Friday, April 20, 2018


Via VDare, Enoch Powell's speech to the Annual General Meeting of the West Midlands Area Conservative Political Centre, Birmingham, England, April 20, 1968.

"The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils.

In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature. One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: At each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future. Above all, people are disposed to mistake predicting troubles for causing troubles and even for desiring troubles: "if only", they love to think, "if only people wouldn't talk about it, it probably wouldn't happen". Perhaps this habit goes back to the primitive belief that the word and the thing, the name and the object, are identical.

At all events, the discussion of future grave but, with effort now, avoidable evils is the most unpopular and at the same time the most necessary occupation for the politician. Those who knowingly shirk it, deserve, and not infrequently receive, the curses of those who come after.

A week or two ago I fell into conversation with a constituent, a middle-aged, quite ordinary working man employed in one of our nationalized industries. After a sentence or two about the weather, he suddenly said: "If I had the money to go, I wouldn't stay in this country."

I made some deprecatory reply, to the effect that even this Government wouldn't last for ever; but he took no notice, and continued: "I have three children, all of them have been through grammar school and two of them married now, with family. I shan't be satisfied till I have seen them settled overseas. In this country in fifteen or twenty years' time the black man will have the whip hand over the white man."

I can already hear the chorus of execration. How dare I say such a horrible thing? How dare I stir up trouble and inflame feelings by repeating such a conversation?

The answer is that I do not have the right not to do so. Here is a decent, ordinary fellow Englishman, who in broad daylight in my own town says to me, his Member of Parliament, that this country will not be worth living in for his children. I simply do not have the right to shrug my shoulders and think about something else.

What he is saying, thousands and hundreds of thousands are saying and thinking—not throughout Great Britain, perhaps, but in the areas that are already undergoing the total transformation to which there is no parallel in a thousand years of English history.

In fifteen or twenty years, on present trends, there will be in this country 3 1/2 million Commonwealth immigrants and their descendants. That is not my figure. That is the official figure given to Parliament by the spokesman of the Registrar General's office. There is no comparable official figure for the year 2000, but it must be in the region of 5-7 million, approximately one-tenth of the whole population, and approaching that of Greater London.

Of course, it will not be evenly distributed from Margate to Aberystwyth and from Penzance to Aberdeen. Whole areas, towns and parts of towns across England will be occupied by different sections of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population.

As time goes on, the proportion of this total who are immigrant descendants, those born in England, who arrived here by exactly the same route as the rest of us, will rapidly increase. Already by 1985 the native-born would constitute the majority. It is this fact above all which creates the extreme urgency of action now, of just that kind of action which is hardest for politicians to take, action where the difficulties lie in the present but the evils to be prevented or minimized lie several parliaments ahead.

The natural and rational first question with a nation confronted by such a prospect is to ask: "How can its dimensions be reduced?" Granted it be not wholly preventable, can it be limited, bearing in mind that numbers are of the essence: the significance and consequences of an alien element introduced into a country or population are profoundly different according to whether that element is 1 per cent or 10 per cent.

The answers to the simple and rational question are equally simple and rational: by stopping or virtually stopping, further inflow, and by promoting the maximum outflow. Both answers are part of the official policy of the Conservative Party.

It almost passes belief that at this moment twenty or thirty additional immigrant children are arriving from overseas in Wolverhampton alone every week—and that means fifteen or twenty additional families of a decade or two hence. Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population.

It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.

So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancées whom they have never seen. Let no one suppose that the flow of dependants will automatically tail off. On the contrary, even at the present admission rate of only 5,000 a year by voucher, there is sufficient for a further 325,000 dependants per annum ad infinitum, without taking into account the huge reservoir of existing relations in this country—and I am making no allowance at all for fraudulent entry.

In these circumstances nothing will suffice but that the total inflow for settlement should be reduced at once to negligible proportions, and that the necessary legislative and administrative measures be taken without delay. I stress the words "for settlement". This has nothing to do with the entry of Commonwealth citizens, any more than of aliens, into this country, for the purposes of study or of improving their qualifications, like (for instance) the Commonwealth doctors who, to the advantage of their own countries, have enabled our hospital service to be expanded faster than would otherwise have been possible. These are not, and never have been, immigrants.

I turn to re-emigration. If all immigration ended tomorrow, the rate of growth of the immigrant and immigrant-descended population would be substantially reduced, but the prospective size of this element in the population would still leave the basic character of the national danger unaffected. This can only be tackled while a considerable proportion of the total still comprises persons who entered this country during the last ten years or so. Hence the urgency of implementing now the second element of the Conservative Party's policy: the encouragement of re-emigration.

Nobody can make an estimate of the numbers which, with generous grants and assistance, would choose either to return to their countries of origin or to go to other countries anxious to receive the manpower and the skills they represent. Nobody knows, because no such policy has yet been attempted. I can only say that, even at present, immigrants in my own constituency from time to time come to me, asking if I can find them assistance to return home. If such a policy were adopted and pursued with the determination which the gravity of the alternative justifies, the resultant outflow could appreciably alter the prospects for the future.

It can be no part of any policy that existing family should be kept divided; but there are two directions in which families can be reunited, and if our former and present immigration laws have brought about the division of families, albeit voluntary or semi-voluntarily, we ought to be prepared to arrange for them to be reunited in their countries of origin.

In short, suspension of immigration and encouragement of re-emigration hang together, logically and humanly, as two aspects of the same approach.

The third element of the Conservative Party's policy is that all who are in this country as citizens should be equal before the law and that there shall be no discrimination or difference made between them by public authority. As Mr. Heath has put it, we will have no "first-class citizens" and "second-class citizens".

