Saturday, October 27, 2007

IF EUROPE IS TO SURVIVE, IT WILL HAVE TO DEPORT ALL MUSLIMS. REPEAT. ALL OF THEM.

Actually, I don't like it. I don't like writing stuff like further up. For one thing, there's things out there that in se are way more interesting. The Boeing-Airbus controversy e.g., and why imho Airbus made the right decision to build the A380. The Large Hadron Collider currently being built near Geneva, and the Quest for the "God-Particle". The Polish elections, which were a win-win contest for the Polish Right either way. The bankruptcy of the European Welfare State. Why calling the Nazis "Extreme Right" is the Biggest Political Lie of all time. The woes of Galileo, Europes answer to the US's GPS system. Plus a host of other things.

But I keep coming back to what is rapidly becoming an existential theme.

I'm sorry if I'm boring you, but I can't shut up.

_________________________________



A.) WEEKLONG RIOTS IN AMSTERDAM.

On Sunday, October 14, Bilal Bajaka, a Dutch youth of Moroccan descent, or shall we rather say a Moroccan living off Dutch Social Security, stepped into a police station in Slotervaart, one of Amsterdam's western neighborhoods, and randomly started stabbing the police officers present. One policeman received five stabs (one of them deep in the throat hitting the wind pipe) as well as several cuts in face and shoulders. An artery in his head was hit. His colleague, a female sergeant, was little better off, being stabbed in the chest and the back. A pulmonary artery was cut and a lung perforated. Yet she somehow managed to pull her weapon and shoot the scumbag dead. The parents of Mr. Bajaka complained that their son had been released too early from the mental institution he was in. They were visited the day after by Slotervaart Mayor Ahmed Marcouch, who offered his condolences (there was no report from a visit to the severely wounded police officers, then still fighting for their lives). Bilal Bajaka was the brother of one Abdullah Bajaka, who two years ago was arrested for planning to blow up an El Al Boeing at Schiphol Airport. And in 2003, when in jail (Bajaka first started to appear in police records in 1998, when he was, uh, thirteen), he was visited there by Mohammed Bouyeri, the murderer of Theo Van Gogh. Of course, all this must be coincidence.


Not one day later police first reported growing tensions among the local "youths" and then stones thrown through the windows. It appeares the largely moroccan neighborhood did not appreciate the shooting of a criminal from among their own, and especially not by an infidel chick. Monday, October 17, all hell broke loose. Over the course of one week, tens of cars were torched, media crews who were filming the events attacked, and the indigenous population, I assume a minority in Slotervaart, terrorized. In a perverse act of symbolism, a funeral service for Bajaka was held in a mosque in the immediate vicinity of the police station which was attacked (Dutch blog Klein Verzet reports it was the same mosque he visited before he went into the police station). Throughout the week the Dutch police presented a baffling show of inactivity, not intervening and hardly making any arrests even when cars were put on fire literally under their noses. It's not that the officers themselves did not want to act, they were ordered not to do anything, and the Amsterdam Police Chief, Bernard Welten, even officially announced this so-called De-escalation Policy on Dutch TV. Welten literally said that he wanted to avoid a Parisian scenario and that it was therefore necessary to "keep the peace at all cost." In this he was supported firmly by Amsterdam Mayor Job Cohen, who, when a Dutch Police Union asked for at least a ban on demonstrations, replied that that was unnecessary. Job Cohen is a prominent member of the PvdA, one of the Dutch Socialist parties.


By Tuesday, fire crews had to be escorted by police. All through the week and the week thereafter, cars were set alight by rampaging moroccan youths, with the unrest spreading to the adjacent neigborhoods of Osdorp and Geuzenveld-Slotermeer. Finally, by Friday, October 27, things seemed to come to a rest at last, with "only" two cars burned the previous night. Now, while the vandalims of Amsterdam's muslim scum got a fair deal of attention, mostly thanks to blogs, similar events in another major Dutch city, Den Haag (The Hague) went almost unnoticed. A most disturbing story came from Dutch daily De Telegraaf, which wrote that indigenous inhabitants of the Transvaal and Schilderswijk neighborhoods dare not report their torched cars and damage done to their property to the police for fear of reprisals from the moroccan perpetrators. Yes, it has come so far.

Three cars set alight in Bolestein-Buitenveldert neighborhood, Amsterdam - photo AT5


B.) WEEKLONG RIOTS IN BRUSSELS.

Sorry, too sick of it all to write any further. Big photo from Elaib Harvey, TBJ editor. Little one from a Belgian newspaper. In Brussels, the perpetrators are Turkish youths. On Sunday night they busted an Armenian cafe because they were fed up with reports from PKK rebels killing Turkish troops. Apparently the Turks thought that their cause - their indignation over Kurshish muslim rebels killing regular Turkish Army conscripts - was furthered by smashing to smithereens a cafe owned by a Christian. Anyway, police was in the neighborhood but did nothing. They were more active in September, when they beat up Vlaams Belang members peacefully protesting the islamization of Europe. The incident at the cafe marked the start of a weeklong period of car burning, rock throwing, and shop busting. Filthy dogs, all of them. Biting the hand that feeds them.





More details tomorrow. Check for updates.

This can't go on. The cancer of islam must be eradicated.


MFBB.



UPDATE: CHARLES JOHNSON IS MAKING A BIG MISTAKE.

Over the past few days, there have been a disturbing series of allegations that the Vlaams Belang is a neonazi party. Videos have been sent - reportedly by an extreme leftwing Belgian blogger (Yelloman) to LGF's Charles Johnson and he seems to have been lured into believing the crap.

Please, for God's sake. Someone email Johnson. I have NEVER denied that the origins of the Vlaams Belang/Vlaams Blok were murky. There's even several posts in this blog which explain that in detail. But you got it all to see from a Flemish perspective. Throughout Belgian history, EVEN TILL TODAY, Flemings have been treated like second rate citizens. EVEN TODAY, Flemings must put up thousands of more votes to get an MP elected to the federal parliament compared to the number of votes it takes for the French-speaking Walloons to elect an MP of their own. EVEN TODAY, the number of Flemish ministers in the federal government is equal to the number of Walloon ministers, even though the ratio of Flemings to Walloons is 6 to 4. You MUST understand that in the past, unfortunately, SOME Flemings sided with the Germans who falsely promised them greater self-rule. I have NEVER denied that when the Vlaams Blok was raised in 1977 to fight for legitimate Flemish rights, a number of people who had collaborated with the Nazis were there too. And I would never have joined the VB in that time. But anno 2007 the VB, in the meantime the Vlaams Belang, has become a modern party with an agenda that is as close to the GOP's agenda as any European party can get. THAT IS MY HONEST OPINION.

We over here in Europe NEED parties like Vlaams Belang. We are facing a mortal threat in the form of islamization and inside Belgium, the VB is the only political power seriously addressing the issue. Who cares when Filip Dewinter was a hothead in his student years? Btw, I have NEVER seen him sporting a swastika. Jesus Christ, compared to Ann Coulter Filip Dewinter is a schoolboy. It was The Netherland's Geert Wilders who called for banning the Koran, not Dewinter: HE defended publication of that terrible book. Who cares about a few godforsaken lapsuses? WHO GIVES A FUCK ABOUT A CELTIC CROSS ON HIS BOOKSHELF??? I like the Celtic Cross myself, and I am by no means someone who looks down upon people of other colour! We come from the Celts!

Please, tell Charles Johnson he is making a GRAVE MISTAKE by smearing the VB. In a time like this, WE NEED TO BE ALLIES, NOT ENEMIES. He's being bombarded now with futile reports and dubious photos from leftists.... and he's stepping into the trap. Let me show you another Filip Dewinter:



VB strongman Filip Dewinter shaking hands with rabbi Pinchas Meyers. TELL CHARLES JOHNSON THE VB IS PROTECTING BELGIUM'S JEWS!!!!

In March 2004, Filip Dewinter held in a meeting organized by the Antwerp VB chapter a passionate plea for the State of Israel, saying that "Israel is the vanguard of the West in a feudal Middle East". Among those present was Avi Lipkin, a jewish author and former spokesman for the Israeli Army. Dewinter's speech was so eloquent and convincing, highlighting Israels brave struggle and its prodigious accomplishments, that after the speech Mr. Lipkin HEARTILY EMBRACED FILIP DEWINTER!!!

CHARLES JOHNSON, DOES THIS GUY SOUND LIKE YOUR TYPICAL NEO-NAZI TO YOU??????

Please, let someone tell Mr. Johnson that he is wrong with his misgivings. I emailed him, but I fear he didn't notice. I'm not "pulling", I do not do this for attention. I am just a very concerned citizen - I am not telling you one hundredth of what happens here - and I fear for the future of my children in an islamized Europe.

