Saturday, September 14, 2013

SATURDAY NIGHT PRIMAL SCREAM, AZTEC CAMERA, AC/DC.

Primal Scream with Rocks.




Scottish alternative rock band formed in 1982 in Glasgow by Bobby Gillespie and Jim Beattie. They are still around.



In 1988, another Scottish band by the name of Aztec Camera, be it of the New Wave variety, had a hit with Somewhere in my heart. From the album Love.




Frontman is Roddy Frame, who formed Aztec Camera in 1980 in Glasgow.



We end this Saturday Night Music with AC/DC's Highway to Hell.




Duh. Sumpin went wroung? That ain't Angus Young?



Have a good night's sleep, if possible.


MFBB.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

RECOMMENDED READS: J.R. DUNN'S THREE-AND-A-HALF MORE YEARS OF OBAMA!

One should not miss this brilliant analysis by American Thinker's J.R. Dunn re the past and present behavior of Obama and, by extension, the entire Democratic Party.


"...There are three-and-a-half years of agony lying ahead. It won't be pleasant, but there is a saving grace. Barack Obama and his childishness, incompetence, and fanatical fixation on dead political ideas constitute the apotheosis of a longer-term conundrum, that of a liberal/left that has infiltrated this country's institutions to a point that state power and interference with individual liberties increases steadily no matter who is in office.

Obama offers us a chance to reject all that decisively. I want every single train of events set in motion by Obama, his administration, and his supporters, down to the last halfwit college undergrad, to play out in full. I want every disaster that fool and his parade of twitches have triggered to blossom in bleak completion. I want to see all their trains collide, all their ships sink, all their airships burnt to cinders.


 photo obama_mad_zpsfa3e129b.jpg


We're talking tragedy and retribution, in the absolute Greek sense -- the Furies howling at midnight. Maybe that's what it takes to cleanse this nation of this doctrinal pestilence. I want to see every Row A voter reduced to remorse. I want to see their noses rubbed in it. I want to hear each victim of this regime cry out to heaven for vengeance. If all this comes to pass, we may even see Democrats, fearful for their own political hides, wanting to be rid of him.
But if Obama were impeached, none of this would happen. Instead the focus would shift to Congress and the GOP, who then would be blamed for everything that occurs, no matter who -- likely Smilin' Joe Biden -- inhabits the Oval Office. When the disasters come -- and they will (most of them are on track at this moment and can't be turned around except through drastic action which Obama and all other visible Democrats are incapable of) -- they will be dumped into the laps of the Republicans. No other group in modern history has proven more adept at shifting blame than the liberal left, just as no other political party has proven more apt to stumble into the spotlight at the worst possible moment than the GOP.

Looking back from our fine vantage point here at the edge of the Abyss, we can trace the path clearly. Despite popular belief, the New Deal solved nothing. There was a second crash -- one that makes none of the history textbooks -- in October 1937 that wiped out all gains made in the previous four years and left unemployment higher than it had been when FDR entered office. By January 1938, Roosevelt was reduced to pleading with his advisors "Can no one tell me what to do?" Nobody could, and the country continued its downward spiral.

It was saved by Adolf Hitler, who in March annexed Austria, rolling into Vienna behind a spearhead of Panzers. This wakeup call revealed that war was inevitable, and the tariff barriers that had prevented international economic recovery fell as the nations of Europe scrambled to purchase weaponry and supplies. In the U.S., plants reopened (despite an insane attempt -- by the GOP, no less -- to stifle this using the Neutrality Act), industry began to gain ground, and by 1940 the U.S. was back on its feet.

Roosevelt found his sweet spot in leading the Allied coalition to victory, something nobody would have believed him capable of even ten years earlier. The success of FDR the Warlord covered the failure of his economic policies. The New Deal became a retroactive success due to WW II. By this means, the legend of liberal triumph entered American consciousness.

