterer Polizeikräfte aus Paris in den bretonischen Brennpunkt entsendet. Ein Bewohner von Nantes erklärte schockiert, er habe „Detonationen“ gehört: „Es hat überall gebrannt, sie waren dabei, alles kaputt zu machen.“"

The state prosecutor for Nantes, Pierre Sennès, described the situation in the evening as "very unruly and confusing". Police reinforcements from paris were called in. An inhabitant declared, visibly shocked, that he had heard "detonations": "it was burning everywhere, they tried to destroy everything".

"Zuvor war „ein junger Mann“ wegen einer Ordnungswidrigkeit bei einer Fahrzeugkontrolle gestoppt worden. Bei der Kontrolle habe er „so getan, als wolle er aus dem Fahrzeug aussteigen“, und sei dann „gegen einen Polizeibeamten gefahren“, sagte der örtliche Polizeidirektor Jean-Christophe Bertrand: „Wir haben ihn ruhig gebeten, den Motor abzustellen, auszusteigen und mit den Polizisten auf die Wache zu fahren“, schildert Bertrand den unkontrollierten Ablauf der Kontrolle."

Before a "young man" [Abu Bakr Fofana - MFBB] had been stopped during a traffic control. He swerved away with his car [under surveillance no less in a narcotics case! - MFBB] in such a way that a police officer was wounded. Local Police Chief Jean)-Christophe Bertrand stated that he was asked calmly to stop the engine, get out of the car, and accompany the police to the local precinct.

„Es hat gedauert, bis wir die Identität des Mannes klären konnten. Gegen 5:30 Uhr heute Morgen wussten wir, dass er der Polizei bekannt war“, erklärte die Polizei-Präfektin des Departements. Der 22-jährige Multikriminelle stammt aus Garges-les-Gonesse (Val d’Oise) und wurde laut Staatsanwaltschaft seit Juni 2017 per Haftbefehl gesucht. Ihm wurde unter anderem bandenmäßiger Diebstahl und Hehlerei vorgeworfen. Nun auch ein Mordversuch an einem Polizisten."

By 5:30 on Wednesday morning it became clear that the dead youngster was actually an acquaintance of the police. The 22-year old from Garges-les-Gonesse (Val d'Oise) was being sought after since June 2017 for organized theft and selling of stolen goods.


On his blog, Thomas Joly reports that scores of new Frenchmen and -women took to the streets after the riots to "demand justice for Fofana":





Which is a howler of cosmic proportions really, considering that at age 22 young Fofana was already a seasoned criminal.


After three days of riots, François de Rugy, who is Chairman of the Assemblée National (the lower chamber of French Parliament), tried to enter the Breil quartier in Nantes in order to reach out to the New Frenchmen and Frenchwomen and feel their pain, but his car was encircled by an angry mob and forced out, François Desouche reports. In the United States, this would mean that Speaker Paul Ryan would try to get into, dunno, St Louis or Baltimore after a serious riot to sob for the Trayvon Martin du jour and they had felt compelled to set the city center ablaze to calm their nerves, but that Paul would get the cold shoulder treatment.


So Paul Ryan's colleague is forced out of Breil/Nantes, it is time to wonder where Boy Macron is in all of this? Well, when Nantes was in flames he was partying in a nightclub in Lagos, Nigeria, to "celebrate African creativity":





Speaking of African creativity, in an amazing display of said quality the protestors decided to torch a school also:





More examples of African/muslim creativity at work:








If you import the Third World, you become the Third World.


There is one bright spot however: the personal vehicle of the mayor of Nantes, Johanna Rolland (Parti Socialiste, but I suspect you suspected that already) was torched too:








Johanna Rolland, staunch champion of all things multicultural as long as it has nothing to do with Chateau Petrus, the Panthéon, Honoré de Balzac and Gustave Flaubert, Amiens Cathedral, the works of Molière, the Bayeux tapestry or gruyère cheese, to name but a few, is a great friend of her muslim co-citoyens. So much so that in 2015 she rushed to their defense when some "islamophobic" tags were discovered on the Al mohsinine mosque in Nantes:





At the time, Rolland shared her indignation with this outrageous act of vandalism via Twitter:





Good to know the lady has her priorities straight.


This was Outlaw Mike reporting from Europe, the Solar System's biggest Open Air Lunatic Asylum.


MFBB.

RECOMMENDED READS: STEPHEN BASKERVILLE'S "THE NEW POLITICS OF SEX".

Over at The Federalist, Paul Rowan Brian obviously has delved deep in Stephen Baskerville's new book, The New Politics of Sex.

"...Baskerville pins the blame for society’s woes on sexual radicals who are agitating directly and indirectly for the destruction of the family, and men in particular. This is a keystone book, especially in the Age of the Incel, although it’s worth noting that those who read it may go from being an incel (involuntarily celibate) to a volcel (voluntarily celibate).