I DO NOT WANT MY CHILDREN TO LIVE IN AN ISLAMIZED EUROPE. IN BELGIUM, THE VLAAMS BELANG IS OF PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE TO SAFEGUARD OUR LIBERTIES AND STAND UP FOR OUR VALUES. IT MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL THAT LGF AND JOHNSON, OF ALL PEOPLE, SHOULD COME TO DENOUNCE US. WE ARE IN THIS TOGETHER. WE CANNOT AFFORD DIVISION.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

BAD NEWS FROM IRAQ.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! THOSE POOR IRAQI CEMETERY WORKERS!!!!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

From Yahoo!News:


AS VIOLENCE FALLS IN IRAQ, CEMETERY WORKERS FEEL THE PINCH

By Jay Price and Qasim Zein, McClatchy Newspapers
Tue Oct 16, 2:40 PM ET

NAJAF, Iraq — At what's believed to be the world's largest cemetery, where Shiite Muslims aspire to be buried and millions already have been, business isn't good.

A drop in violence around Iraq has cut burials in the huge Wadi al Salam cemetery here by at least one-third in the past six months, and that's cut the pay of thousands of workers who make their living digging graves, washing corpses or selling burial shrouds....

...Dhurgham Majed al Malik, 48, whose family has arranged burial services for generations, said that this spring, private cars and taxis with caskets lashed to their roofs arrived at a rate of 6,500 a month. Now it's 4,000 or less, he said... The burials aren't expensive, usually $200 or less, but many people draw their income from them....


That @/?##ç0§ç!è#&!!!!!! BUSH!!! BUSH IS THE CRIMINAL!!!!!

Hat tip Blackfive. Jesus Christ.


MFBB.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

COUNTERJIHAD BRUSSELS 2007.

Statue of Godfrey of Bouillon on horseback, BrusselsBetter late than never. Last Thursday and Friday, October 18 and 19, more than 70 organizations and personalities gathered in both the European Parliament and the Flemish Parliament to signal the start of a European network to resist the increasing Islamization of most European countries. Actually, I was amazed that such meetings could be held in the EP and the Flemish Parliament altogether, given the still overwhelming footprint of politically correct politicians in both Halls of Power. I strongly suspect that Vlaams Belang parliamentarians from both the EP and the FP somehow managed to have the tribunes available for what turned out to be an impressive cast. Indeed, speakers included Bat Ye’or, author of Eurabia and Dhimmitude and Jihadwatch's Robert Spencer, author of Religion of Peace? Why Christianity is and Islam Isn’t, and Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, Director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity and a former muslim. Furthermore David Littman, UN Human Rights expert, MK (Member of Knesset) Dr. Arieh Eldad, leader of the new Israeli political movement Hatikvah (hope), Sam Solomon, Director of the Fellowship of Faith for Muslims and author of the Charter of Muslim Understanding, Dr. Marc Cogen from Ghent University, Dr. Andrew Bostom, author of The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism, and many more.

If you check out blogs dealing with the subject you will find that several use this photo, which I find a somewhat unfortunate choice. It's an aerial shot from between the two spires of the Koekelberg Basilica, or National Basilica of the Holy Heart (magnificent photo here), one of the world's greatest churches, designed by architect Albert Van Huffel in Art Deco style and built between 1905 and 1970 (!). The blog photo superimposes two islamic crescents on the spires as well as one at what appears to be the end of the Leopold II boulevard. I'm sorry, but imho my choice for an illustration is a better fitting one, see above. The statue on Brussels' Royal Square of Godfrey of Bouillon, the "Belgian" crusader, born around 1060 in Baisy-Thy near Brussels, who together with Bohemund of Normandy , Raymond of Toulouse and Robrecht of Flanders answered Pope Urban II's call to wrestle Jerusalem from Islamic control and set out on the First Crusade in 1096. I am sorry to say that the taking of Jerusalem in 1099 was accompanied by widespread looting, burning and murder (it is said all muslims inside the city walls were killed, including women and children), in which, luckily, Godfrey seems to have taken no part. After several other prominent crusaders refused the title of King of Jerusalem, Godfrey of Bouillon was the logical choice, but while he indeed accepted responsibility, he refused to be named King himself, asking to be called only Defender of the Holy Sepulchre.

Enough about history now, on both meetings anti-islamization experts and activists from fourteen European countries offered reports on the current state of Islamisation and jihadism in their respective nations, as well as on attempts to mount a defense of our Christian-inspired values and hard-fought for constitutional liberties; they were:

from Austria: Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff
from Belgium: Filip Dewinter
from the Czech Republic: Matyas Zmo
from Denmark: Lars Hedegaard
from Finland: not disclosed publicly
from France: Nidra Poller
from Germany: Stefan Herre
from Italy: Adriana Bolchini Gaigher
from The Netherlands: Dr. Johannes J.G. Jansen
from Norway: Jens Anfindsen
from Romania: Traian Ungureanu
from Sweden: Ted Ekeroth
from Switzerland: Dr. Arnaud Dotezac
from the United Kingdom: Gerard Batten

Other activists represented Canada, Israel and the United States. I would wager that one of the most impressive US participants was Pamela Geller, from Atlas Shrugs. I hope that she won't hold it against me that I use a photo of her together with Dr. Arieh Eldad, who was for 25 years Chief of the IDF's Medical Corps:

Atlas Shrugs' Pamela Geller and Dr. Eldad

She has an outstanding, very elaborate post on the Counterjihad Conference (which on October 18 went through in the European Parliament and the day after in the Flemish Parliament), provides videos and text fragments and cites many speakers, such as Mrs. Adriana Bolchini Gaiger, Lega Nord politician and organiser of 9/11 commemmoration rallies. Mrs. Gaigher:

Muslims are demanding seperate beaches and restricted use of swimming pools and calls to consider Friday the festive day for Muslims (where it is not even in practice in Islamic countries.) Further demands are being made for 5 pauses for prayer during study and work times which interrupts the rhythms of all other workers and damages the freedom of study and work for the Italian population at large.

Reports of maltreatment of women dominate the newspaper crime reports. These are the ones that come to the attention of the public, but we know the tragedy of Muslim women segregated at home and subjected to ill treatment is so very widespread. Their Calvary begins when they arrive in Italy. They are isolated from the indigenous population are not sent to school, do not learn the language and therefore they cannot communicate with us and cannot ask for assisitance. Not that they would. Terrified to I am sure.

New and hurried construction of mosques has become an emergency, they excpect them as an urgent need and there is not one Italian city that is not affected by this problem. They are not simply mosques but Islamic citadels, catering to their needs from birth to death seperating them from the Italians. The main problem is that these Centers are under the influence of UCLII (unione delle Communita' e Organization Islamiche in Italia) whose President and former secretary Robberto Piccado was investigated for "incitement to to ethni and religious hatred" and "apologism for terrorism". Charges levelled by two paliamentarians.

These meetings are hopefully the start of a Europeanwide awareness of the grave dangers that islamification poses to Europe, not only to its values and liberties, but ultimately also to its cultural and historical heritage as well as its economic and scientific progress. With regards to the latter, the threat posed to them by Islamification may well constitute the most convincing impetus for Europe to stop its pandering to this heinous, alien politico-religious ideology. It may - again - not be the most politically correct thing to say, but throughout Europe we can clearly see that the muslim communities in our midst do not, repeat NOT, provide us with skilled labour and bright scientists. If the demographic trends continue, who then will man Europes factories and laboratories come the year 2050?

I can imagine that leftozoid whackos can live with churches converted into mosques, beheaded 16th-century statues and Botticelli's The Birth of Venus painted over or burnt - because that is the fate of that work if one bad day a muslim becomes Director of Florence's Uffizi Gallery. After all, all cultures are equal except ours which is actually inferior, and those Bamiyan Buddhas were crumbling anyway. But will they accept that our industry crumbles down, not longer producing swell cars and high-tech gizmos? I doubt it.

More info over at the Conference website Counterjihad Europa.

And oh yeah, if you think MFBB is, how do you call that, jumping the shark(?), check out Amsterdam's Intifada. Multiculturalism is dead.


MFBB.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

TURKISH MUSLIM BASTARDS, CONFESS YOUR HORRIBLE CRIME

On Wednesday evening, October 9, the US House Foreign Affairs Committee passed a resolution condemning the murder of an estimated 1.3 million Christian Armenians by the Ottoman Empire during World War I as a genocide.

Turkish President Abdullah Gul denounced the passing of that resolution as unacceptable:


"This unacceptable decision of the committee ... has no validity and respectability for the Turkish people,..." and "... Unfortunately some politicians in the United States of America have closed their ears to calls to be reasonable and once again sought to sacrifice big problems for small domestic political games."


FUCK YOU Abdullah Gul!!! "No respectability for the Turkish people..." Hell yeah, I suppose it's those famous muslim "sensitivities" again. Talking about sensitivities, look at that boy - just look at him - collapsed on a doorstep in 1915 or 1916 in Syria, then still part of the Ottoman Empire. He was just a minor member of the Ottoman Empire's christian minority of roughly 2 million Armenians. He became a victim of a horrible campaign of deportation, mass murder, deliberate starving, poisoning, drowning and even burning alive. Look at that boy, at his skull-like head, his pitiful remnants of limbs, his dull hair, his ribs poking through parchment skin. Can you imagine the agony this young innocent human being must have gone through before finally dying? I don't want to imagine it. Now multiply that suffering by 1.5 million or so. And you have the Armenian Genocide.