Skipping over Harry Truman, the last practical Democratic president, and John F. Kennedy, the last conservative Democratic president, we come to Lyndon Johnson. LBJ was a pure ideologue, a product of the New Deal who believed its dogma (which, not coincidentally, fitted his paternalistic, controlling persona to near perfection) implicitly. Amid the reaction to JFK's murder, LBJ was able to pass a barge load of ultraliberal programs that would never have seen a vote under ordinary circumstances.: Medicare, Medicaid, the War on Poverty, all comprising what he called his "Great Society". Thanks to Keynesian financing, LBJ managed to suck the life out of the 1960s boom in little more than four years, leaving the nation headed for economic ruin. Along with the Vietnam War and his fumbling of the racial question, this left him as one of the most despised presidents of the century. He abdicated office in 1968, having served only one and a third terms.

.....


....What we see clearly from this record is that American liberals have always managed to avoid responsibility. Global war saved Roosevelt and established the myth of triumphant New Deal liberalism. None of the liberal presidents thereafter -- excepting Clinton -- served two full terms, leaving the consequences of their actions - and the blame -- to be borne by their Republican successors. Clinton avoided this only by shifting to the right. Add to this the fact that several GOP presidents -- Nixon and the Bushes -- stumbled along in a "center" that was actually far to the left, muddying the political record considerably, and it's evident how the narrative has been tilted leftward.

Liberals have never had to pay the piper. They have never had to face their failures or come up with explanations for what went wrong. Neither Johnson nor Carter served second terms in which their errors would have become manifest. Instead, Nixon and Reagan had to bear the responsibility. And of course, the GOP has never made a point of this.

But now we have Obama. The first true progressive to achieve a second term since FDR. There's no "triangulation" needed by the man who knows everything, and no war, it seems, to pull him out of this swamp. Obama will have to take full responsibility for his policies. He will have to stand in the dock, and with him, for the first time in seventy years, liberalism as a whole.

Obama is less lucky than FDR, less competent than Jimmy Carter, and less flexible than Bill Clinton. With Obama, all the failures of liberalism are coming to a head. He has put more liberal policies into effect in a shorter period than any other president, but thanks to his unique combination of ineptness, ignorance, inexperience, and arrogance, every last one of them is doomed. All of them are failing as we watch. His economic policies have repeated the failures of FDR's New Deal, with worse to come. His health care "reform" is in a state of collapse before it has even started. His stewardship of race relations has returned the country to a state of nearly open hostility and panic not seen since 1968. His Hallmark card foreign policy has killed tens of thousands overseas and will almost inevitably lead to the deaths of millions, as did the policies of Jimmy Carter in countries as unrelated as Nicaragua, Iran, Ethiopia, and Cambodia.


 photo obama_incompetent_zps99d96261.jpg


Do we really want to give him an out? Do we want to release him to a well-paying sinecure position to become the black Jimmy Carter, an international pest and embarrassment? Do we want to allow the liberal left to slide one more time? To scamper out of the line of fire only to return to mock and sabotage the efforts of better men to clean up the heartbreaking mess they left behind, as they did in the early 1970s, the Reagan 80s, the Bush Oughts? Do we want to see them pop back up in 2020 or 24 with the same nonsense programs given different names and the same insults and attacks for their opponents exhausted and in despair at attempting to repair what can no longer be repaired?

I say no. I prefer that we drink this cup to the dregs, take this road to its lonely end. The liberals need to undergo the whipping that they have dodged for over seven decades. The voters of this country, who have treated politics like a reality series, need to be backhanded by the world as it exists. We require a rude awakening. This country's pols, both left and right, need to be overwhelmed with worry as to what the next day will bring. The people of this country need to be buried up to their necks in the results of their own infantilism. All the fantasy castles need to be demolished to the last stone. Liberalism must be discredited and humiliated, its adherents defeated and dispersed. The leader of the whole circus must be tormented to the human limit and beyond, forced to break down in front of the cameras as he begs for help that will not come."



This Creep-in-Chief breaks the Nation; let him own it.


MFBB.

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

REMEMBERING 9/11.