This does not mean that the immigrant and his descendants should be elevated into a privileged or special class or that the citizen should be denied his right to discriminate in the management of his own affairs between one fellow citizen and another or that he should be subjected to inquisition as to his reasons and motives for behaving in one lawful manner rather than another.

There could be no grosser misconception of the realities than is entertained by those who vociferously demand legislation as they call it "against discrimination", whether they be leader-writers of the same kidney and sometimes on the same newspapers which year after year in the 1930s tried to blind this country to the rising peril which confronted it, or archbishops who live in palaces, faring delicately with the bedclothes pulled right over their heads. They have got it exactly and diametrically wrong. The discrimination and the deprivation, the sense of alarm and resentment, lies not with the immigrant population but with those among whom they have come and are still coming.

This is why to enact legislation of the kind before Parliament at this moment is to risk throwing a match on to the gunpowder. The kindest thing that can be said about those who propose and support it is they know not what they do.

Nothing is more misleading than comparison between the Commonwealth immigrant in Britain and the American Negro. The Negro population of the United states, which was already in existence before the United States became a nation, started literally as slaves and were later given the franchise and other rights of citizenship, to the exercise of which they have only gradually and still incompletely come. The Commonwealth immigrant came to Britain as a full citizen, to a country which knows no discrimination between one citizen and another, and he entered instantly into the possession of the rights of every citizen, from the vote to free treatment under the National Health Service. Whatever drawbacks attended the immigrants—and they were drawbacks which did not, and do not, make admission into Britain by hook or by crook appear less than desirable—arose not from the law or from public policy or from administration but from those personal circumstances and accidents which cause, and always will cause, the fortunes and experience of one man to be different for another's.

But while to the immigrant entry to this country was admission to privileges and opportunities eagerly sought, the impact upon the existing population was very different. For reasons which they could not comprehend, and in pursuance of a decision by default, on which they were never consulted, they found themselves made strangers in their own country. They found their wives unable to obtain hospital beds in childbirth, their children unable to obtain school places, their homes and neighbourhoods changed beyond recognition, their plans and prospects for the future defeated; at work they found that employers hesitated to apply to the immigrant worker the standards of discipline and competence required of the native-born worker; they began to hear, as time went by, more and more voices which told them that they were now the unwanted.

On top of this, they now learn that a one-way privilege is to be established by Act of Parliament: a law, which cannot, and is not intended, to operate to protect them or redress their grievances, is to be enacted to give the stranger, the disgruntled and the agent provocateur the power to pillory them for their private actions.

In the hundreds upon hundreds of letters I received when I last spoke on this subject two or three months ago, there was one striking feature which was largely new and which I find ominous. All Members of Parliament are used to the typical anonymous correspondent; but what surprised and alarmed me was the high proportion of ordinary, decent, sensible people, writing a rational and often well-educated letter, who believed that they had to omit their address because it was dangerous to have committed themselves to paper to a Member of Parliament agreeing with the views I had expressed, and that they would risk either penalties or reprisals if they were known to have done so.

The sense of being a persecuted minority which is growing among ordinary English people in the areas of the country which are affected is something that those without direct experience can hardly imagine.

I am going to allow just one of those hundreds of people to speak for me. She did give her name and address, which I have detached from the letter which I am about to read. She was writing from Northumberland about something which is happening at this moment in my own constituency:

Eight years ago in a respectable street in Wolverhampton a house was sold to a Negro. Now only one white (a woman old-age pensioner) lives there. This is her story. She lost her husband and both her sons in the war. So she turned her seven-roomed house, her only asset, into a boarding house. She worked hard and did well, paid off her mortgage and began to put something by for her old age. Then the immigrants moved in. With growing fear, she saw one house after another taken over. The quiet streets became a place of noise and confusion. Regretfully, her white tenants moved out.

The day after the last one left, she was awakened at 7 a.m. by two Negroes who wanted to use her phone to contact their employer. When she refused, as she would have refused any stranger at such an hour, she was abused and feared she would have been attacked but for the chain on her door. Immigrant families have tried to rent rooms in her house, but she always refused. Her little store of money went, and after paying her rates, she had less than £2 per week. She went to apply for a rate reduction and was seen by a young girl, who on hearing she had a seven-roomed house, suggested she should let part of it. When she said the only people she could get were Negroes, the girl said "racial prejudice won't get you anywhere in this country". So she went home.

The telephone is her lifeline. Her family pay the bill, and help her out as best they can. Immigrants have offered to buy her house—at a price which the prospective landlord would be able to recover from his tenants in weeks, or at most in a few months. She is becoming afraid to go out. Windows are broken. She finds excreta pushed through her letterbox. When she goes to the shops, she is followed by children, charming, wide-grinning piccaninnies. They cannot speak English, but one word they know. "Racialist", they chant. When the new Race Relations Bill is passed, this woman is convinced she will go to prison. And is she so wrong? I begin to wonder. [ note: The woman, a war widow, was named Druscilla Cotterill. See Widow in Enoch Powell's Rivers of Blood speech really did exist, By Fiona Barton, Daily Mail, February 2, 2007 ]

The other dangerous delusion from which those who are wilfully or otherwise blind to realities suffer, is summed up in the word "integration".

To be integrated into a population means to become for all practical purposes indistinguishable from its other members. Now, at all times, where there are marked physical differences, especially of colour, integration is difficult though, over a period, not impossible. There are among the Commonwealth immigrants have come to live here in the last fifteen years or so, many thousands whose wish and purpose is to be integrated and whose every thought and endeavour is bent in that direction. But to imagine that such a thing enters the heads of a great and growing majority of immigrants and their descendants is a ludicrous misconception, and a dangerous one to boot.