Enver PashaThe Armenian Genocide did not fall out of the sky. At the outbreak of World War I the Ottoman Empire was not really the backward sultanate anymore as it was commonly perceived in the rest of the world. Indeed, in 1908-1909 a group of young officers like Enver Pasha and intellectuals like Ziya Gokalp (to become Kemal Ataturks ideologue) had become the dominant power in Ottoman politics - that is where the term "Young Turks" comes from. Their movement, intent on modernising the sultanate, was called the CUP, the Committee for Unity and Progress. But long before them, the Christian Armenians had already been subject to persecution and even mass killings. As non-muslims their testimony under Sharia Law was inadmissible against muslims, and they had to pay higher taxes - even apart from the jizya, the exemption tax for dhimmis - than muslims. That jizya paid them little protection. In the late 19th Century, the Porte regularly sent undisciplined Kurdish troops against Armenian villages, with an estimated 37,000 dead as a result. However, some sources claim that in these so-called Hamidian Massacres (after the then sultan, Abdul Hamid II), as many as 350,000 perished! And in 1909, the year of the Young Turks, there was the Adana Massacre, which claimed another 30,000 Armenian lives.

As it happened though, those early killing would pale in significance to what was to come. The start of World War I did not go well for the Ottoman Empire, and a scapegoat for disastrous defeats on the battlefield was quickly found: the Armenians, quickly viewed as subversive elements (pre-war territorial losses to Austria-Hungary, Serbia and Bulgaria had already angered the Young Turks against religious and ethnic minorities). Already in 1914, Armenian soldiers in Turkish service were singled out and shot, and Armenian public servants were ousted from the administration. In late 1914, the so-called Special Organization (Teshkilati Mahsusa) was raised from deliberately released criminals, and supplied with explosives and rifles to start a terror campaign among ordinary Armenian citizens. Then there was the Battle of Sarikamish, fought in winter 1914-1915 in the Armenian homeland itself, in which the Turkish 3rd Army suffered disastrous losses against the Russians. The 3rd Army's commander was... Enver Pasha, and to minimize his own role in the disaster, he accused local Armenians of collaborating with the Russians (this was true to some extent, but the real reason for the defeat was Pasha's incompetence in tactical matters and logistics - as many troops froze to death as were killed by Russian bullets).

Although Pasha was largely blamed for Sarikamish - he never again held a military field command in the Ottoman Empire - the seeds had been sown. On April 24, 1915, 250-300 Armenian intellectuals were rounded up in Constantinople, deported and killed. The same fate befell 5,000 Armenian citizens who were butchered in the streets. By the end of the month, an estimated 50,000 (!) Armenians had already been killed in the Van province alone. A desperate appeal by Armenian organizations to the German Ambassador in Constaninople for formal German protection was rejected by Berlin in order to... not offend the Ottoman government (the famous muslim sensitivities again). In May, Mehmed Talat Pasha , the Minister of the Interior, asked the Ottoman government and the Grand Vizier to legalize mass-scale deportation of all Armenians from Anatolia (central Turkey). On 29 May 1915, the CUP's Central Committee passed the Temporary Deportation Law (Tehcir Law), enabling the government and the army to deport any Armeninan who was deemed a threat to national security. Given the vicious propaganda campaign depicting ALL Armenians as fifth columnists, the laws "legalized" nothing less than wholesale ethnic cleansing. A couple of months later, the Temporary Law of Expropriation and Confiscation was passed, "legalizing" the taking by muslims of all Armenian property including land, livestock and homes. Many if not most of the Ottoman's Empire wealthier classes and industrialists were Armenians (as well as Greeks, those had something coming too), thus the passing of this "law" meant a gigantic financial bonus for the Ottoman treasury (it is a common phenomenon in Muslim countries that the wealth of the nation is often provided by hardworking minorities of other faiths). In the summer of 1915 the mass deportation scheme was fully implemented. First able-bodied male Armenians were drafted for forced labor. Either they had to work themselves to death, or they were murdered outright. Then the women, children and elderly were told to take what they could carry and put on forced marches to "relocate" to the Syrian desert, Der Zor, "escorted" by Ottoman gendarmerie.

As it was, during the first nine months of 1915 alone, an estimated 1 million Armenians perished (the killings had already been going on on a "small" scale before April 1915, and as we have seen even in 1914). Of those 1 million, some 600,000 were downright massacred while another 400,000 succumbed to starvation, dehydration and rape on the death marches south. A detailed account of the events, well documented by a multitude of European diplomats as well as German officers, reads like a horror show (note that during World War I, Germany and Turkey were allies and the German military presence in Turkey in the form of instructors and advisers was considerable). From the site Genocide1915.info:

...

6/23/1915: The wholesale arrest of 1,500 men is carried out in Sivas Province.
6/23/1915: First large-scale massacre of Armenian men is carried out in the town of Kharput.
6/23/1915: Wholesale arrests are made in Bitlis of the scattered remnant Armenians who had escaped the previous series of massacres.
6/23/1915: Massacres of Armenian Christians, Maronites, Nestorians, Europeans, Catholics, and other non-Muslim people in the city of Mardin are carried out under the direct order of Dr. Reshid, the governor-general of Diyarbekir Province.
6/23/1915: The Armenian notables of Trebizond are sent by boat toward Samsun, and on the way are thrown, tightly bound together, into the Black Sea.
6/25/1915: The massacre of Armenians of Bitlis is carried out under the direct orders of Mustafa Abdulhalik Renda.
6/25/1915: A government decree instructs the 30,000 Armenians in Trebizond to leave the city within 5 days.
6/26/1915: A decree issued in Erzerum orders all Armenians to leave for Syria.
6/26/1915: A decree issued in Samsun orders all Armenians to leave within 15 days.
6/26/1915: The remaining Armenian men in Sivas are arrested.
6/28/1915: The previously arrested Armenian educators and community leaders in Kharput are transported from prison to be murdered.
6/29/1915: Vartkes and Zohrab, two Armenian deputies in the Ottoman Parliament, deported from Constantinople, arrive in custody in Aleppo.
6/30/1915: 3,000 Armenians from the city of Erzerum are murdered while being deported.
6/30/1915: 6,000 Armenians from Zeitun arrive in the Konia Desert and nearby malarial marshes.
7/1/1915: 2,000 Armenian soldiers in the Turkish Army used as laborers are massacred near the city of Kharput.
7/1/1915: The first convoy of deportees leaves the seaport of Trebizond for the south.
7/1/1915: The governor-general of Sivas announces that the first convoy of deportees from the city are to leave by July 5 in groups according to street residence. A total of 48,000 persons are deported. The governor, commissioner of police, two parliamentary deputies, the qadi (the chief religious judge), and the mufti (the religious chief) tell the Armenians that they were being resettled for the duration of the war in order to forestall any resistance.
7/2/1915: Bands of 4,000 chetes operating out of the mountains around Erzinjan begin daily raids against the southward bound convoys of Armenian deportees.
7/2/1915: The deportation decree is issued in the city of Mush.
7/4/1915: For the record an official German protest is registered with the Grand Vizier. The protest is left unanswered by the Turkish government.
7/4/1915: Neshed Pasha leaves Sivas with three regiments and artillery to subdue the Armenians resisting in Shabin-Karahisar.
7/5/1915: In Diyarbekir 2,000 Armenian soldiers working in labor corps are killed.
7/5/1915: The first convoy of deportees leaves the city of Sivas. Every day for 16 days an average of 400 families leave, the overwhelming majority being slain on route to the Syrian Desert. The last convoy departs from the city on July 20.
7/6/1915: By this date up to 1,000 Armenian families had left Trebizond in convoys headed south.
7/7/1915: The male members of 800 Armenian families in the town of Kharput are killed.
7/8/1915: Zaven, Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople, appeals to the Minister of Justice, Ibrahim Bey, who replies that he cannot intervene in matters concerning the War Ministry.
7/10/1915: 2,700 persons are killed in a second massacre in Mardin.
7/11/1915: The beginning of a four-day massacre in Mush under the combined orders of parliamentary deputy Elias, vice-governor Servet, and Governor-general Mustafa Abdulhalik Renda, Talaat's brother-in-law.


Young Armenian male starved and tortured in Syria

...

And so on and so on and so on.

Historical evidence for the near complete slaughter of the Armenian population under Ottoman rule is so massive and undisputed (the Armenian Genocide is the secondmost documented genocide after the Holocaust) that it is actually A-MA-ZING that anno 2007 the Turkish government - and the Turkish people -refuses to recognize one of the major crimes of humanity. One cannot imagine the Germans denying the Holocaust, and indeed they never tried to - although the individual, not directly involved German often resorted to the well-known catchphrase "Wir haben es nicht gewusst" - but here, today, are 70 million plus Turks who do deny their holocaust. The Germans went for a Thousand Year Reich and got a Thousand Year Shame instead, but at least they paid gazillions of Deutschmarks to compensate for the atrocities and supported the State of Israel, and generations of Germans who cannot possibly be held accountable for the sins of their fathers, grandfathers and great-grandfathers, continue to atone for the crimes of the Third Reich.