It really is that simple.

The stark, naked truth.



MFBB.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

INCREASE IN ARCTIC ICE OF ALMOST ONE MILLION SQUARE MILES COMPARED TO LAST YEAR. UH, HELLO AL GORE? MICHAEL MANN?

Hey. Psssssst. BBC.

PPPPPPPPPPPPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BBC???


Remember this?


 photo BBC_arctic_icefree_by_2013_zps7a865e41.jpg


However, on the continent the BBC's buddies at De Standaard, Belgium's Oracle, were even more brazen as late as May of this year, when they were shedding torrents of tears over the imminent 'Cold Rush'. Lamenting that the melting Artic Ice would render the exploitation of the Arctic's fossil fuel deposits an enticing prospect to the regional power brokers, De Standaard's Jorn Van Thillo - I assume it's Jorn Van Thillo, it's his initials on top of the article - wrote:


 photo DeStandaardColdRushMay2013_zps64748f1b.jpg



WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO KNOW ABOUT THE NORTH POLE 'COLD RUSH'?
How quick is Arctic Ice melting?


"The North Pole's ice is clearly melting faster and faster.

In the summer of 2012, the Arctic Ice Shelf shrunk to 3.4 million square kilometers. That is 50 per cent less than the average values of the eighties and nineties. Withing three to five years the Northern Ice Sea can in summer become a cold pap of fresh and salt water, estimates the White House [aha! - emphasis mine, MFBB].

The report states that land ice and permafrost are also melting quicker than ever.

What are the consequences for the environment?

The growing exploitation of Arctic resources threatens the North Pole's vulnerable ecosystem, according to a UN report. The melting of the ice is causing a 'Cold Rush' to the Pole's fossil fuels - substances which have actually caused the melting.

Climate Change is contributing the rise of the global sea level and threatens animal species like the Icebear.

The melting ice is a catastrophe, not a profit generating opportunity, declared actor and environmental activist Ezra Miller who participated in an action on the North Pole."


My oh my what a crybaby. Let's start putting faces on the whiners. From De Standaard Online, Jorn Van Thillo's picture:

 photo Jorn_Van_Thillo_zps4951f8d1.jpg


Look at him. Twentysomething, think's he's cool, is convinced of his Higher Calling. No doubt does his utmost best to live Da Sustainable Life, tryin' to keep his carbon footprint as shallow as possible. Take a good look at this fella's face people: here we have a species that has NEVER in his young life heard a different tune than the one emanating from our moral betters, the Champions and High Priests of the EUSSR, the joys of Gay Marriage and ditto adoption, the wonders of Multiculturalism, the Nanny State as solver of all problems, the Quest of saving the Earth of Us Dirty Humans.


Well if you care so much about ice bears drowning in lukewarm north pole water dude, I've got GOOD NEWS for you actually. From The Telegraph, September 8, 2013:


GLOBAL WARMING? NO, ACTUALLY WE'RE COOLING, CLAIM SCIENTISTS.
A cold Arctic summer has led to a record increase in the ice cap, leading experts to predict a period of global cooling.

....

"There has been a 60 per cent increase in the amount of ocean covered with ice compared to this time last year, they equivalent of almost a million square miles.

In a rebound from 2012's record low an unbroken ice sheet more than half the size of Europe already stretches from the Canadian islands to Russia's northern shores, days before the annual re-freeze is even set to begin.

The Northwest Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific has remained blocked by pack-ice all year, forcing some ships to change their routes.

A leaked report to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) seen by the Mail on Sunday, has led some scientists to claim that the world is heading for a period of cooling that will not end until the middle of this century.

If correct, it would contradict computer forecasts of imminent catastrophic warming. The news comes several years after the BBC predicted that the arctic would be ice-free by 2013..."



Duh.


 photo icesheet20122013_zpsaf033da6.jpg


Oops.


Now are we going to hear about this 60 per cent increase in our MSM? Will Jorn Van Thillo write a happy article about it?

Count on it.

Not.



MFBB.