We are on the verge of here of a change. Hitherto it has been force of circumstance and of background which has rendered the very idea of integration inaccessible to the greater part of the immigrant population—that they never conceived or intended such a thing, and that their numbers and physical concentration meant the pressures towards integration which normally bear upon any small minority did not operate. Now we are seeing the growth of positive forces acting against integration, of vested interests in the preservation and sharpening of racial and religious differences, with a view to the exercise of actual domination, first over fellow immigrants and then over the rest of the population.

The cloud no bigger than a man's hand, that can so rapidly overcast the sky, has been visible recently in Wolverhampton and has shown signs of spreading quickly. The words I am about to use, verbatim as they appeared in the local press on 17 February, are not mine, but those of a Labour Member of Parliament who is a Minister in the present Government.

The Sikh communities' campaign to maintain customs inappropriate in Britain is much to be regretted. Working in Britain, particularly in the public services, they should be prepared to accept the terms and conditions of their employment. To claim special communal rights (or should one say rites?) leads to a dangerous fragmentation within society. This communalism is a canker: whether practised by one colour or another it is to be strongly condemned.

All credit to John Stonehouse for having had the insight to perceive that, and the courage to say it.

For these dangerous and divisive elements the legislation proposed in the Race Relations Bill is the very pabulum they need to flourish. Here is the means of showing that the immigrant communities can organize to consolidate their members, to agitate and campaign against their fellow citizens, and to overawe and dominate the rest with the legal weapons which the ignorant and the ill-informed have provided.

As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding. Like the Roman, I seem to see "the River Tiber foaming with much blood".

That tragic and intractable phenomenon which we watch with horror on the other side of the Atlantic but which there is interwoven with the history and existence of the States itself, is coming upon us here by our own volition and our own neglect.

Indeed, it has all but come. In numerical terms, it will be of American proportions long before the end of the century. Only resolute and urgent action will avert it even now.

Whether there will be the public will to demand and obtain that action, I do not know.

All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal."

The enemy is inside the gates.

Prepare for Civil War.

Don't forget to make those responsible for the disaster pay their fair share.


Tuesday, April 17, 2018


For the second day in a row, heavy riots between French police and muslim mobs in Le Mirail, a multicultural neighborhood in Toulouse, France.

The riots started a couple of days ago when Police ordered a woman to remove her niqab for identification. When she refused, Police tried to apprehend her and guide her to the local bureau. The bruhaha she made alerted the heavily muslim neighborhood and in the blink of an eye a mob formed, attacking the police. The riots escalated.

Yesterday François Desouche reported the following:

"Les premiers heurts ont éclaté dans le quartier de Bellefontaine ce lundi soir. Selon la police, des « tirs de mortier » ont été lancés depuis des appartements en coursive. Les policiers ont répliqué par des tirs de grenades et de bombes lacrymogènes. Une barricade est actuellement en flammes rue Paul Gauguin. Plusieurs voitures sont actuellement en flammes dans le quartier. "


"The first clashes occurred in the Bellefontaine quarter monday evening. According to the police, "mortar shots" were observed from apartment buildings. Police reacted by shooting grenades and launcing tear gas bombs. A barricade is in flames in the Rue Paul Gauguin. Several vehicles are burning in this quarter."

As things stand now, Tuesday 17 April at noon, there's talk of 25 vehicles set on fire and 18 arrests.

A taste of what is to come Europewide, courtesy the red and green traitors in our midst and their de facto allies in the traditional parties.


Monday, April 16, 2018


So Ronald Lee Ermey is dead. Pity. Like so many others this side of the Pond, I only got to know him by watching Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket. Here's the memorable opening scene...

... Hey, psssst!!! if you are a milennial, you can now crawl out of your safe space!!!!

* “You little piece of shit you look like a fucking worm.”

* “Looks to me the best part of you ran down the crack of your mama’s ass and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress!”

* “You are pukes—the lowest life form on earth. You are not even human fucking beings. You are only unorganized, grab-asstic pieces of amphibian shit!”

* “Did your parents have children that lived?”
“Sir, yes, sir.”
“I’ll bet they regret that. You’re so ugly you could be a modern art masterpiece.”

* “You had best unfuck yourself or I will unscrew your head and shit down your neck!”

* “Who said that? Who the fuck said that? Who’s the slimy little communist shit twinkle-toed cocksucker down here who just signed his own death warrant?”

* “I do not look down n*****s, k***s, wops or greasers. Here you are all equally worthless.”

* “I bet you’re the kind of guy would fuck a person in the ass and not have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around!”

* “Do you suck dicks?”
“Sir, no, sir.”
“Bullshit, I’ll bet you could suck a golf ball through a garden hose.”

* “Where in the hell are you from anyway, private?”
“Sir, Texas, sir!”
“Holy dog shit, Texas! Only steers and queers come from Texas, private Cowboy! And you don’t look much like a steer to me so that kinda narrows it down.”

* “How tall are you, Private?”
“Sir, five foot nine, sir.”
“I didn’t know they stacked shit that high!”


OK, anyway... RIP Gunnery Sergeant Hartman. God bless.



From the files of the Loony Bin Department:

Hat tip PI-News:

"Familie Mohamed geht’s gut. Idris Mohamed, angeblich Syrer und damit VIP-Gast der Kanzlerin, ist ein arbeitsloser ehemaliger Erntehelfer. Er residiert mit seiner nach Deutschland nachgeholten wohlgenährten Schariabraut und den (bisher) elf Kindern in einer schön renovierten Leipziger Innenstadtwohnung auf 220 Quadratmeter und kassiert monatlich rund 5.200 Euro aus deutschen Steuermitteln – zahlen für den Geburtendschihad."