Mein Kampf: bestseller in TurkeyNot so the Turks. In Turkey, a brave man like the author Orhan Pamuk, was prosecuted for "insulting Turkishness" (articles 301 and 305 of the Turkish penal code), not even because of "controversial" books, but for merely stating the obvious. There, a gallant Armenian journalist, Hrant Dink, who even harbored strong patriotic feelings for the country which had nearly wiped out his ancestors, was murdered for having the audacity to write about the genocide in his newspaper Agos. There, the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism prepared a DVD denying the genocide and distributed it for free with the June 6, 2005 issue of TIME Europe under the guise of promoting tourism in Turkey. There, Mein Kampf (Kavgam) is a bestseller. Can we imagine the German government prosecuting a writer for saying that the Third Reich murdered 6 million Jews? We can't. But the Turks... they are getting away with it.

It is even worse. Readers of this blog will know my fondness of the current President of the United States. But from time to time even George Bush does or says things that greatly annoy me. Now, at age 42 I am well aware of there being something like realpolitik. I do understand there's a grand scheme going on - trying to remake the Middle East, and by extension the muslim world, into something humane (to avoid having to ultimately turn it into a charred radioactive glass desert instead) - and I do understand the necessity of sometimes having to swallow bitter pills in order to reap rich tables. I do understand the importance of a continued flow of fuel, ammo and supplies through Turkey to the American divisions in Iraq. But with regards to Bush's efforts to stall House Resolution 106, I'd wager that was a bridge too far.

The time has come for the West to stop pandering to islam, whether it's its more radical zealots fighting us or whether it's its oversensitive "moderates". It is time the West says "Until Here And No Further", and if that implies calling a spade a spade and Turkey cannot live with that, sorry, but then you are not a mature democracy and you offer yet another argument for the incompatibility of islam with man-made democratic rule.

Face your terrible past, or you will ultimately face a terrible future.


MFBB.

Saturday, October 06, 2007

TALIBAN SUFFERING HEAVY LOSSES IN AFGHANISTAN; RECONSTRUCTION CONTINUES UNABATED.

The following is a translation from the reliable Dutch magazine "Trouw":

IN URUZGAN, A LOT HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED

Gino van der Voet , Lieutenant-Colonel, Commander Provincial Reconstruction Team Uruzgan from March to September 2007

For six months I was closely involved with the reconstruction effort in Uruzgan. I have, of course, followed the many reports and opinions in Dutch media about the situation there. Having worked myself in Uruzgan till last September, I am sorry to say I recognize very little therein [from the real situation].

A lot has changed in Uruzgan. I remember the situation two years ago, when I first reconnoitred the area. There's a world of difference with the present day situation. Those driving through Tarin Kowt now, see tremendous activity. The number of shops has more than doubled, and they offer more. Building companies act as local DIY's too. More trucks than ever drive to Kandahar and back carrying goods.

At the time, the camp lay at least at a distance of one kilometre from the township, now it borders, together with Camp Holland, on the outskirts. More and more Afghan citizens settle in Tarin Kowt to benefit from the activity. So there's certainly a good deal of positive news to tell. Last week Minister Koenders of Development Aid, together with his Afghan colleague, signed the building contracts for the first eleven schools, paid for by The Netherlands via the 'Equip Programme'. And then there's lots of ongoing projects in the fields of education, health care, agriculture, infrastructure, justice and safety.

That things don't move faster is disappointing for some. This conclusion however ignores the circumstances under which the reconstruction effort takes place. Do not forget that Uruzgan is one of the poorest provinces in one of the poorest countries. Of the inhabitants, 93.5% cannot read or write. Establishing effective local governance is therefore a tiresome process. One NGO assists in this task, in Tarin Kowt. On the provincial level, this too will take time. Even as the local authorities are so "green", we prefer to organize our projects in cooperation with them. In this manner one gives the reconstruction effort an Afghan face, which is of paramount importance for the populace to trust its own authorities.

That it won't go faster is also because of the polarization, over tens of years of conflicts and suppression, of Pashtun society. Tribal twists and faux tribal representation in local authorities have led to nepotism. Some parts of the population are deliberately neglected. In an environment like that, we cannot simply pass by and start a project. It costs time to get a good grasp of the local circumstances, but it can't be done any other way. A project that favors one tribe over another, is doomed.

Gaining the trust of the population costs time. But over the past months, a solid base has been laid. Using the contacts we have now, we reached a level of success in new projects. And about that reconstruction effort: there sure are obvious results. Under the PRT's aegis, over the course of one year schools have been renovated or built and irrigation canals have been dug and dams been built. Sabotage by Taliban fighters - widespread in other provinces - hasn't taken place. Not one Dutch PRT project has been set on fire. We ask a local community: what do you need? The school that's built subsequently with Dutch money won't be torched that fast by the Taliban. They would lose all sympathy among the locals.

The Netherlands is deliberately keeping a low profile in the reconstruction effort, so as not to give the impression the project is an exclusive NATO/ISAF initiative. Much smarter is it to have the school built by local entrepreneurs. During patrols the PRT is checking whether the work is done according to the plans drawn up.

It is true, the Taliban try to undo our work and get the country under their yoke again. The Task Force's military act against that. The locals simply don't want to live under the Taliban. They want a future for their family, so that their children can go to school. They want a life without Taliban confiscating their winter rations, enforcing shelter at gunpoint, bomb attacks. The Taliban aren't that strong they can paralyze the whole province. They don't have that power.

The heavy fighting of the past few months doesn't mean The Netherlands is losing. To the contrary, the fighting has enhanced the Dutch troops' standing among the locals, even if civilian casualties were counted. In some areas we now have easier access. Given the circumstances the Dutch military is working in, Holland has accomplished a lot the past year. But it is and remains a first step. All our results have to be consolidated and that too costs time, requiring a long-lasting involvement of the international community.

- Lt.Col. Gino Van Der Voet, Dutch Army, Uruzgan Province

This is not the first time that I read about the Dutch success in quelling Taliban terror, using the bifold tactic of an iron fist against the terrorists and smart, intense cooperation with the local population in rebuilding their war-torn country. As our good friend CDR Salamander has noted several times:

There never was a feeling that there was strictly a military solution to AFG. The military can only provide the security so that the true keys to victory – rule of law, reconstruction and development – can take place. That has always been the case.

You should follow that link. It has an amazing story about American paratroopers enlisting the help of an anthropologist - yes, an anthropologist - in their fight against the Taliban:

SHABAK VALLEY, Afghanistan — In this isolated Taliban stronghold in eastern Afghanistan, American paratroopers are fielding what they consider a crucial new weapon in counterinsurgency operations here: a soft-spoken civilian anthropologist named Tracy.

Tracy, who asked that her surname not be used for security reasons, is a member of the first Human Terrain Team, an experimental Pentagon program that assigns anthropologists and other social scientists to American combat units in Afghanistan and Iraq. Her team’s ability to understand subtle points of tribal relations — in one case spotting a land dispute that allowed the Taliban to bully parts of a major tribe — has won the praise of officers who say they are seeing concrete results.

Col. Martin Schweitzer, commander of the 82nd Airborne Division unit working with the anthropologists here, said that the unit’s combat operations had been reduced by 60 percent since the scientists arrived in February, and that the soldiers were now able to focus more on improving security, health care and education for the population...


Okay, enough now about reaching out to other cultures, anthropologists and learning mollahs how to craft wooden shoes. For those Taliban who are no quick studies, there are other courses and projects:


Dutch F-16 takes off from Kandahar Airfield

Or:

Dutch Apache attack helicopter

Or:

Dutch Bushmaster armoured trucks

HOLLAND BOVEN!!! (*)


MFBB.

(*) (Low Countries version of Holland ueber alles)

Friday, September 28, 2007

DEBUNKING A POPULAR MYTH: WHY BELGIUM IS BY NO MEANS AN ARTIFICIAL NATION.

Those who read The Brussels Journal every now and then will know that these days good part of the coverage is dedicated to, it is suggested, an inevitable if not imminent split of the Belgian nation.

Keen observers of European politics will be familiar with this recurring theme, the tensions surrounding it flaring up every time a general election is held. As a 42-year old Belgian, I must admit that never before I have known so tense an atmosphere with regards to the endless bickering between Flemings and Walloons, Belgium's two principal peoples (there is a small community of German-speaking Belgians in the extreme east of the country, but they don't really count in national politics). At the core of the current debate, which began after the June 10 parliamentary elections, is the so-called BHV dossier, the acronym BHV standing for Brussel-Halle-Vilvoorde. Lack of progress in this dossier - of which the key Flemish complaint is that in certain parts of Flanders Wallonian parties can field candidates while the reverse is nowhere possible, is the reason why, three and a half-months after the elections, Belgium still has no government. We will come to this item later on, but suffice to say that the longer this stalemate lasts, the larger the percentage of Belgians - Flemings and Walloons alike - who will make the thought exercise of splitting the nation up. To be sure, it is not that far yet. Belgium is no Czecholovakia. However, a recent poll revealed that a good 40% of Flemings and around 10% of Walloons thought a secession was inevitable. Having witnessed the evolution leading to these percentages, I'd wager that neither this year, or the year after, or three years after, you will find the independent Republics of Flanders and Wallonia on the map. But in 25 years? If Wallonia doesn't change its ways, it might be possible.

