SATURDAY NIGHT MANIC STREET PREACHERS, THOM YORKE.

Manic Street Preachers with If you tolerate this your children will be next. Album This Is My Truth Tell Me Yours (1998).





The song is meant as an homage to the Welsh volunteers who joined the International Brigades to fight Franco's troops. MSP have always made it crystal clear which side they are on. Yes, I know both sides were guilty of atrocities. Only one side has been forever blamed however, most notably under the latest socialist schmuck, Zapatero.


Thom Yorke with Hearing Damage, from the soundtrack of the Twilight movie New Moon (2009).





I'm sorry to read that his partner of 23 years, Rachel Owen, with whom he has a son and a daughter, passed away as recently as December 2016. RIP.



Slaap wel.


MFBB.

RECOMMENDED READS: TIMOTHY BENSON ON CLIMATE ALARMISTS GUNH HO FOR ABORTION (TO SAVE THE PLANET).

A must read over at American Thinker, by Timothy Benson: "Climate Alarmists: abort your 'extra' children."

"Over the past few years, outlets such as NPR, the Atlantic Monthly, the Huffington Post, and the Guardian have written articles with headlines like “Should We Be Having Kids in the Age of Climate Change?,” “The Climate Change Solution No One Will Talk About,” “Voluntary Birth Control Is a Climate Change Solution Nobody Wants to Talk About,” and “Though Climate Change is a Crisis, the Population Threat is Even Worse.”

The NPR story highlights a 2016 paper by philosophers and bioethicists at Georgetown University and Johns Hopkins University, titled "Population Engineering and the Fight against Climate Change," which argues in favor of penalizing families for having children via a progressive tax that would increase with each child.

In his new Netflix series, "Bill Nye Saves the World," the show’s eponymous host asked a group of panelists, including one of the Georgetown professors, “Should we have policies that penalize people for having extra kids in the developed world?” The question from Nye, of course, is a rhetorical one. (Strikingly, unlike normal humans, none of the panelists found it creepy and disturbing that Nye said “extra kids.”)

Not content to let Nye hog all that creepiness for himself, ur-feminist Gloria Steinem charged the “patriarchy” with causing climate change by forcing women not to have all those abortions they secretly want, leading to overpopulation and “climate deprivation.” This unfortunately low number of abortions, according to Steinem, is “the fundamental cause of climate change.”

“People around the world are beginning to address [climate change] by reducing their carbon footprint through less consumption and better technology,” wrote the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD). “But unsustainable human population growth can overwhelm those efforts, leading us to conclude that we not only need smaller footprints, but fewer feet… Long-term population reduction to ecologically sustainable levels will solve the global warming crisis and move us to toward a healthier, more stable, post-fossil fuel, post-growth addicted society.”

“It is obvious that fifty years hence the world cannot support three billion people,” - William Vogt, 1948. Sounds a lot like:
"We have 100 months to act to save the planet" - Prince Charles, 2009.

"Twentieth-century neo-Malthusianism would be taken up by environmentalists after World War II, gaining steam after the publication of Fairfield Osborn’s Our Plundered Planet and William Vogt’s The Road to Survival in 1948. “It is obvious that fifty years hence the world cannot support three billion people,” Vogt wrote. “Unless population increases can be stopped, we might as well give up the struggle.” Vogt was wrong: Seventy years after this forecast, Earth is supporting not merely 3 billion but 7.5 billion people.

Twenty years after Osborn and Vogt, Paul Ehrlich -- in his 1968 bestseller, The Population Bomb -- predicted mass starvation in the 1970s and 1980s due to overpopulation. “The battle to feed all of humanity is over,” he wrote. “In the 1970’s the world will undergo famines --hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash program embarked upon.” These famines and mass human die-offs never materialized.

Doubling down on this, Ehrlich argued in a speech before the British Institute for Biology in 1971 that “by the year 2000, the United Kingdom will be simply a small group of impoverished islands, inhabited by some 70 million hungry people… If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”

Fortunately for Britons, Ehrlich is a notoriously bad gambler. (Just ask Julian Simon.) In 2000, the United Kingdom was home to 58 million people with a per-capita gross domestic product of $26,400. At $1.555 trillion in gross domestic product, it was the world’s fourth-largest economy. Even in 2017, Dear Old Blighty continues to be the opposite of the poor and starving world envisioned by Ehrlich in 1971..."