"The Mohamed family is doing allright. Idris Mohamed, supposedly a Syrian and as such a VIP Guest of the Chancellor, is an unemployed former harvest helper. He resides with his well fed Sharia bride, after him whisked to Germany through family reunification laws, and his (until now) eleven children, in a beautifully renovated 220m2 apartment in the centre of Leipzig. Monthly he cashes in 5,200 EUR for free - courtesy the German taxpayer. Funds for the Birth Jihad."

Europe is DOOMED.


Sunday, April 15, 2018


An excellent article by Timothy Matthews, editor at the British Catholic Family News. Exerpt:

"This ‘School’ (designed to put flesh on their revolutionary programme) was started at the University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with school and institute were indistinguishable. In 1923 the Institute was officially established, and funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil was born in Argentina and at the age of nine was sent to attend school in Germany. He attended the universities in Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science. While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism. According to the intellectual historian Martin Jay, the topic of his dissertation was ‘the practical problems of implementing socialism.


Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist, although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer assumed control and he believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis of the Institute’s research. When Hitler came to power, the Institut was closed and its members, by various routes, fled to the United States and migrated to major US universities—Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse (denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which ‘opens the way for licence cloaked as liberty’), Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas - possibly the School’s most influential representative.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief - or even the hope of belief - that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judaeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their ‘quiet’ cultural revolution - but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future - the School recommended (among other things):

1. The creation of racism offences.

2. Continual change to create confusion

3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority

5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.

6. The promotion of excessive drinking

7. Emptying of churches

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits

10. Control and dumbing down of media

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children. 

• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls

• abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces 

• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’

Munzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term operation thus: ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.'

The School believed there were two types of revolution:
(a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

The Family

The School’s ‘Critical Theory’ preached that the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family - an idea directly linked to Engels’ Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy. Already Karl Marx had written, in the “Communist Manifesto”, about the radical notion of a ‘community of women’ and in The German Ideology of 1845, written disparagingly about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the basic tenets of the ‘Critical Theory’ : the necessity of breaking down the contemporary family. The Institute scholars preached that ‘Even a partial breakdown of parental authority in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.’

Following Karl Marx, the School stressed how the ‘authoritarian personality’ is a product of the patriarchal family—it was Marx who wrote so disparagingly about the idea of the family being the basic unit of society. All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse under the guise of ‘women’s liberation’ and by the New Left movement in the 1960s.

They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one. In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, one of their members, wrote in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family type of ‘natural society.’ Eric Fromm was also an active advocate of matriarchal theory. Masculinity and femininity, he claimed, were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought but were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.’ His dogma was the precedent for the radical feminist pronouncements that, today, appear in nearly every major newspaper and television programme.

The revolutionaries knew exactly what they wanted to do and how to do it. They have succeeded.


Lord Bertrand Russell joined with the Frankfurt School in their effort at mass social engineering and spilled the beans in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote: ‘Physiology and psychology afford fields for scientific technique which still await development.' The importance of mass psychology ‘has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education. The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray . When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”

Writing in 1992 in Fidelio Magazine, [The Frankfurt School and Political Correctness] Michael Minnicino observed how the heirs of Marcuse and Adorno now completely dominate the universities, ‘teaching their own students to replace reason with ‘Politically Correct’ ritual exercises. There are very few theoretical books on arts, letters, or language published today in the United States or Europe which do not openly acknowledge their debt to the Frankfurt School. The witchhunt on today’s campuses is merely the implementation of Marcuse’s concept of ‘repressive toleration’-‘tolerance for movements from the left, but intolerance for movements from the right’-enforced by the students of the Frankfurt School’. 


Dr. Timothy Leary gave us another glimpse into the mind of the Frankfurt School in his account of the work of the Harvard University Psychedelic Drug Project, ‘Flashback.' He quoted a conversation that he had with Aldous Huxley: “These brain drugs, mass produced in the laboratories, will bring about vast changes in society. This will happen with or without you or me. All we can do is spread the word. The obstacle to this evolution, Timothy, is the Bible’. Leary then went on: “We had run up against the Judeo-Christian commitment to one God, one religion, one reality, that has cursed Europe for centuries and America since our founding days. Drugs that open the mind to multiple realities inevitably lead to a polytheistic view of the universe. We sensed that the time for a new humanist religion based on intelligence, good-natured pluralism and scientific paganism had arrived.”

One of the directors of the Authoritarian Personality project, R. Nevitt Sanford, played a pivotal role in the usage of psychedelic drugs. In 1965, he wrote in a book issued by the publishing arm of the UK’s Tavistock Institute:‘The nation, seems to be fascinated by our 40,000 or so drug addicts who are seen as alarmingly wayward people who must be curbed at all costs by expensive police activity. Only an uneasy Puritanism could support the practice of focusing on the drug addicts (rather than our 5 million alcoholics) and treating them as a police problem instead of a medical one, while suppressing harmless drugs such as marijuana and peyote along with the dangerous ones.” The leading propagandists of today’s drug lobby base their argument for legalization on the same scientific quackery spelled out all those years ago by Dr. Sanford.

Such propagandists include the multi-billionaire atheist George Soros who chose, as one of his first domestic programs, to fund efforts to challenge the efficacy of America’s $37-billion-a-year war on drugs. The Soros-backed Lindesmith Center serves as a leading voice for Americans who want to decriminalize drug use. ‘Soros is the ‘Daddy Warbucks of drug legalization,’ claimed Joseph Califano Jr. of Columbia University’s National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse’ (The Nation, Sep 2, 1999). 