Strange though it may seem, I, as a Fleming, and a proud Fleming at that, and even a Vlaams Belang member, am NOT in favor of Flemish Independence. First, because I believe that if Wallonia turns away from the Left, it will get (much) more prosperous and won't need Flemish subsidization anymore, thereby obliterating the main reason for a breakup. Second, because I get SO tired of an argument constantly used by the pro-Independence types, namely "that Belgium is an artificial nation".

Imho, it is not. Or, if it is, by no means more so than, say, Germany, Italy or the United States. In the following I will try to explain why Flanders and Wallonia, however antagonistic they seem to each other, have always had age-old bondages, liaisons, mutual interests and shared histories. In 1830, they were NOT lumped together by ignorant cartographers in London. It is rather that the latter simply confirmed ancient boundaries as the frontiers of a mixed germanic/latin household that had throughout the centuries lived in the same "house", be it most of the time under foreign rule. In fact, "all" that happened was that the household was finally allowed to make up its own "house rules".


In 57BC, in the time frame when Ancient Rome was making the transition from Republic to Empire, Julius Caesar, one of the three members of Rome's first Triumvirate and governor of Gallia Narbonensis in the south of what would become France, endavoured on the conquest of Gaul. It was a campaign which would last nine years and become one of the Republic's most expensive, a development of which the justification caused him much trouble. His account of the campaign is written down in his standard work Commentarii de Bello Gallico, and when I was a school kid, one of our first history lessons invariably highlighted a particular exerpt from it:

Gaul is divided in three parts, one is inhabited by the Belgae, the other by the Aquitanians, the third part by those who call themselves the Celts, but those we call Gauls. They all have other languages, institutions and laws. The Gauls are separated from the Aquitanians by the Garonne and from the Belgae by the Marne and the Seine. The bravest Gauls are the Belgae, because their culture and inhabitants are located far away from the rest of the province, because few merchants visit them, and because they are close to Germania, which is across the Rhine and with whom they are at war.


Ambiorix, leader of the Eburones tribeAlthough I would lie. The books left out the remark about the Belgians being bravest because they were the furthest away from civilization. Anyway, by defeating the Belgic tribes one by one, including the one I strongly suspect I am a descendant from (the Nervii), Caesar finally established Roman rule over what is present day Belgium and a considerable slice of northern France as well as one of the Rhineland. One of the last bitter pills to swallow for Caesar was the complete annihilation of an entire legion by the Eburones tribe under their leader Ambiorix. Caesar was no liberal and instead of finding out what it was exactly that had so pissed off the Eburones he decimated them, one of the earliest recorded genocides in human history. It was also one of the first ethnic cleansings, since he then had the pitiful remnants remaining in the area replaced with a friendly tribe, the Tungri. He backed up their presence with a military camp and the settlement became known as Tungrorum. Anno 2007, the place is known as Tongeren - Belgium's oldest town and the place where one of the inventors of the World Wide Web, Robert Cailliau, was born. As much as it might disturb good ole Caesar, today a large bronze statue of Ambiorix, wrought in a rather liberal interpretation, is adorning Tongeren's market square opposite the basilica. In 2005 Ambiorix was one of the contenders for The Greatest Belgian. In Flanders he ended fourth. In Wallonia, 50th. Tongeren lies just inside Flanders, you see.

Tongeren may lay inside Flanders, but only just inside it. Wallonia lies barely a couple of kilometers to the south. There is a reason for that, you know. The Romans constructed a very important road running in a faint arc southwestwards from Colonia (Cologne, see "Koeln" on the map to the right) in what is now Germany, over Bavacum (Bavay) northern France, to Boulogne-sur-Mer, at the Channel coast. As it happened, Roman - Latin - influence north of that road was less than south of it. The road more or less traced the fault line between the Latin and Germanic cultures. The origins of Belgium's linguistic divide can thus be traced back to a Roman road.


By the late 3rd century, a dying Roman Empire lost its grip on Gaul, although its cultural heritage would forever leave its mark, and a Western Germanic tribe known as the Franks filled the vacuum. Actually, already in 358 the Romans, gradually leaving the area which is by and large present-day Belgium, had entrusted the Franks with the defense of this northern border region, opting for some kind of peaceful coexistence instead of spending huge sums of money in a campaign they couldn't win anyway. Fifty years later, these same Franks had themselves to endure a subsequent invasion by yet another powerful Germanic tribe, the Vandals, which crossed the Rhine in December 406 and devastated much of Frankish Gaul. Somehow, the Franks withstood the Vandal onslaught, and as the latter proceeded further to the south a Frankish branch known as the Salian Frankish spawned the Merovingian dynasty, of which the most famous King was Clovis I. By the late 4th century, he had reunited much of Gaul north of the Loire river. As time went by, the Merovingian kings became weak and decadent, earning themselves the scornful soubriquet do-nothing kings, and in 751 the last one was deposed by his majordomus, Pippin the Short. This act was the formal end of the Merovingian dynasty, and the beginning of the Carolingian one, although the latter had been in charge for some time already: Pippins father, although nominally no king, was the famous Charles Martel, who stopped the Islamic conquest of Western Europe in 732 at the Battle of Poitiers, sometimes referred to as the Battle of Tours. In fact, although Pippin the Short was the first Carolingian king, the dynasty took its name from this Charles Martel, who earned his nickname (in modern English, "martel" means "hammer") by utterly devastating the muslim army and killing its commander, Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi, the Governor-general of what was then known as al-Andalus (Spain). Pippin the Short's son was... Charlemagne, better known in Anglosaxon countries as Charles the Great, the most famous Carolingian King, who transformed the Frankish kingdom in a veritable Empire covering most of Western Europe, large swaths of Central Europe, and northern Italy. You will forgive me a certain amount of chauvinism, but Charles Martel, Pippin the Short and Charlemagne were actually, erm, Belgians, since born in a place near present-day Liège which will certainly ring a bell among gun aficionados. I am, of course, talking about Herstal, which is the home of the Belgian small-arms manufacturer FN Herstal. In the context of our story, however, the most important thing is that under Frankish rule too, whether Merovingian or Carolingian, both areas which would become known as Flanders and Wallonia belonged to the same Frankish Kingdom, later Empire (see the outline of Belgium on the map above).

In 800 the great Charlemagne was crowned Emperor in Rome by Pope Leo III, and his empire encompassed all of present-day France and the Low Countries, half of present-day Germany and and the whole of what is now northern Italy. Barely 43 years later, this gigantic Empire was broken up in three among Charlemagne's grandsons. The western part - mostly the better part of contemporary France - went to Charles the Bald, the eastern part - half of today's Germany - to Louis The German, and the central part - what would become the Netherlands, the Franco-German border region and northern Italy - to Lothar. The empire of Charles The Bald, who was the youngest of the three brothers, suffered most from Viking raiders, and one of the most prone areas was the so-called Pagus Flandrensis or Flanders Shire, the northernmost region around a settlement which would later be called Brugge - Bruges. The forestier, or Charles' deputy ruler in the pagus flandrensis, was a certain Odokar III, and he had a son named Baldwin (Boudewijn in Flemish). In December 861 Baldwin had the audacity to run off with the emperor's daughter, Judith. To escape Charles's wrath, the couple first fled to Lotharingia and from there to Rome, to seek protection from Pope Nicolas I. The pope must have been a liberal since he endorsed the relationship of the two frolicking youngsters, and he persuaded Charles The Bald to give the couple his blessing. Thus happened, and Baldwin and Judith officially married the year after. Baldwin was given the pagus flandrensis as a wedding gift and became the very first Count of Flanders, eventually to be nicknamed Baldwin Ironarm, for his success in repelling the Viking attacks (other sources claim however that it was because he once allegedly pinned a bear against a tree using a spear). An important element in his strategy was that he reinforced ancient settlements at focal river confluences, where the Vikins used to sail up the hinterland. Two such places were Bruges and especially Ghent, at the confluence of the rivers Scheldt and Lys. As for Baldwin's spouse Judith, she became our First Countess. Together they had four children, of which the second one succeeded his father as Baldwin II. A dynasty was born, which would only come to an end a thousand years later, in 1983, when Prince Charles, the brother of King Leopold III, died. He was the last Count of Flanders.