I remember having to learn the conclusions of the Club of Rome. Must have been around 1978-1979. Today, it's obvious it was all a pile of steaming elephant shit. The very same kind of people are urging us now to cripple our economies and, as this article shows, to abort what few (WHITE) children we have... to "save the planet".

"... The Club of Rome, in Mankind at the Turning Point, its 1974 doomsday follow-up to 1972’s doomsday book The Limits to Growth, literally says, “The World Has Cancer and the Cancer is Man.” Robert Zubrin, in his book Merchants of Despair, writes “this idea [that] humans are cancer upon the Earth, a horde of vermin whose unconstrained aspirations and appetites are endangering the natural order… is the core idea of antihumanism.”

“Antihumanism,” he states, “is not environmentalism, though it sometimes masquerades as such. Environmentalism, properly conceived, is an effort to apply practical solutions to real environmental problems, such as air and water pollution, for the purpose of making the world a better place for all humans to thrive in. Antihumanism, in contrast, rejects the goals of advancing the cause of mankind. Rather, it uses instances of inadvertent human damage to the environment as point of agitation to promote its fundamental thesis that human beings are pathogens whose activities need to be suppressed in order to protect a fixed ecological order with interests that stand above those of humanity.”

The call for population-control measures to fight climate change is at its core, anti-human. As Zubrin continues, “Since all human activity must perforce release [carbon dioxide], all human existence is a crime against nature. Therefore nothing we can do is right -- and so, in the name of the Higher Good, we must be constrained to do as little as possible. Thus, the global warming argument recasts the basic Malthusian line in a novel form, but with the equivalent end result. Instead of claiming that human activity must be limited because there are not enough resources, it is said that what is limited is not resources, but the right to use resources. It all amounts to the same thing: there isn’t enough to go around, therefore human aspirations must be crushed.”

Warmists. Bunch of creeps.


MFBB.

REFUGEES WELCOME!!!

Says Sad Dick Khan.




No one knows even remotely how many terrorists there are among the muslim 'refugees' flooding Western Europe. Or how they compare to the number of 'homegrown' ones. What is certain is that the sum total of both categories is catastrophic. For the UK, the big news last week was not the elections - although Labour's strong gains are a very strong reason for serious concern in themselves - but the estimated 23,000 UK-based muslim terrorists, as projected by British security services. Via Express:

"The number of potential UK-based terrorists on the radar of the British security services is as high as 23,000, it has emerged.

The figure is more than six times the figure previously released by the Home Office at the time of last month's Manchester bombing.

Then, it was revealed the security services had 500 live investigations into more than 3,000 suspected radical jihadis, including about 400 people who have remarkably been allowed to return to our shores after fighting with terror group Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.

But, it has since emerged a further 20,000 radical Islamists have been considered a "person of interest" to the security services at anyone time, according to a security services source.

It is not clear over which timescale the figure relates to.

But, the news has led to fears there are simply not enough resources for our security forces and counter terror police to monitor all their activities at anyone time.

A Whitehall source said 18 terror plots in the UK have been foiled since 2013, including five since the London terror attack in March.

But round-the-clock monitoring of terror suspects is only possible in a handful of cases due to limited resources, the priority of which are determined on factors including credibility of intelligence and the apparent seriousness of the individual's intent, according to the source.

But, Salman Abedi, who killed 22 people and injured 116 others at the Ariana Grande concert at Manchester Arena on May 22 was a "person of interest" who slipped the net and was allowed to travel from the UK to Libya and return in the run up to the atrocity.

Investigations are underway into how this was able to happen."

Yeah right.


MFBB.

SHOCKING: CNN ORCHESTRATES FAKE MUSLIM DEMO TO SUPPORT MYTH OF ISIS NOT BEING 'REAL' ISLAM!!!

Via Conservative Treehouse and American Thinker, watch and shiver: CNN's Becky Anderson, together with British media and a few police officers actually STAGE a fake demo to propagate the myth of the 'good, peace-loving, tolerant, silent muslim majority':





Here's another version of the event, narrated by Mark Dice, who, it appears, was on the scene:





Because videos tend to disappear - especially the ones like this! - I have some stills for you: in the first one, you see how white police officers are leaving the scene... to be replaced by, ah, police officers of 'Asian' origin!!!