Music, Television and Popular Culture

Adorno was to become head of a ‘music studies’ unit, where in his Theory of Modern Music he promoted the prospect of unleashing atonal and other popular music as a weapon to destroy society, degenerate forms of music to promote mental illness. He said the US could be brought to its knees by the use of radio and television to promote a culture of pessimism and despair - by the late 1930s he (together with Horkheimer) had migrated to Hollywood. 
The expansion of violent video-games also well supported the School’s aims.


In his book The Closing of the American Mind, Alan Bloom observed how Marcuse appealed to university students in the sixties with a combination of Marx and Freud. In Eros and Civilization and One Dimensional Man Marcuse promised that the overcoming of capitalism and its false consciousness will result in a society where the greatest satisfactions are sexual. Rock music touches the same chord in the young. Free sexual expression, anarchism, mining of the irrational unconscious and giving it free rein are what they have in common.'

The Media

The modern media - not least Arthur ‘Punch’ Sulzberger Jnr., who took charge of the New York Times in 1992 - drew greatly on the Frankfurt School’s study The Authoritarian Personality. (New York: Harper, 1950). In his book Arrogance, (Warner Books, 1993) former CBS News reporter Bernard Goldberg noted of Sulzberger that he ‘still believes in all those old sixties notions about ‘liberation’ and ‘changing the world man’ . . . In fact, the Punch years have been a steady march down PC Boulevard, with a newsroom fiercely dedicated to every brand of diversity except the intellectual kind.'

In 1953 the Institute moved back to the University of Frankfurt. Adorno died in 1955 and Horkheimer in 1973. The Institute of Social Research continued, but what was known as the Frankfurt School did not. The ‘cultural Marxism’ that has since taken hold of our schools and universities - that ‘political correctness’, which has been destroying our family bonds, our religious tradition and our entire culture -sprang from the Frankfurt School.

It was these intellectual Marxists who, later, during the anti-Vietnam demonstrations, coined the phrase, ‘make love, not war’; it was these intellectuals who promoted the dialectic of ‘negative’ criticism; it was these theoreticians who dreamed of a utopia where their rules governed. It was their concept that led to the current fad for the rewriting of history, and to the vogue for ‘deconstruction’. Their mantras: ‘sexual differences are a contract; if it feels good, do it; do your own thing.'

In an address at the US Naval Academy in August 1999, Dr Gerald L. Atkinson, CDR USN (Ret), gave a background briefing on the Frankfurt School, reminding his audience that it was the ‘foot soldiers’ of the Frankfurt School who introduced the ‘sensitivity training’ techniques used in public schools over the past 30 years (and now employed by the US military to educate the troops about ‘sexual harassment’). During ‘sensitivity’ training teachers were told not to teach but to ‘facilitate.’ Classrooms became centres of self-examination where children talked about their own subjective feelings. This technique was designed to convince children they were the sole authority in their own lives.

Atkinson continued: ‘The Authoritarian personality,’ studied by the Frankfurt School in the 1940s and 1950s in America, prepared the way for the subsequent warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Herbert Marcuse and his band of social revolutionaries under the guise of ‘women’s liberation’ and the New Left movement in the 1960s. The evidence that psychological techniques for changing personality is intended to mean emasculation of the American male is provided by Abraham Maslow, founder of Third Force Humanist Psychology and a promoter of the psychotherapeutic classroom, who wrote that, ‘... the next step in personal evolution is a transcendence of both masculinity and femininity to general humanness.’


It certainly all makes sense.


Saturday, April 14, 2018


The last page of the Spring edition of a High School Quarterly bulletin, somewhere in Flanders. It informs on the recently deceased ("Overlijdens") and the newborns ("Geboorte").

I am a product of the old school system. Perhaps today, with that common core nonsense, it is possible to turn this very bad arithmetic into something positive. Alas, for a dinosaur like me minus twelve plus one still equals minus eleven.

Europe deliberately chooses to self-destruct.


Friday, April 13, 2018


Via PI-News. A mosque in Herford, Germany. Owned and operated by DITIB, an organization financed by the Turkish state. Children play around in uniforms:

"Türkische Fahnen, Kinder, zum Teil im Kindergartenalter in militärischer Kampfmontur, ausgerüstet mit Spielzeugwaffen paradieren unter Anweisung von islamisch verhüllten Müttern in der Herforder DITIB-Moschee. Es werden militärische Kommandos gerufen, die Nachwuchskämpfer imitieren gefallene Soldaten, zugedeckt mit einer türkischen Flagge. Im Hintergrund das offizielle Wahlkampf-Lied des türkischen Islamdespoten Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

So zu sehen auf einem Video und auf Bildern, die vor kurzem bei einer Veranstaltung in der Moschee aufgenommen und auf der Facebook-Seite der DITIB-Gemeinde Herford präsentiert wurden. Mittlerweile wurde das Video dort gelöscht.

Die Aufnahmen seien bei einer Festveranstaltung zum türkischen Feiertag am 18. März (Tag der Gefallenen) im Gedenken an den Sieg der osmanischen Armee über die Allianz aus dem Vereinigten Königreich und Frankreich in der Schlacht von Gallipolli im 1. Weltkrieg entstanden.

Die Bilder sorgten für einige Aufregung, was die DITIB-Taqiyyameister sofort zurückrudern ließ. Wie das Westfalenblatt berichtet erklärte DITIB-Vorstandsmitglied Necati Aydin unverzüglich, dass man von nichts gewusst habe, der DITIB-Vorstand nicht eingebunden gewesen sei.