The 10th century saw the gradual demise of the Carolingian empires, and thus of centralized control. While in France and England, Europes oldest nation states, a monarchy retained some semblance of "national" rule, the real power in this period rested with some sort of subnational level, the counties and duchys. The basic tenet of societal structure was feudalism, whereby the king or the most powerful lords granted vassals possession of land in exchange for their fealty - support in times of war, from the Latin fidelitas. The land was called a fief, and the people on it were allowed to make a living off the fief's harvest and its natural produce in exchange for protection. During this period, around the milennium, local vassals managed to become extremely powerful in their own right, sometimes by conquering adjacent fiefs, sometimes by marriage. In fact, some became so powerful that they became a challenge to the King, and this is about what happened in proto-Belgium, where the 11th century saw the rise of powerful counties such as Flanders, Brabant, Loon, Namur and Hainaut. Somewhat apart from them, but not less important, was the Prince-Bishopric of Liège. In the first three entities , Dutch was spoken, and in the latter three, French, in accordance as you may recall, with the stronger Latin influence to the south of the old roman road linking Cologne with Bavay, and continuing to Boulogne-sur-Mer. While these counties acted as "mini-states" and where thus independent from each other, there was some element of bondage between them given the fact that they found themselves sandwiched between the aggressive "French" and "German" spheres of influence. Notice on the map above, how the loose collection of semi-autonomous counties and duchies starts to assume, as early as the 12th (!) century, the form of 21st century Belgium. For those who think the Flemish-speaking and French-speaking peoples of the region were always enemies, as today some would want us to believe, it may come as a surprise that in the Middle Ages, the County of Flanders was twice united through a so-called personal union with the "Walloon" County of Hainaut, namely from 1067 till 1071 and from 1191 till 1246. The "Walloon" Prince-Bishopric of Liège practically owned te "Flemish" County of Loon (a county in the present-day Belgian provinde of Limburg). And even without such formal alliances or administrative subordinations, there were plenty of contacts between what is now called Flanders and Wallonia. Also on the personal level, and the sheer proliferation of "Flemish" names in Wallonia and "Wallonian" ones in Flanders is testimony to centuries of widespread intermarrying.


By and large, the "Wallonian" counties (the very name of Wallonia does in fact not emerge until the 19th century) tried to get away from French and German influence (tutelage at best, armed incursions at worst) by going the soft way. Not in the north though, where armed conflict halted foreign influence and/or safeguarded the survival of Flemish language and culture. Actually, the case can be made that the fact that nowadays Flemish is spoken in an arc stretching from the North Sea to the Meuse river, is the result of two resounding military victories over powerful neighbors. To the east, the victory of Duke Jan I of Brabant over the Germans under the archbishop of Cologne at the Battle of Woeringen, 5 June 1288, meant that the Duchy of Limburg was wrestled from German control and added to the powerful "central Belgian" Brabantine duchy. In the West, the County of Flanders fought a long-drawn war with France and though it ultimately had to yield, its resistance meant that it never became a part of France the way other entities like the Languedoc, Gascony etc... did qnd eventually became part of the French kingdom.

Now, of all the counties forming "medieval Belgium", it was Flanders which would become the most powerful and wealthiest. This evolution had a lot to do with the emergence of its cities, such as Ghent, Bruges, Kortrijk, Ypres (Ieper) and Oudenaarde. Not without justification one can state that capitalism was invented here. From the 10th century on, the most entrepreneurial among the peasantry left for the cities, where after one year they were free men. In those cities, commerce and industry, particularly the cloth industry, soon took a high flight. A chief factor in this development was the trade with England, whereby large quantities of raw wool, which England had in abundance but was unable to process properly, were sent over the channel, turned into high quality clothing by Flemish craftsmen, and transported back. These tremendous - for the time - trade movements were the main reason why throughout the Middle Ages England and Flanders were close allies. By the late thirteenth century, the French King, Philip IV, nicknamed "The Fair", seeing that an ever more prosperous Flanders, by then only in name subordinated to the French Crown, was escaping control, decided to teach the Flemings a lesson. The war between France and England, broken out in 1294, provided the alibi to send a large army to the renegades, who had allied themselves with France's arch-enemy. At first France's invasion succeeded, and by 1300 the County of Flanders was under firm French Control and the Count, Guy of Dampierre, and his two sons, were imprisoned. In his place the French King appointed a landlord, Jacques de Châtillon, who very quickly made himself detested. After the imposition of one tax too many, a De Châtillon party of roughly 200 French was brutally murdered on 18 May 1302 in Bruges, an episode known as the "Brugse Metten". De Chatillon managed to escaped, and that same summer Philip The Fair, white with rage, sent the most splendid Knight's Army the French Crown had ever assembled to Flanders to extol revenge. It was utterly defeated on 11 July 1302 before the gates of Kortrijk, in southwest Flanders, in a Battle that lives on in history as the Battle of the Golden Spurs. One of the key leaders, leading the contingent from West Flanders, was Guy of Namur. Namur is in Wallonia. Today, it's even the capital of the Walloon Region. So the Flemings' most splendid victory ever, the news of which reached a shocked Pope Boniface VII one week later, was achieved under the (shared) leadership of... a Walloon.


(to be continued)


MFBB.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

BRUSSELS POLICE ACT LIKE NAZIS; LEADING SLOVAK POLITICIAN SAYS BEHAVIOUR BRUSSELS MAYOR AND POLICE REMIND HIM OF COMMUNIST DICTATORS

On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 a small gathering of about 200 people on Brussels Luxemburg Plaza was all that materialized of the predicted "tens of thousands" of concerned Europeans, set to demonstrate on that day against the islamization of Europe. Of course, the SIOE demonstration had been forbidden by the extreme leftwing mayor of Brussels, Freddy Thielemans. Of course, the head of the German branch, Udo Ulfkotte, had but one week ago unilaterally decided to withdraw his support for the project. But still, two hundred people was an extremely meager number of people to address a very serious, pan-European problem.

The two hundred were not really demonstrating, but gathering.
They were not acting in a violent manner.
They were not destroying anything.
They were not hurling insults against the "authorities".
They were no vandals, no skinheads, no hotheads.

Yet the Brussels Police suddenly attacked in a coward and violent manner. Well-mannered, civilized, well-clothed and contributing European citizens and taxpayers were roughed up in the most appalling ways.

154 arrests were made.

September 11, 2007, was a day meant amongst others to commemmorate the victims of islamic terrorism.

The Brussels Police turned it in a Day of Infamy instead.



From a reader over at The Brussels Journal:

A Day in Brussels, A Fifty Yard View

Around 10:45, driving around the Luxembourg and Berlaymont areas in Brussels it became obvious the demonstration was en route to become “a whole lot ado ‘bout nothin’ ”. It’s hard to say whether there were 12 or 15 dozen demonstrators near the Europarliament Buildings, come noon, how many there were at the Luxemburg plaza or in between, I can’t say, but what was abundantly clear, was that these particular Brussels areas were under siege.

However much the Belgian media portray the SIOE demo as an anti-islam ralley, I wanted to be there because I’ve started reading the Koran about three years ago. I challenge any or other rational opponent of the demonstration to do the same and not be concerned. I happened to be in Brussels, since it matters to me personally, apart from the fact that 9/11 left a profound impression, and to this day still does, that is...

I wanted to see for myself how the authorities would react. Seeing is believing. As soon as I saw the might of the police and recognised the efforts the authorities had taken throughout the neighbouring communes, it was pretty clear most of those unorganised individuals who would have wanted to attend simply decided to do a 180 and got the hell out of Dodge. Police outnumbered demonstrators by some 300% (guesswork).

Impressive it was, and although throughout the surrounding area police forces kept to themselves, acting as inconspicuous as pink elephants near the north-pole, the cordon policiaire that had been thrown in front of the demonstrators, (keeping to the stairs of the roundabout opposite the Berlaymont-building), the flashing policecars, the horses, the dogs, and the riot-police stood their ground; in the side-streets numerous riot-cars went to all lengths to be overtly and utterly visible. Police in combat gear stood within shouting distance.

No crowds in their tens of thousands, not all too many banners or cards, some flags here and there, and most of the time the demonstrators were hidden behind the press-camera’s clicking away at God knows what. They didn’t wear combat boots, they didn’t carry any sticks, there were no baseball-bats, they didn’t wear face-masks, and they didn’t rip open the pavement, no window-panes shattered, no refuse-cans were lit, the café was open and sold cofffee and sandwiches, business as usual. The demonstrators probably just voiced grievances, although I can’t tell since I didn’t hear any of it. They may not have shaven their heads, they didn’t wear orange, or off-white sarongs, they didn’t fold their hands in front of them, and they didn’t seek any of their heads to forcefully meet with truncheons, yet…

Yet yes, the demo had been banned, and yes there’s probably laws against unlawfull manifestations, and yes, all those in the midst probably knew what to expect, if push came to shove.

However, … For some or other reason police made a dash towards selected demonstrators and singled out those, who for all intents and purposes didn’t in any way seem ‘aggressive’ from my 50 yard away-off-to-the-side view. All those that were brutally manhandled suffered the hyper-adrenaline anger of some eager roughshot-riding police, and although they put up with the assault, they didn’t as such retaliate. Although they did not quite “resist” the person in authority, one was hard put to tell whether the struggles that ensued, were not caused by the ‘brute way’ in which they were thrown to the ground, or it jus may be they simply wanted to prevent their three-piece suits from being torn. And when they voiced their disagreement with the way they were manacled, they protested the fact that they were manhandled. Some protesters even involuntarily ran in to 2-foot truncheons, that happened to be in the way.