Baskerville’s thesis is that the effects of the sexual revolution have led the West to the brink of social and economic ruin. Think of the inverse of “The Handmaid’s Tale”: no patriarchal dystopia but instead a bloated welfare state run into the ground by shrieking feminists and perpetually aggrieved outrage merchants justifying their own power by worsening the very problems they claim to be solving. Baskerville identifies ongoing efforts by radical feminists and homosexual activists to demonize and dismantle the two-parent heterosexual family and shows how these movements are deeply intertwined with a dangerous growth in state power and bureaucratic intrusion.

“Feminists and more recently homosexual political activists have now positioned themselves at the vanguard of left-wing politics, shifting the political discourse from the economic and racial to the social and increasingly the sexual,” Baskerville writes, adding that these groups are pursuing a “social and sexual confrontation with the private family, marriage, masculinity, and religion.”







The Honey Trap

The go-to tactic to take down families and men is basically a sort of politically correct honey trap.

“The power to define crime and sin is the claim to rule, and desecrating and discarding the old taboos is merely the prelude to issuing new ones,” Baskerville observes. First the sexually liberated promote “unimpeded freedom—especially sexual freedom—and then criminalize those—usually the men—who engage in it.”

Although he briefly acknowledges that young men shouldn’t give into the temptation to “hook up” and use women merely for pleasure in the first place, Baskerville contends that focusing on men’s partial culpability in the outer cycle of immorality ignores the more vital issue of how the trap has been set up and its purpose.

“As always, the most effective weapon for destroying men is sex, and the battle reduces to who controls the terms of sexuality,” Baskerville notes, slamming “Maoist” sexual radicals on college campuses and lily-livered academics who pay homage to feminism and outlandish gender ideologies before offering even the mildest critique of them. It’s all a recipe for doom.

“Sexual liberation cannot possibly result in any outcome other than the arbitrary and blanket criminalization of heterosexual men and from there to the collapse of the rule of law altogether,” Baskerville writes.

Interestingly, The New Politics of Sex also observes that militant communism and sexual radicalism share deep patterns of reasoning, notably viewing even reproduction itself as oppression. Friedrich Engels, for example, wrote that “the first division of labor is that between man and woman for the propagation of children.” Such twisted logic transitions seamlessly into radical feminism, where the oppressor is not the entrepreneurial class but the family itself. “A mother may love her son dearly, but he is nevertheless a member of a class that has controlled and oppressed her,” writes feminist lunatic Anne Schaef. “As a result, she cannot help but feel rage and hostility toward him.”

Baskerville quotes Harvard literature professor Ruth Wisse, who observes that feminism is a “neo-Marxist movement” that’s “done to the American home what communism did to the Russian economy, and most of the ruin is irreversible.” The New Politics of Sex takes pains to emphasize that it’s not just another book decrying moral rot but instead a wake-up call to the Right to realize all the governmental and judicial power it is ceding unnecessarily to the Left.

“Sexual ideology is more than libertinism. The inseparable corollary is authoritarian—what one scholar calls ‘punitive feminism,’” Baskerville writes, adding that offending someone is now a crime requiring “official campaigns to ‘re-educate.’”


Complacent Conservatives

Baskerville singles out the growth and expansion of divorce legislation passed in the 1970s as worthy of particular condemnation. According to Baskerville, “some 80 percent of divorces are unilateral.” No-fault divorce can speedily remove a father of his possessions, children, and wife—and overturns sacred marriage covenants without a second glance. Baskerville slams the church for not fighting hard enough against no-fault divorce, noting that “in the most critical contest between church and state begun four decades ago with no-fault divorce in the United States, the churches surrendered without a fight.”

Christians who feel hounded by hostile government policies on everything from gay marriage to abortion would do well to consider how much of the flak they’re now getting derives its toxicity and puissance from the emotionalized reasoning initially employed in expansions of divorce law from the “nebulousness of the transgression” to “the central role of the accuser’s subjective ‘feelings,’ and the presumption of guilt against the accused.”

In The New Politics of Sex, Baskerville presents a nightmare future of entitled alternative families and sexual libertines wresting control of the vast welfare state apparatus for their various short-sighted, hedonistic, and harmful agendas.

“The radicals demand not only ‘freedom from state regulation of our sexual lives and gender choices, identities and expression,’ which of course was granted long ago. The state (meaning the rest of the population) must also support these ‘households’: ‘access for all to vital government support programs, including but not limited to: affordable and adequate health care, affordable housing, a secure and enhanced Social Security system,” Baskerville writes. “Because taxation is collected through the penal system and ultimately at gunpoint, this effectively enslaves the sexually restrained to the sexually liberated.”

Baskerville hits hard at conservatives in this book, too, saying they’re too timid and complacent. He cites F. Roger Devlin’s Sexual Utopia in Power and critiques the conservative habit of denouncing misbehavior from the Left with the language and reasoning of the Left. For example, Baskerville argues that conservatives should have denounced Bill Clinton for cheating on his wife, but instead aped progressive rhetoric.