Das für die Aufführung zuständige Gemeindemitglied sei kurzfristig erkrankt und die Planung von einer anderen Person vorgenommen worden. Deshalb sei auch die „übliche Qualitätskontrolle“ entfallen. Gleichzeitig sagt Aydin aber: „Wir haben völlig falsch eingeschätzt, wie diese Aufführung interpretiert werden kann“.

Also was nun? Nichts gewusst, oder nur überrascht von den Reaktionen, weil es eben in Deutschland eher nicht üblich war bislang kleine Kinder in Kampfuniformen zu stecken, mit Gewehren auszustatten und Kriegsszenarien einer grausamen, blutigen Schlacht nachspielen zu lassen? In der Türkei ist es an diesem Tag nämlich durchaus üblich auch kleine Kinder in Militäruniformen zu stecken..."


Turkish flags, children, partly toddlers, wearing military uniforms, equipped with toy guns, parade around following directions of mothers in islamic garb. Military commands are shouted, the child soldiers imitate fallen ones, covered with a Turkish flag. In the background the official campaign song of Turkish islamic despot Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The scenes come from a video and photographs, recently shot in a mosque in Herford and placed on its DITIB Facebook page. Since then, the video has been removed.

The video was shot on the occasion of the Turkish holiday of 18 March (Day of the Fallen), which commemmorates the victory of the osmanic army over the Franco-English alliance in the Battle of Gallipoli in the First World War.

The images were quite upsetting, leading the DITIB Taqqiya chairman to take gas back. As the Westphalia journal wrote, DITIB-Chairman Necati Aydin claimed to know nothing about it, and that the Herforder DITIB had not been told this event would take place.

The person normally responsible for childrens' events would have been sick for a short while and his place would have been taken by another person. As a result the normal 'Quality Control' failed. In the same breath however, Aydin adds "We have completely underestimated how one [Bio-Germans, MFBB] would interpret this."

So what is it? Either you knew nothing about it, or you were surprised by the reactions, while in Germany it is not done anymore to put small children in uniforms, give them guns, and have them re-enact bloody battles. In Turkey however, these days it seems all too normal to do just that...."

Germans, you will not be able again to say 'Wir haben es nicht gewusst'. This is happening RIGHT UNDER YOUR NOSES. A civil war is brewing.


Sunday, April 01, 2018


Today, April 1st 2018, the Royal Air Force celebrates its 100th birthday. Indeed, on April 1, 1918, the RAF was designated an independent force (independent of any other branch, that is) and as such it is now the world's oldest air force.

The RAF's most important operation was the Battle of Britain, in which the immortal Spitfire, designed by Reginald Mitchell, played a pivotal role:

There are many competitors for the RAF's next iconic aircraft but the Handley Page Victor is a noteworthy candidate:

Most beautiful plane imho? The Hawker Hunter:

For sheer muscle, no contest: the English Electric Lightning!


Saturday, March 31, 2018


DowneastBlog wishes its readers a Happy Easter!

Jesus Has Risen

1 After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb. 2 There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. 3 His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. 4 The guards were so afraid of him that they shook and became like dead men. 5 The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. 6 He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. 7 Then go quickly and tell his disciples: ‘He has risen from the dead and is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him.’ Now I have told you.” 8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”



All week long I have been wanting to write something about the twin murders of Lt. Col. Beltrame and Mireille Knoll but couldn't find the time. Mark Steyn does a better job:

"Colonel Beltrame took four bullets, and from his sick bed, in hospital at Carcassonne, was married to his fiancée Marielle. They had planned a June wedding, but could no longer wait. In the early hours of Saturday morning the French Interior Minister, Gérard Collomb, Tweeted:

Le lieutenant-colonel Arnaud Beltrame nous a quittés. Mort pour la patrie. Jamais la France n'oubliera son héroïsme, sa bravoure, son sacrifice.

"Lieutenant-Colonel Arnaud Beltrame has left us. He died for his country. France will never forget his heroism, his bravery, his sacrifice."

I wonder if that is true; I wonder if even M Collomb will remember his name in the years ahead. I was last in Carcassonne two years ago, heading south from Toulouse, a city that to me seemed lost, with soldiers ambling the allée Jean-Jaurès in four-man patrols with weapons drawn, as surly young Mohammedans made masturbatory gestures at them from passing cars. In the day, you can just about believe it's a French city, with pretty demoiselles bicycling bare-legged with the wind in their hair. With sundown, the post-French future comes creeping in. In the teeming warren of side streets north of the allée, every place - every grotty paved triangle at the intersection of the narrow one-way lanes - is surrendered to knots of young Arab and more occasionally African men. I sat at a cheap plastic table outside an unprepossessing patisserie in the Place Robert-Schuman "Père de l'Europe" - "father of Europe", by which they mean M Schuman was one of the founders of what's now the EU. But in Place Robert-Schuman at 8.30 on a Tuesday night there was not a single person M Schuman would have recognized as "European". Even more startling, the streets appeared to have been vacuumed of women, not just the pretty girls on the bicyclettes but all females. All that remained were the men - bored, restless, resentful.

Via Jewish Defence League:

Lt. Col. Beltrame was ritually slaughtered. His throat was slit, a fact the media conveniently forget to mention.

In contrast to Toulouse, Carcassonne an hour south is inspirational. The city is a magnificent, two-thousand-year-old hill fortress that's been fought over by Romans, Visigoths, Saracens, Charlemagne, Pepin le Bref, Albigensians, Papal legates, Simon de Montfort, the Black Prince, and a few others I may have forgotten. I was headed from Toulouse to Marseille and Nice, but I saw the town from the autoroute, remembered it from childhood, and stopped - because, as often in Europe these days, I felt as if the chance might not come again. So I revisited the frieze at the Narbonne gate of "Dame Carcas", a possibly mythical character from the days when it was a Muslim fortress under siege by Christians and, after a cunning if apocryphal ruse, milady Carcas rang the bells and thereby gave the town its name - "Carcas sonne".