It needn’t have come to that. There was simply no momentum. This was unnecessary. An overreaction to an out of control fenomenon. If the police hadn’t acted as they have,… they would have come out tops. As is the case, and under orders, they’re the losers,… Brussels lost face. If one is treated the way these politicians today have been treated for peacefully protesting against a ban on being allowed to peacefully demonstrate, then there’s something wrong. Acutely and perversely wrong.

For, for example the United States as constitutional democracy, specifically allows for peaceful demonstrations to address social and/or political grievances and specifically allows the freedom of assembly to express these grievances. In the ‘New-Europe’ Capital it is now abundantly clear one has no such rights.


Some appalling pictures over at this Danish site.

From another TBJ reader:

The police initiated violence without provocation and I personally witnessed and photographed the officer who appeared to be coordinating the assaults on people. This officer was busy throughout the encounter and was seen and photographed maneuvering frequently between groups of uniformed police and communicating with unknown others whereupon he re-directed the troops to another snatch operation against identified targets ... it was fascinating to watch and he became appallingly clumsy, predictable and blase about his nefarious actions - he obviously was having a really thrilling 'boys day out' telling 'the lads' who to pounce on next - a real hardline bully.

I witnessed first hand the un-provoked and un-warranted assaults on peaceful participants and stood near groups of armed officers waiting for their instructions listening to them in 4 separate locations whispering, nodding and calling up attention onto apparently specific participants who were moving around and circulating.

I am convinced the police were there deliberately to target specific individuals as they left many participants alone who clearly were not in their sights - myself included.

The vast array of armed 'stormtroopers' in backstreets and my witnessing of their subsequent initiation of unprovoked assaults against targeted participants leads me to firmly believe there was a counter-agenda. The SIoE demonstration was but a sideshow and Freddy-the-Mayor is just a stalking horse.



ALLOWED IN EUROPENOT ALLOWED IN EUROPE

If you live in a free society and want to keep it so, fight its islamization if you are confronted with it.

But above all, Fight Leftism.


MFBB.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

PATRIOT DAY



Destroy. Them.


MFBB.

Friday, August 24, 2007

SUMMER'S ALMOST GONE...

... so if I want to have at least a lame excuse for something completely different it's about time.



If you are a "jihadi", you are kindly requested to scrutinize miz sunshine thoroughly, so that you may burn in hell.

MFBB.

Friday, August 10, 2007

MEET FREDDY THIELEMANS, MAYOR OF BRUSSELS. COWARD. TRAITOR. DHIMMI. SOCIALIST STINKER.

Comment 849. E K Cohen From Arizona, USA: To Mr. Mayor Freddy Thielemans: My US Army father did not endure the Battle of the Bulge so that I could watch Belgians kneel before barbarian invaders. Shame on you!

Freddy Thielemans, Grand Mufti of BrusselsOK, so what happened? On September 11, 2007, the SIOE organization [Stop The Islamization of Europe - MFBB] intended to organize a demo in Brussels, in front of the European Parliament, to protest against what they call the "invasion of muslim customs". In particular, SIOE protests against the encroaching influence of islamic sharia law on relations within Europes muslim communities - and, by extension, to the relations of muslims with indigenous Europeans. Societal trends and separate cases give indeed ample reason for concern, and to name but a few we cite the results of a 2006 UK poll, which revealed that 40% of British muslims wanted sharia law to be introduced in parts of the country; the purposeful "soft" expulsion and discreet intimidation of indigenous shop owners by their moroccan counterparts in Borgerhout, Antwerp; the steeply rising number of honor revenge cases, e.g. in Rotterdam; the molestation of gays and muslim apostates in Amsterdam, the continentwide building of highly visible mosques, funded with money from the Gulf region and under the auspices of Milli Gorus, the Muslim Brotherhood etc etc etc...



Europe had to wait a long time for it, but apparently we are reaching a point whereby sufficient indigenous Europeans are saying "Enough is enough". And so it was that three apolitical European organizations, concerned about the growing influence of Islam, decided to bundle their forces and hold a peaceful demonstration against the Islamization of Europe in Brussels. The event was scheduled for the 11th of September, the West's most symbolic date in its conflict with political islam, and indeed SIOE planned to hold a 1-minute silence to commemmorate the victims of 9/11. SIOE groups the UK's No Sharia Here, led by Stephen Gash, the Danish SIAD (Stop Islamiseringen af Danmark) from Anders Gravers, and last but not least the German Pax Europa, under the chairmanship of Dr. Udo Ulfkotte.


The aims of SIOE, as stated on their site, are:

1° SIOE exists to legally combat the overt and covert expansion of Islam in Europe.

2° SIOE condemns racism as the lowest form of human stupidity, but considers Islamophobia to be the height of common sense.

3° SIOE states that Islam and democracy are incompatible due to teachings within the Koran itself and some of the hadiths which comprise sharia law.

4° SIOE sees that such incompatibility is self-evident when those tenuous democracies in countries where Islam is the dominant religion are scrutinized.


You can agree or disagree with these aims, and personally, with regards to 3°) and 4°) I am still waiting for the US-led effort to implant democracy in the ME to succeed. I still hope the resulting growth in wealth and prosperity, coupled with the Rule of Law, will allow afree enough intellectual climate to take root from which truly moderate religious scholars will step forward, proposing more benign teachings of islam. At the very least, greater material wealth in the ME will in itself stem the influx of muslims in Europe, who now flee their native countries because they live in squalor and under tyranny, and who seem not to comprehend that the very lifestyles they import here are exactly the reasons they lived in squalor and under tyranny.

But these are only minor differences. While the US's prodigious and bold undertaking in the ME can, and should, continue its way, the current ongoing Islamization of Europe does present a "clear and present danger", to be addressed immediately and simultaneously. This really is a clash between civilizations, and typically for our respective cultures, the West's move to finally bring the muslim world in line with the rest of humanity is highly visible and open, while their move to cast a whole continent back into the Middle Ages is mostly a treacherous and covert affair, planned and orchestrated from MB headquarters and Ministries of Religious Affairs.

Well then, as late as Tuesday 7 August, SIOE's Ulfkotte and co-organizers had a meeting with some fifteen Brussels police officials and according to Ulfkotte "there were no problems whatsoever". Two days later, on 9 August, the demonstration had been forbidden by Brussels' Mayor, Freddy Thielemans. According to press reports, he did so after conferring with police and "other services", and he "feared that there would be incidents between demonstrators and immigrants who live in the neighborhood." His spokesman Nicolas Dassonville added:

"The danger for public order is too great. There is an important immigrant community nearby which might react. Moreover, the organization uses islamophobic language."

As if to provoke, Thielemans and Dassonville hastened to declare that every year, they receive between five and six hundred requests for demonstrations, and that over the past five years they only forbade five or six. So there you have it. An apolitical organization asks for permission to stage a demonstration to highlight a very obvious and worrisome development, and is denied the right to protest. By contrast, last year muslim organizations staged a demonstration in Brussels against the headscarf ban, WITHOUT EVEN HAVING ASKED PERMISSION, and... were given a free hand. The news of Thielemans' capitulation to islamic radicals, since that is what it is, caused quite some uproar in the Belgium. In response to this, Thielemans declared "that it was not so much violence from islamic immigrants he feared, but rather from rightwing extremists". Which is, of course, total bullshit. Ulfkotte's SIOE most emphatically distances itself from any political leanings or agenda, and has clearly demanded its demo be not abused by politicians of whatever stripe for their own purposes. Mr. Ulfkotte:


Dr. Udo Ulfkotte
"We are no extreme rightwing stone-throwers but peaceful people who want to come up for our rights. Is this no longer possible in the Capital of Europe? This strenghtens us in our resolve. Has radical islam advanced so much that a scared mayor takes such decisions? We will possibly hire lawyers to fight this decision."

Dr. Udo Ulfkotte knows what he is talking about when the subject is islam. This professor and former journalist spent twelve to fifteen years in islamic countries, mostly as a correspondent for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, and his experiences with this backward, mysogynic and utterly inhuman "religion" were so bad that back home in Europe he endeavoured on a personal quest to make westerners aware of the dangers of islam. Recently, during an interview with Muenchener Merkur, he remarked on his motives:

"I have seen executions in KSA and in Yemen, how hacked off hands were attached to the City Gate. I have seen stonings of women, how people are classified in different categories and experienced the antihuman world view of muslims."

Thielemans' decision to stifle freedom of speech becomes understandable when we learn about the person behind the name. He is a prominent member of the Parti Socialiste, the "Party of 1,000,000 scandals". This is not the time to elaborate on the subject, but it is safe to say that very likely no other party in the western hemisphere has such a dismal record of scandal, fraud, gross incompetence, political murder and silencing of political opponents. The Parti Socialiste has been governing Wallonia, Belgium's southern French-speaking half, for over sixty years. In so doing, they have so thoroughly ruined Wallonia morally, economically and financially that Wallonia cannot survive without important financial transfers from rich Flanders, Belgium's northern half. Yet further evidence of the bankruptcy of the Parti Socialiste way of governance was offered this week, when stats comparing cardiac arrests in Ghent, a typical Flemish city, with those in Charleroi, a typical Wallonian city, revealed that as a male citizen in Charleroi your chances on an acute cardiac arrest are twice as high as in Ghent.