“One need only observe the zeal with which conservative political operatives abandon traditional stigmas against quaint, old-fashioned concepts like adultery or fornication and adopt sexualized agitprop jargon, whose full implications they do not and cannot comprehend, when they opportunistically accuse President Bill Clinton of ‘sexual harassment’ or Muslims of ‘homophobia,’” Baskerville writes.


Big Business Socialism

Baskerville says conservatives who complain about cultural decay are missing what’s happening right around them as their governments and institutions from the state level to the United Nations are taken over by radical feminists and sexual activists: “Conservatives see only the libertinism and individual license. Their failure to understand the collective lust for power leaves them impotent—lamenting and bemoaning the hedonistic debauchery but helpless to check the militants’ consolidation of government power.”

Feminists and other gender and sexual radicals worsen the problems they purport to solve, he says. “This trait feminism shares with other radical ideologies but carries much further: the capacity to expand its power exponentially by creating the very problems about which it complains,” he writes, adding that “in every case the alleged hardship exists, if it exists at all, only because women and children have first been separated from, and set in opposition to, the families and men that traditionally protected and provided for them—as demanded by sexual radicals themselves.”

This is where the welfare state comes in, when the man leaves, as Baskerville continues to sketch out his horrifying blueprint of a society built on reckless sexual license and feminist extremism.

“Originally justified to provide for the families of men who had been laid off during economic downturns or eliminated by war, the welfare state quickly became a subsidy on single-mother homes and fatherless children,” Baskerville writes. “In good bureaucratic fashion, that is, it immediately set in to vastly expand and effectively to create precisely the problem of poverty it claimed to be alleviating.”

The welfare state, expanded continuously for the supposed well-being of single mothers and their kids, is a way for government to intrude into the last remaining place it was formerly barred from: parenthood...."

Initially I wasn't sure I'd follow either Brian or Baskerville all along in their thesis, because so many bigshots and champions of Big Government do not exactly project themselves deviant sexual prowess (I'm thinking here about the likes of HRC or Jeremy Corbyn - outwardly they almost look asexual). But after a while I started to agree - more or less. Their personal shenanigans - or the seemingly nonexistence thereof - are irrelevant. It's their destructive encouragement to others that matters - like promoting the idea that a woman can do as she sees fit and eschew the oh so protective (and thus denigrating, at least for them scoundrels) role of a straight, true, caring male in a traditional relationship. After all, who needs males like that? When The State will take care for wretched damsels getting themselves in a mess, thru the promiscuous lifestyles championed by the political talking heads of that very same state?

Of course, history is replete with gazillions of examples of grossly deviant sexual behaviour of the minions and propagandists of said Merkels and Clintons. John Maynard Keynes, who went to the Bloomsbury's country retreat in the South Downs to screw Duncan Grant and others comes to mind, but also, for instance, in my neck of the woods Mieke Vogels of the Flemish Greens, who as Flemish Welfare Minister in 2001 launched an explicit campaign to let Flemish youngsters indulge in sex à volonté with no matter who or what. Below you see her photos plus the front of one of the accompanying brochures, enthusiastically promoting gay sex. The caption reads: "Say something, dick. Open your mouth before you have sex".





Of course, that was 2001. Advertising for sexual deviancy has gotten a tad more realistic in the years since. But to get to the point, no one in his or her right mind would ever say Mieke Vogels was a libertarian. She, too, was and is, apart from being a mouthpiece for screwing your way through life, also a Grand Champion for an ever more powerful state.


MFBB.

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY!!!

To all the Real Americans out there, a (somewhat belated) Happy 4th of July!!!





And it ain't Saturday yet, but I figure we all can have a little laugh, can't we?





Zhe lady in gold has adorable t*tties. I sincerely hope that remark is sexist enough?



MFBB.

TUESDAY VIDEO DUMP.

The following clip from French TV discusses the taking over of streets in French cities by muslims for their prayers, and this despite the fact that sometimes neighboring mosques are only half full. The public prayers are thus a clear sign of a hostile takeover, and an act of defiance vis-à-vis the French Republic:



The woman, Céline Pina, is an ex-Parti Socialiste politician who saw the light. She authored a book, Silence Coupable (Guilty Silence) which has as subtitle: "The islamists are big only because our elites are on their knees."


And while muslims all over Europe take over the streets with impunity, defying their host country's laws, Tommy Robinson who merely did the work the journaille should do, lingers in prison:





Please, write a letter of support to Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, but Stephen Lennon will do. This should be the correct address:


Stephen Lennon
Prisoner A2084CG
HMP Onley
Rugby
Warwickshire
CV23 8AP


Hat tip for both videos Gates of Vienna.



MFBB.