Carcassonne was literally a breath of fresh air after Toulouse. But ask not for whom Carcas' bells toll: an ancient hill fortress doesn't work as well when the enemies are not without, but inside the gates, all jumbled up with your guys. And so it was that Moroccan-born Redouane Lakdim began his killing spree by hijacking a car in Carcassonne, injuring the driver, killing his passenger, dumping both bodies in the bushes, and running over a patrol of gendarmes. The authorities took the precaution of evacuating the outer town and ordering the walled city into "lockdown", as they didn't call it back in Charlemagne's day. But the Allahu Akbar loon was already en route to Trèbes, an outlying community of 5,000 people, where the Super U sits between a kebab house and the ancient farmland of what, until recently, we had assumed was eternal, enduring France.

For all he mourns the brave M Beltrame, Gérard Collomb and his colleagues will do nothing to reverse the suicidal immigration policies that lead to French citizens getting taking hostage in the supermarket. I am human enough to be moved by the story of Arnaud Beltrame's deathbed wedding. I am human enough to be moved by the story of the 85-year-old Parisienne who survived the Holocaust only to be stabbed eleven times and then set alight round about the exact same time Colonel Beltrame was being shot by M Lakdim. Back in 1942, the then young girl was one of many Paris Jews arrested by collaborationist French police in the "Vel d'Hiv" round-up and shipped to Auschwitz. In the habit of western politicians only saying sorry for things their predecessors did, President Macron recently apologized for Vel d'Hiv. Perhaps in seventy-five years, his successor will apologize for M Macron's own feebleness and passivity in the face of a new enemy. Or perhaps by then there will be, in any meaningful sense, no France.

I would like to know the murdered octogenarian's name, but the authorities and media have agreed to refer to her only as "Mireille K", weirdly diminishing and dehumanizing her even in death. [UPDATE: The victim's surname has now been given as Mme Knoll.] As I said, I am human enough to be moved by these stories, and would like to know and remember the names of all the victims of the insane decision to keep importing Islam into the heart of the west. But there are so many of them, and arithmetic ultimately overwhelms humanity. There will be more Arnaud Beltrames and "Mireille K"s, because there will be more Redouane Lakdims, because more and more arrive each day, because President Macron and M Collomb and their counterparts throughout Europe have decreed it must be so and can never change.

A video via The Daily Mail:

Yet there is other arithmetic that democratic societies wishing to remain democratic would be prudent not to disregard. A new EU-wide poll finds that seventy per cent of Europeans think the "rapid population growth of Muslims" is a somewhat or very serious threat to Europe. In France, it's 66 per cent - which, given the high percentage of Muslims already in France, suggests perhaps some three-quarters of ethnic French agree on the "seriousness" of the threat. What's the old saying - "Fifty million Frenchmen can't be wrong"? Sixty-six per cent of 67 million is 44,220,000 - and those 44 million Frenchmen are as wrong as wrong can be, at least as far as Europe's political class is concerned.

Also from that new poll: Fifty per cent of Europeans believe their children will live worse lives. In France, it's 62 per cent. Could these two statistics - the 66 per cent who regard Islam as a serious threat, and the 62 per cent who think the new generation will lead worse lives - possibly be connected? A society that truly wished to honor Arnaud Beltrame's sacrifice would at least permit honest discussion of the question, and of immigration policies that ensure only that the walls of Carcassonne and of the French state will crumble to nothing."

When, God forbid, it ever comes to that, no Frenchman or -woman will be able to say "On ne l'a pas su".


Thursday, March 29, 2018


It's hard to believe Belgium's 'prime' newspaper De Standaard still claims to bring objective and balanced news.

Today's main article on foreign policy matters dealt with Kim Jong Un's visit to the PRC:

"Kim Jong Un actually promises a Spring full of 'joy and hope', and as such claims a normal diplomatic role. However, the American hardliner John Bolton could spoil things.


It really stands there.



In North Korea's 'Arduous March', the period between 1994 and 1998, enormous swaths of the population suffered from famine. Certainly, devastating floods, and later extreme drought, contributed to the disaster. But the main culprit was first and foremost the Stalinist country's economic mismanagement. Estimates as to the number of those perishing from starvation vary wildly and run from about a quarter of a million to 3.5 million. The latter number is possibly a fabrication of the regime itself to spur the international community to come to their aid, but 2 million deaths is, tragically, an entirely possible death toll.

The regime today is not one iota better than twenty years ago, one might even argue au contraire, much worse, what with the nuclear threat now casting long shadows beyond NK's borders. A threat enabled by the then US government under Bill Clinton.

Let all that be no problem for our moral betters at De Standaard!!! Kim Jong Un, petty tyrant, murderer, hedonist, and cruel son of a bitch is a 'Statesman'. And John Bolton, bah, that's a 'hardliner'!

One of the many symptoms of one of many European pathologies on full display. God help us with a press corps like that.



OK, at least that's what Angela and Heiko would want you to believe.

The video shows a brawl between Culture Enrichers in the city of Duisburg, in the Ruhr area:

Via PI-News:

"Am Dienstag gegen 20 Uhr kam es einmal mehr zu einem Straßenkrieg zwischen zwei Gruppen neo-plus-deutscher Fachkräfte. In Duisburg-Hamborn am Altmarkt trugen insgesamt etwa 60 bis 80 Personen eine Auseinandersetzung in ihrer kulturell eigenen Art und Weise aus. Man ging mit Macheten, Eisenstangen, Teleskopschlagstöcken und Haushaltsutensilien, wie einem Staubsaugerrohr aufeinander los. Rund 100 Polizisten waren im Einsatz und wurden ebenso aggressiv angegangen – verbal und körperlich."