The almost completed Essalam Mosque in RotterdamIt is a common phenomenon in all European areas that where socialists are losing indigenous votes, they start catering to the audiences they see as the next most important vote reservoir: immigrants, and in Europe that means mostly islamic immigrants. The prime constituency among these are not the first generation workers who came here searching for jobs, but rather the second and third generations, marred by high unemployment and characterized by their growing radicalization (third generationers are often far more religious than their predecessors). For over two decades now these people have been told by socialist politicians that the reason they live in squalor is not their own culture, but (western) society and racism from indigenous locals. This story fell not on deaf ears in a community which is notorious for its lack of self-criticism and love for conspiracy theories. In short, this is how socialism and islam found each other, and it shows. Brussels is the Belgian city with the largest number of islamic immigrants, and not surprisingly the PS is Brussels largest party. In the City Council, it holds 17 of the 47 seats. Of those 17, 10 are Muslims. The PS's coalition partner are the Christian-Democrats, with 11 councillors, of whom 2 are Muslims. Taking apart the non-islamic immigrants, then less than half of the City of Brussels' governing coalition, 13 out of 28 councillors, are native Belgians - among them Thielemans. And it is not so hard to imagine how the 10 muslim councillors in his fraction of 17 advised him how to deal with a "Stop the Islamization of Europe" demonstration.

This is not the first time that Freddy Thielemans - btw, not related to Toots - reveals himself to be a big friend of muslims, even though his buddies utterly despise his party's "progressive" ethics such as gay marriage, gay adoption, the facilitating of abortion etc etc. He is a notorious bon vivant - his rosy-red, fat appearance being so typical for a lot of Parti Socialiste bigshots - and last year, when he had to undergo a medical treatment on account of his lavish lifestyle, he appointed as Deputy Mayor the Algerian born Faouzia Hariche, who is, you guess it, a muslim. One explanation for Thielemans' love for the followers of the prophet is that they, like him, hate Christianity and Christians. A nice illustration thereof is the incident he had with his colleague of Angoulême, France. Angoulême and Brussels compete with each other for the title of European Cartoon Capital. Delegations from both rivals visit each other though, and in April 2005, when the Angoulême delegation led by Mayor Philippe Mottet, was visiting Brussels and having a drink with Thielemans, the latter received an SMS on his cell phone informing him of the death of Pope John Paul II. Instantly Thielemans, an atheist, exclaimed to those present: "Du champagne pour tout le monde et de l'eau pétillante pour M. Philippe Mottet!" [Champagne for everyone and sparkling water for Mr. Philippe Mottet! - MFBB]. The center-right Mr. Mottet (he is a member of Sarkozy's UMP as well as a catholic) and his delegation left the meeting in disgust prematurely, and were not present on an inauguration ceremony the following day. Apparently the brave Mr. Thielemans has no fear of offending adherents of certain other religious denominations.


Job 'the Muslim Brotherhood is not dangerous' Cohen, Mayor of AmsterdamThielemans' refusal to grant permission for SIOE's demonstration is but one illustration of how, throughout Europe, socialism and islam have gotten in bed with each other. All over Europe, prominent socialists take care not to "offend" their newfound constituency, muslims. Take Amsterdam, for example, where recently the Jewish (!) mayor, Job Cohen, of the Dutch socialist party PvdA, upon learning of the involvement of the Muslim Brotherhood in the building of Amsterdam's Westermoskee, declared that the MB was "not a dangerous organization". The radical islamist organization MB, founded by Hassan al-Banna in 1928, is known to have spawned several terrorist groups, like Hamas and Islamic Jihad. As if that wasn't bad enough, Cohen found it necessary last month to apologize for... several of the late Theo Van Goghs rowdy opinions on islam. Across the Channel, Cohen's colleague in the British Capital is even farther down the cliff. The lunatic Ken Livingstone, nicknamed "Red Ken", already made headlines by calling a Jewish journalist a concentration camp guard, befriending Hugo Chavez and apologizing for British Muslims leaving for the ME to commit terrorism. Livingstone is the big promotor of London's Mega Mosque Project, the Markaz, which is designed to accommodate up to 70,000 worshippers. The organization behind the Markaz is Tablighi Jamaat, according to the FBI an organization with ties to... Al Qaeda.


Bertrand Delanoe, Mayor of ParisIn Paris, the openly gay Socialist Mayor Bertrand Delanoe does his utmost best to please the followers of the prophet, just like his Dutch and British counterparts. The new Al-Dawa mosque and the planned adjacent socio-cultural centre will be built on a terrain of 3,000 square meters, generously offered by Mr. Delanoe - whose office also organizes yearly events at the occasion of the Ramadan. In October 2006, Mr. Delanoe personally inaugurated a new "Institute of Muslim Cultures", built in an old state school in the Rue Léon, Paris. A zeal like that is a bit strange, given that Mr. Delanoe narrowly escaped death in 2002 when he was stabbed in the stomach by... a muslim. Upon arrest, the perpetrator, a certain Azedine Berkane, admitted he "disliked gays".


Mayor of Berlin Klaus Wowereit, to the leftOver to Berlin, where the end of this year will probably see the completion of the new Ahmadiyya Mosque in Pankow, a neighborhood in the former East Berlin. Berlin's mayor is a jolly good fellow by the name of Klaus Wowereit, openly gay and like so many socialists (he's a prominent member of the SPD) a pork barrel spender, see this TIME article: "Even though the financial and economic situation of a city may be bad," Wowereit says, "you must show a sense of enjoyment in life." Enjoy the good life while you still can, Mr. Wowereit. Btw, now that we were talking about pork and pork barrel spending, last year, during a television debate with his Christian Democrat contender for burgomaster of Berlin, Mr. Wowereit declared himself to be in favor of a "world-open Berlin" [Weltoffenes Berlin], as well as a strong advocate of the building of the new Ahmadiyya mosque in Pankow. It can be seriously doubted whether the good people of said mosque appreciated Mr. Wowereits concern and support, since their website cites, a.o., Khalifa [a religious bigshot in the Ahmadiyya sect] Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad, who wrote that the higher visibility of homosexuals in the West (couples walking hand in hand, Gay Pride parades etc.) can be connected to the consumption of pork meat! Probably Mr. Wowereit simply ate far too much Schweinefleisch.


Philippe Moureaux. Caliph of Molenbeek, BrusselsThis list would not be complete without Philippe Moureaux, the mayor of Molenbeek, one of the 19 communes of Greater Brussels. Moureaux is one of the top Parti Socialiste officials in the whole of Brussels, and Molenbeek is his personal fiefdom. It was he who, in 2005, forbade his police officers to drink coffee and eat sandwiches in the streets during Ramadan. He also ordered them to limit their patrols significantly. Today, Molenbeek is a hotbed of Islamic extremism. Apart from his career in local politics, Moureaux has also been, in times past, a pivotal figure in Belgium's federal political arena, where he was deeply involved in drafting the law allowing non-Belgians to vote in municipal elections, as well legislation against racism and xenophobia. Over the years, this legislation was time and again amended until it was tailor-made, so to say, to "kill" the Vlaams Blok - or so Moureaux & Co thought. That was in 2004, and the VB only escaped being completely outlawed by changing its name. Philippe Moureaux' hatred of the VB is not only because of the "racism" he and his ilk perceive in this party or in each and everyone who dares to object to obvious problems caused by muslim immigrants. No, this man hates Flemings because he is a racist himself, and a fierce anti-Fleming racist at that. I have known him for over twenty-five years now, and during all this time I have never heard this cretin utter a single word in Flemish. I bet however, that by now he does speak quite a mouthful of arabic. After all, he married a muslim wife.


EPILOGUE.

The following comment was left on a De Standaard poll page, put up to feel the pulse with regards to the rightness of Thielemans' decision. The comment is from a Flemish student living in Molenbeek.

As a Flemish student in Molenbeek I seem to discern a problematic, cultural islamic influence: during the day or at night I have, until now, never been harassed. Women on the other hand are inevitably addressed at night if they aren't accompanied by a man. Young muslims call the women then denigrating names and follow them on foot or with their cars. I am not talking here about threats or robberies. Still, this practice is daily bread and legally speaking difficult to penalize. As a consequence, women feel unsafe and dare no longer venture out alone at night. And even if there are more than two, they still prefer that a boy accompanies them. In this way muslim culture, in a subtle way, achieves its goal. Namely that the woman without headscarf has no business on the streets at night. And so the indigenous woman unwillingly accepts muslim culture. Like I already said, the deeds look futile, the consequences are not!!! Frederic.


If you love freedom, sign that petition:




MFBB