Here the first 'Asian' officer makes his appearance. Wonderful!





What do we need now? We need masses of moderate muslims!!! And miracolo, we just found them, all twenty of them:





The woman seen on the back, closest by, is Becky Anderson. But uh-oh, twenty does not look exactly like a crowd, huh? No problem, let's take a shot from another spot up front. Now notice the bearded, bespectacled guy with the green lapels. In the next still, that shot from another direction is the one used by Associated Press, but that don't matter, it's CNN material:





You see that very same bearded, bespectacled guy prominently left of center, holding a sign "ISIS=ENEMIES OF HUMANITY". Golly, who knew? But you will agree that suddenly it does look a bit, uh, 'crowdier' huh?

The real howler is Becky Anderson's intro: “What we want to show you now viewers, is a wonderful scene. These are Muslim Mums…” Etc etc etc. In the 2011 census held in the Greater London area, muslims numbered 12.4% of the population, translating, at the time, in 1,012,823 individuals. You can be fairly certain that in the six years since, that number has augmented significantly - keep in mind that the UK's muslim population as a whole surpassed 3.5 million in 2016 and by some estimates grows 75 per cent every ten years. Now, all that Becky Anderson could come up with, out of that gigantic mass of London muslims... is a miserable 20 or so followers of the prophet??? In a staged event, no less?? If that is "the best in London's Borough neighborhood" - dixit Associated Press - you might want to reconsider buying that cottage in the Cotswolds for your retirement.

One would be laughing his/her *ss off, if it wasn't so utterly tragic. Fake News, brought to you by... the network that last month refused a President Trump ad on the grounds that they considered it... fake news.

Islam is cancer, no matter what the MSM is trying to sell you, and I keep repeating myself, but as long as we do not understand and fully acknowledge that basic reality, nothing is going to get better, au contraire.



MFBB.

RECOMMENDED VIDEOS: MARK STEYN ON THE LATEST RELIGION OF PEACE ATROCITY.

Londoners, YOU preferred the blessings of the multicultural society. YOU elected Sadiq Khan. Don't come whining.


Mark Steyn weighs in, and as per usual, he nails it:





Belgian daily De Standaard has already managed to give a forum to the umpteenth islam apologist. While the dead were carted off to the mortuary, they tripped over each other's feet to open another can of cuddle muslims and pulled out a 'writer and choreographer', a fella by the name of Ish Ait Hamou. In the De Standaard article, Mr Hamou elaborates on the Open Letter he wrote on his Facebook page to one of the terrorists, opining that "You wanted to be a hero, but you will be remembered as a coward". Er, no, Mr Hamou. You got it exactly assbackwards. The terrs were cowards, but they will be remembered, at least by the overwhelming majority of the muslim community, as heroes:

'Writer and choreographer Ish Ait Hamou has, on his Facebook page, reacted to the attack in London with a letter directed at the terrorist. 'Every time I see your last deed or hear your last word, I always have to think of your beginnings. What happened to you?'

There follows a long, toe-curling diatribe where the 'writer' does his utmost best to bore us to death by stacking one teary-eyed platitude upon another. I must admit, he almost succeeded, which would have made Outlaw de facto the eighth victim of this latest reaching out project of the religion of pieces.

Luckily, I am made of sterner stuff than your average De Standaard editor, and I have now recovered enough to offer an eloquent answer to Mr Hamou's question: "What happened to you?"

It's quite simple, asshole. ISLAM happened to him.

And until sufficient people understand that it's ISLAM that drives people to commit these heinous crimes, we are in for the next slaughter. And the next. And the one after that. And on and on and on.

We can conclude that at De Standaard, they again have learned NOTHING.

And I hate to say it, but neither has the UK government.

It's 2am here on Monday morning. Prepare, oh dear reader, for a barrage of tweets of our beloved Euro leaders and politicians tomorrow in which they express their shock at this terrible, ah, incident; their solidarity with the victims and their relatives; their gratitude and respect for the security and first aid services; and their absolute commitment to 'stand firm and united'.

I think I will puke in advance. My advice if tomorrow you see an idiot heading for the crime scene, carrying a teddy bear and a candle?

Punch him/her/it to the ground. Make it hurt. Does that qualify as hate speech, Chief Turd Constable of Greater Manchester Ian Hopkins? GOOD.

Pray for the victims and their relatives.



MFBB.