"On Tuesday around 8pm once again street fighting took place between two groups of neo-plus-German qualified craftsmen. In Duisburg-Hamborn on the Altmarkt between 60 and 80 persons solved some misunderstandings in a culturally appropriate manner. With machetes, iron bars, bats, kitchen utensils and even a vacuum cleaner's metal tube. Around 150 police officers were deployed and were themselves aggressively attacked - verbally and physically."

Danke, Frau Merkel, danke!

If you import the Third World, you become the Third World.


Monday, March 26, 2018


Our buddies at Gates of Vienna have another telling video up with the testimony of Susanne Wiesinger, a Viennese middle school teacher:

This is the transcript:

00:00 You can notice the day’s struggle by Susanne Wiesinger, and also the relief.
00:05 She became very popular with other teachers for her honest words concerning
00:08 the growing influence of Islam in Vienna schools. —All of them were very emotional
00:11 and very happy. Some also said:
00:20 “It’s a shame I don’t dare do that.” They would also like to say it.
00:25 but they don’t dare, for all possible reasons.
00:35 This was the biggest mistake that we made,
00:40 that we completely entrusted a failed integration to the FPÖ [Freedom Party, right-wing].
00:45 And I also understood from talks today
00:50 that we don’t really SEE what mistakes we made.
00:55 Because we are too much invested in party politics.
01:00 I hope
01:05 that one day we’ll have more courage, and that we lose our vanity.
01:10 While the School Authority would like to leave the uncomfortable subject behind
01:14 as soon as possible, the 53-year-old teacher hopes that
01:18 from now on the problems of Muslim students will be
01:21 discussed often and tackled seriously. The silence has to end at last.
01:26 I believe the most important thing is to take it out of the media as soon as possible.
01:31 I’m under the impression, a very strong impression, that all will be well now.
01:36 And that I don’t have to speak out anymore.
01:41 It’s better if others take over,
01:46 or that I should remove myself from the line of fire.
01:49 Before her going public there was supposed to be
01:56 a discussion with Vienna State School Councilor Heinrich Himmer.
02:01 However, Susanne Wiesinger doesn’t believe that it will ever happen,
02:04 even though right now there’s a great need for talking.

The lady is rather optimistic as to the chances that this matter will from now on be discussed more openly. More at "IN A CLASS OF 25 CHILDREN, 21 MUST BE INTEGRATED."

"Eine Lehrerin aus Wien berichtet über große Probleme mit muslimischen Schülern. Diese interessierten sich mehr für ihren Glauben als für den Unterricht. Die Wiener Schulbehörde widerspricht der Frau aus der sozialdemokratischen Lehrergewerkschaft."


"A teacher from Vienna reports on huge problems with muslim pupils. These are more interested in their faith than in the courses taught. The director and staff of the school in question deny what the teacher, a member of a social democrat teacher's union, is saying."

Of course they do, the coward dhimmis.

If, God forbid, this insanity ever metastizes in its final gory endpoint, the Austrians won't be able to say 'Wir haben es nicht gewusst.'


Saturday, March 24, 2018


First Aid Kit with Blue. From the album The Lion's Roar (2012).

Swedish folk band around the sisters Klara (vocals/guitar) and Johanna Söderberg (vocals/keyboards/Autoharp/bass guitar).

Dire Straits with Private Investigations. Album Love over Gold (1982).

British rock band, formed in London in 1977 around the Knopfler brothers. When I was a student, they were in their prime. Here I go again, all sentimental.

Goede nacht.



Oh Brave New World of multiculti enrichment thanks to those who know what's best for us! Via François Desouche:

"Souvenons-nous des meurtres cruels de ces derniers mois. À Kandel, un jeune homme a poignardé son amie de 15 ans dans une pharmacie jusqu’à ce qu’elle saigne à mort. À Berlin, Keira, 14 ans, a été assassinée par son camarade de classe chez elle de 20 coups de poignard. Quelques jours plus tard, Mireille a été tuée à Flensburg avec un couteau, par son petit-ami Afghan.

D’où vient l’augmentation des attaques au couteau en si peu de temps? Apparemment, la possession de couteaux est une nouvelle tendance.

Le journal « Bild » a publié des chiffres effrayants. À Leipzig, les attaques au couteau ont augmenté de 300 pour cent. Il y avait 33 cas connus en 2011, 138 en 2017. A Berlin, il y a en moyenne sept agressions au couteau par jour. Parmi les auteurs, de nombreux adolescents et même des enfants.

La Rhénanie du Nord-Westphalie a également dû faire face à plus de 500 attaques au couteau au cours des six derniers mois...

"Let's recall the cruel murders of the last few months. In Kandel, a young lad knifed his 15 year old girlfriend in a pharmacy until she bled to death. In Berlin, Keira, 14 years old, was assassinated at home by her classmate with 20 stabbings. A few days later, Mireille was killed in Flensburg with a knife, by her Afghan boyfriend.

Where does the sudden increase in knife attacks come from? Apparently, knife possession is a novel tendency.

"Bild" newspaper has published terrifying stats. In Leipzig, knife attacks are up 300 per cent. In 2011, there were 33 cases, 138 in 2017. In Berlin, there's on average 7 stabbings a day. According to the authors, often by adolescents and even children.

In Nordrhein-Westphalen, over the past six months alone there were 500 knife attacks..."

Here is the Bild article.

If you import the Third World, you become the Third World.